COUNCIL HEALTH PROBE INTO FINGE CAMP. Report by ERWIN CHLANDA.
The town council's health inspector is investigating the so-called
Warlpiri Camp on the North Stuart Highway where about 40 squatters have
been living without toilets or any ablution facilities for nearly one
month.
The Alice News has been told by a senior man staying there, Kenny
Wayne, that the only place for his extended family to defecate is in
the grass and bushes surrounding their makeshift accommodation.
The mostly elderly adults and children have been living at the Warlpiri
Camp since reportedly being evicted from the nearby "Woodyard Lot",
owned by the Aboriginal Inland Mission based in Sydney.Last Saturday,
24 days after the plight of the group became public, the only
"facilities" that had been provided by any organisation were four
44-gallon drums for use as rubbish bins, which Gerry Baddock, a
frequent visitor to the group, says are sometimes overflowing.
The camp is a few metres from a large service station, the Truckstop,
and across the road from a major tourist resort, the Red Centre Resort.
Tangentyere Council, which receives some $6m in public funding
annually, and which is widely regarded as the organisation under the
greatest obligation to help, has not responded to enquiries about the
fate of the group, but it did apparently provide the rubbish
bins.Tangentyere is chartered to support the Aboriginal town lease
areas - held under individual titles by Aboriginal housing
associations.The Warlpiri Camp, Ilperle Tyathe, is one of them. Town
council CEO Nick Scarvelis says no complaints have been received about
the sanitary conditions for the camp's new inhabitants.The council is
making enquiries following a request for comment from the Alice News.Mr
Scarvelis says if the defecation is taking place on the town lease
area, the council will be taking up the matter with the appropriate
housing association, possibly through Tangentyere Council.If vacant
Crown Land is being used, then the council would contact the Department
of Lands, Planning and Environment.Either way the areas are within the
municipality of Alice Springs.The group had lived at the Woodyard Lot
for six years, according to Mr Wayne, and now hope to be given housing
in the southern section of the Warlpiri Camp.They continue to express
the belief that this will be supplied by Tangentyere. At present the
group use tents and humpies, covered with corrugated iron and
boughs.These shelters leak in rain, and several of the occupants are
sick after the recent wet weather, according to Mr Wayne.
WHAT THE N.T. GOVERNMENT PAYS FOR THE PRIVATE AYERS ROCK RESORT.
The privately-owned Ayers Rock Resort will get more than $4m in NT
Government funded public works this financial year, according to
Treasurer Mike Reed.He said in a letter, leaked to the Alice News, that
the "Ayers Rock Resort is now privately owned" but "the people living
and working there remain Territory residents."As residents, they
receive services from Government just as do the people of Jabiru,
Nhulunbuy and other special purpose centres."It appears Mr Reed is
drawing a long bow in making this comparison.The Ayers Rock Resort -
and the more than 100 square kilometres on which it is situated - is
owned under freehold title, and all activities are subject to control
by the proprietor since late last year, General Property Trust (GPT).By
contrast, Jabiru is subject to considerable public control. The land is
owned by Parks Australia, a Federal Government instrumentality.The town
site is leased to the Jabiru Town Development Authority, a statutory
body set up under NT law.This authority is governed by a board of
seven, all appointed by the NT Minister for Local Government, with the
majority of four being three NT public servants and one councillor from
Jabiru town council. These are answerable directly or indirectly to the
public.The minority three members are officials of the main local
mining company, ERA. The authority may sub-lease land for residential
or business purposes.In the Ayers Rock Resort, GPT has the sole say
over who lives, works or conducts business there, and any such
arrangements are made by way of lease at the discretion of GPT.Mr Reed
says in the letter that this fiscal year the Ayers Rock Resort will be
getting a new fire station for $970,000; new fire equipment ($230,000),
modification to the police cells ($100,000); upgrading of the Lasseter
Highway - Yulara Drive intersection (within the resort - $200,000);
augmentation of electricity generating capacity ($1.2m, part of a $4.2m
program); and augmentation of waste water treatment
($200,000).Additionally, says Mr Reed, the Education Department
provides assistance for students living there, and the Centralian
College offers courses to locals. The resort will contribute $143,000
towards operational costs for fire services.
WE WANT OUR SAY ON THE CONSTITUTION! Comment by JUNE TUZEWSKI.
The Prime Minister's historic announcement that an in-principle
decision has been made for the Northern Territory to become a state has
been welcomed by many, derided by some and queried by quite a few. The
goal is that the NT should become Australia's seventh state on New
Year's Day 2001 - a new state for a new century - and the first new
state admitted to the Federation in its entire 100 year history. The
Territory Legislative Assembly sittings this week has seen lively
debate on the topic. Unfortunately, our adversarial system of political
debate, and the nature of some politicians' egos, do not always serve
to put important topics such as this into a framework that can be
understood by those outside the political arena. The detail and
intricacies of the issues are complex, but there are some broader
aspects about which we will all have an opinion. The Radio National
forum "Australia Talks Back" devoted Thursday's program to Territory
statehood. The majority of callers were from interstate and were not
supportive. Well-known Territory historian, Peter Forrest, did a great
job in representing the Territory, his responses often setting the
record straight. I am on the record as a supporter of statehood. I
believe there are no intrinsic differences in the individuals that make
up the NT from those who make up the population of other states. Why
then should our rights or responsibilities be different from other
Australians? Coinciding with the Prime Minister's announcement in
Canberra on August 11, the Federal Minister for Regional Development,
Territories and Local Government, Alex Somlyay, addressed the NT
Legislative Assembly. He assured "all Territorians that any terms and
conditions of statehood" would be "subject to full consultation and
negotiation". These cover the areas over which the Commonwealth
Government has retained control - industrial relations, uranium mining,
the payment of mining royalties, Aboriginal land rights and national
parks. Other matters which are subject to negotiation are those
relating to Senate representation and arrangements for the Indian Ocean
Territories (Christmas and Cocos-Keeling Islands, Ashmore and Cartier
Islands). While the topic of Senate representation has received
considerable public discussion, the latter has hardly been mentioned.
Under the government of former ALP Prime Minister Keating, the Indian
Ocean Territories were included in the electorate of the Northern
Territory for voting purposes at Federal elections. It will be
interesting to see if the Federal Government consults with residents of
the Indian Ocean Territories on the matter of inclusion in the new
state. The Prime Minister has made it clear that we cannot expect to
have 12 Senators on statehood - and Chief Minister, Shane Stone appears
in agreement. Looking at what has happened recently in the Senate,
there could be some interesting ramifications if we were to have three
to five Senate representatives. Separate from, but linked to the above,
is the Northern Territory Constitution, the document which sets out the
way in which we wish to be governed. The Legislative Assembly last week
endorsed "in principle" the draft constitution from the Statehood
Convention held earlier this year. Chief Minister Shane Stone has
indicated that copies of the document will be distributed to
Territorians in the next month. Given that there are some important
meetings being held, particularly by Aboriginal groups, it will be
interesting to see whether further public input - and change - to the
draft constitution as it stands, will be allowed.At what stage does the
draft become the formal constitution?At his press conference, the Prime
Minister stated that his government would "facilitate at a Federal
level the holding of a referendum on statehood within the NT at the
time of the next election".As many readers would be aware, I was a
delegate to the Statehood Convention. While it was outside the brief of
the convention, delegates did make the recommendation that statehood be
put before Territorian at a referendum. This has been arranged and a
Referendums Bill 1998 placed before the Legislative Assembly.Again,
while it was outside the convention delegates' brief, the majority
voted in favour of a three part question for the referendum, which
clearly separated approving statehood and the constitution.I have not
seen much publicity regarding the actual question or questions that
will be put in the referendum.During the past week I have been asked
this question by a considerable number of people who hold different
political views. I would hope to have more information in next week's
column.In the run-up to the Federal election and the referendum, all
politicians, and leaders of major community organisations, will need to
ensure that Territorians can clearly understand which topic is being
addressed. Both the Federal Coalition and the ALP have given support to
Territory statehood, if it is the wish of Territorians. The
Constitutional Convention organised by Centralian Aboriginal people and
currently underway at Kalkaringi has attracted a diversity of
influential speakers from Central Australia together with Territory and
Federal politicians. The range of issues being discussed over the four
days is impressive and like many others, I look forward to the results
of their deliberations with great interest. Another forum to both
inform and debate the issues of statehood and the constitution is being
organised by local identity Fran Erlich. Planned as an all day event
for Saturday, September 5, further details will be advertised shortly.
These forums play an important role, especially when set against the
background of comments made by Mr Somlyay in the Legislative Assembly.
He stated: "While I do not want to underestimate the complexity of some
of these issues, and while it is true that these issues will require
careful and comprehensive consultation with all interested parties,
including the Aboriginal community in the Territory, I do not believe
they represent barriers to statehood. "They are all issues which, with
goodwill and collective endeavour, can be resolved."
G.S.T. NOT LIKELY TO HARM TERRITORY'S "DISABILITY" FUNDING. By Dr ALISTAIR HEALTLEY, NT UNIVERSITY.
Argument about the cost to Territory residents has always been a
significant feature of the statehood debate and, now that the decision
to proceed to Territory statehood by 2001 has been taken, it can be
expected that questions about the financial price will be intensified.
Despite the government's consistent claims that statehood will not
involve additional costs, there is still a high level of scepticism
within the community. In recent Territory history, there are certainly
grounds for such scepticism. Some people might remember the assertion
by Paul Everingham before self- government that constitutional change
would only cost Territorians one extra can of beer a week. As taxes and
charges rose steadily in the years after 1978, Everingham's contention
was proved wrong.There are, however, clear differences between the
situation in 1978 and that of the late 1990s and the government's
position on the financial costs of statehood seems to be justified.
Obviously, the new funding arrangement set out in the tax package
announced last week, if it gains electoral and parliamentary approval,
introduces some unknown quantities but it is unlikely to depart much
from the existing distribution process. Since 1988-9, the Territory has
been funded on a state-type basis and it has been treated in
substantially the same way as the existing states. A pool of money,
whether a portion of Commonwealth tax revenue as it is now or provided
by the GST as proposed after 2000, is set aside by the Commonwealth for
distribution to the six states and the two mainland territories. It is
divided on the basis of "relativities" established periodically by the
Grants Commission. The purpose of the "relativities" is to ensure that
each unit of the federation is "given the capacity to provide the
average standard of (state-type) public services, assuming it does so
at an average level of operational efficiency and makes an average
effort to raise revenue from its own sources". That is the principle,
embedded within the Australia federal system, of "horizontal fiscal
equalisation". The Commission determines the appropriate "relativity"
on the basis of regional disabilities. In the case of the Territory, a
range of disabilities - factors such as the effects of distance,
remoteness and climate, high costs, population size and distribution,
and the sizable and disadvantaged Aboriginal community - is taken into
account. From those calculations, the Territory is rated the most
"fiscally disabled" polity and it receives a share of the pool which is
currently about five times the national average per head and about five
and a half times more than New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT. The
next most "disabled" state is Tasmania with a "relativity" of 1.55 (as
against the Territory's 4.88). Thus, the Territory receives a share of
general Commonwealth grants in per capita terms much higher than
elsewhere. Moreover, it receives a higher level (about 70 per cent
above the national average) of special purpose grants, which are funded
from outside the pool, than other jurisdictions. As a consequence of
the equalisation process, the Territory is the most dependent unit of
the Australian federation. About 80 per cent of its expenditure is
covered by Commonwealth transfers - well above the national average of
about 50 per cent. As local taxes and charges have risen, the level of
Territory dependency has declined; in the late 1970s, the proportion
was nearly 90 per cent. Indeed, before the High Court stripped the
states and territories of the ability to levy franchise fees last year,
about a quarter of the Territory budget came from internal sources.
And, it should be stressed that the Territory does fulfil the
requirement of raising local revenue at a rate equivalent to other
states. Statehood will not necessitate a wholesale lifting of
state-type taxes and charges. Even if the basis of federal funding is
changed in 2000, the Territory should not be affected unduly, if at
all, in financial terms when it becomes a state. As economic activity
and population increases, the extent of dependency will continue to
fall. If statehood involves expanded opportunities for revenue
collection, then dependency will decrease more rapidly. If the
Territory is born as a state in the context of a GST-based pool, then
it is likely to benefit from an expanding tax platform, long a demand
of state and territory Premiers and Chief Ministers, and the
concomitant removal of several existing tax imposts. From my reading of
the past financial treatment of the Territory and its prospects under
the mooted new revenue-sharing regime, there will be no adverse funding
ramifications for local residents. The situation following the
institution of self-government should not be replicated with the
granting of statehood. Any campaign against statehood, using arguments
of financial disadvantage, will have to be founded on rhetorical
conviction and not on solid factual evidence.[ED - Nevertheless, the
Alice News has asked both MHR Nick Dondas and NT Treasurer Mike Reed to
advise the exact mechanism under which the NT will continue to receive
"disability" funding, should the Coalition's plans come to fruition.
More about that - hopefully! - next week.]
THE NEW LITERACY PLAN DOESN'T SPELL MUCH OUT. By KIERAN FINNANE.
The document called the Northern Territory Literacy Plan is not
really a plan.Recently jointly published by the NT Department of
Education, the Catholic Education Office Darwin, and the Association of
Independent Schools of the Northern Territory, it is rather, by its own
acknowledgement, "an overview of the programs and materials currently
in place in the Northern Territory to support schools in the
development of students' English literacy".Along with the soon to be
published Northern Territory Numeracy Plan, it will become a basis for
"review of our current position and for decisions about its
enhancement".However, the document does not contain any measurement or
even generalised assessment of our current position, nor any precise
statement of needs.It indicates a commitment by all three education
systems to the "development of excellent English literacy skills" and
that an array of programs and materials are available to provide such
skills in the Territory, but the reader is given no idea as to how
effective these programs and materials are.Neither is there any
indication of the longevity of the numerous projects listed: what
source of funding do they depend on and how far will it take them?There
is no clear statement of deficit in the fraught area of Aboriginal
literacy, although the description of a number of targeted programs, as
well as the following comment, start to paint a picture: "Erratic
attendance at school for some [Indigenous] students, as a result of
their parents' mobility, often affects their capacity to gain optimum
benefit from the educational programs provided."The educational
challenge is further exacerbated because high mobility also
characterises the Territory's teaching population: teachers in our
schools come from all States of Australia and beyond, often stay a
short while - especially in the isolated communities - and then
depart."This reads as a rather helpless statement of the staffing and
attendance problems wracking many remote area schools (nearly 53 per
cent of all Territory schools, catering for just over 23 per cent of
students, are in remote areas).Under a "forward planning" heading, the
document says: "It is the responsibility of the NT Literacy and
Numeracy Task Group to identify gaps that exist in the systemic
provision of support for Indigenous students and make suitable
recommendations about changes or extensions to existing programs, the
adoption of new programs, and the more effective allocation of
resources".There are similarly worded statements vis a vis programs for
parents, for ESL students, and for the professional development of
teachers.It would appear that the public will have to wait till next
year for a concrete assessment of the NT's achievements in the literacy
field.As the document reports, in March 1997 the Ministerial Council on
Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) agreed to a
national goal: "Every child leaving primary school should be numerate
and be able to read, write and spell at an appropriate level."The
council also adopted a sub-goal: "Every child commencing school from
1998 will achieve a minimum acceptable literacy and numeracy standard
within four years of beginning school."To achieve these goals, a 10
point plan has been agreed upon, which includes comprehensive
assessment, bench-marking and early intervention strategies.There will
be "progress towards national reporting by systems and school
authorities on student achievements ... against the Year Three and Year
Five benchmarks from 1999 (in respect of 1998), data provided being
comparable by State/Territory."Further: "States and Territories have
agreed to provide MCEETYA with detailed plans of how schools will
ensure students meet minimum acceptable literacy and numeracy
standards, and how funds will be used to achieve measurable
improvements." The national plan also says that "from 1998 student
performance against nationally agreed standards will be reported to
them, their parents, teachers and schools by the relevant
State/Territory system ... Statewide performance data will be
published. Schools falling below agreed levels of student performance
will be assisted to develop literacy improvement plans."Next month,
September, then will see a "common writing task" administered to all
Years Three and Five or "age-equivalent" students in urban and
non-urban schools in the Territory. It will be centrally marked and is
"the principal component that will provide the data for measuring
students' writing and spelling achievements against the national
benchmarks".The benchmarks are being developed under the direction of a
national taskforce. The NT document reports that, as they are finalised
and further refined, appropriate changes will be made to the NT
assessment vehicles, English - An Outcomes Profile for NT Schools and
the Multilevel Assessment Program (MAP).It also says that a "format for
all schools to report to parents of Year Three and Five students on
their child's achievements in the MAP, including performance against
the benchmarks, is being developed."
ALICE SPRINGS COULD LEAD WORLD IN ARID ZONE RESEARCH.
"Leadership and vision" are needed to generate significant new
economic activity out of Central Australia based on "knowledge of the
arid zone", says Director of the Centre for Appropriate Technaology
(CAT), Dr Bruce Walker."I think that we in Central Australia could be
leaders in that area. We've got an excellent research facility in
CSIRO, a lot of work has been done by the Department of Primary
Industries on land management, CAT has done a lot of work on
technologies, a lot of people work in community development. "I think
it's a product that we can sell, not only here but elsewhere."We need
to be able to capture all that in a marketing ploy. We're pinning too
much on tourists. There are other things that we can do. "We need a
think tank with all those knowledge-based people and people who run
businesses."A ripple of enthusiasm is spreading the idea since a recent
seminar held in Alice by the Northern Territory Research and
Development Advisory Council (NTRDAC).The seminar heard that while
research and development (R&D) expenditure in the NT had grown by a
healthy 25 per cent between 1992-3 and 1995-6, to a total of $57.6
million, it still only accounted for just 0.8 per cent of national
expenditure. Industry R&D was a very low $4 million.Almost 90 per
cent of R &D was funded by, and 75 per cent performed by, the
public sector. Work has been focused strongly on three broad
socio-economic objectives: the environment (37 per cent), primary
products and production (18 per cent), and health (13 per cent); just
six per cent has been directed towards mineral and energy objectives;
there is almost negligible R&D on defence, manufacturing,
construction, or information and communication sciences (outside the
non-reported R&D in small firms). "There is prima facie evidence
that the Territory's R&D capability is strongly focussed on the
challenges of the past and the present," the seminar was told.
"However, it may not be developing sufficiently rapidly to address the
challenges and opportunities, and provide the underpinning knowledge
for the industries of the next decade."Now, says Dr Walker, a proposal
is being developed "to do some scenario planning" on the potential of a
local knowledge-based economic sector."It will require a fairly broad
group of people who will come together and actually market Central
Australia for a number of things we know a lot about."These include
delivering a range of services, technical, scientific and social. CAT
is already a significant performer in these areas. They are currently
involved in cooperative research with the Australian Centre for
Renewable Energy (ACRE). This centre is not short on scientific
expertise, but they need to find out what the barriers are to
delivering renewable energy products and services in remote
areas."While there's been a lot of market hype, nationally and
internationally, that renewable energy is free, in reality the systems
often can be just as expensive as conventional fuels. This brings
another set of constraints on the research environment," says Dr
Walker. "You may not be paying for fossil fuel to go in every day or
every week, but you pay in chunks to replace your batteries, to repair
an electronic component that's faulty, which requires a person who's
got a higher rather than lower level of technical expertise so it costs
you more for their time, and an air trip in and out. "They can be quite
expensive systems in a remote context. The energy that's converted is
free, but the cost of converting that energy can be significant. "So
these market-related issues, that we know of because of where we work,
need to be conveyed back into the research pool. "That is a tradable
thing."This cooperative relationship between CAT and ACRE is subject to
an intellectual property agreement. Dr Walker explains: "You indicate
up front what it is that you bring into the relationship, you
demonstrate where your previous experience has given you that
intellectual capital. "The process helps you to identify what is the
baseline of the intellectual property, and the intellectual property
that is developed as the result of the joint funding. "That activity is
then documented as the intellectual property of the joint venture, so
both parties own that and agree up front about how to treat that."If
they want to commercialise any aspect, there's an arrangement whereby
there's a commercial return to the parties."Another example of
"trading" intellectual capital is in work CAT's Cairns office has done
with the Queensland Government."In that instance we were asked to draw
up some terms of reference on infrastructure planning in communities.
We indicated as part of our contractual arrangements that we brought to
that project a series of contacts and understandings. "Our methodology
was our intellectual capital that we wanted to preserve, and in
applying that in the job we were about to do, we weren't actually
giving them the right to that piece of capital, we could use that
separately."You've got to be very careful to identify up front what it
is that you take into the relationship that you owned before you got
there, and make sure that that's not deemed to be owned by them."Dr
Walker says that in a lot of research work, there's no money to pay on
intellectual capital brought into the venture, until it actually
reaches the stage of commercialisation. "Let's take for example the
renewable energies project."If on the basis of some of the advice we
gave, there was a system that was designed, and they sold a million
versions of it in Indonesia, then we would expect to get a percentage
of the profit from that back to us as a payment for our intellectual
capital and the work we'd done."Quite detailed commercialisation
clauses cover this eventuality.More immediately, the return on
intellectual capital comes in the form of additional research grants on
the basis of work that CAT has done in the past. "The return is not an
replication of a product, it's on the acknowledgement of your position
in the field and your ability to conduct certain research and
activities."You're rewarded for that by getting the next job to do that
leads you on from that."NEXT WEEK: Rewards from far afield: CAT's work
for the UN in the "Golden Triangle".