Erwin, there may not be any point in flogging Centrelink …

Comment on A message from this vineyard: go horticulture! by Bob Durnan.

Erwin, there may not be any point in flogging Centrelink about this. As far as I can see, Centrelink staff are doing their job, which is to provide people with their welfare entitlements, and refer people who are unemployed and seemingly able to work to the privately-owned Job Services Australia (JSA) providers. This is the process decreed by successive governments. (Centrelink staff also give their clients access to current information about available jobs, and employers who are looking for workers. This is fine for highly motivated job seekers, but many unemployed are not ‘job-ready’).
The deal is supposed to be that if unemployed people don’t register with the JSA providers, then they won’t continue to get benefits from Centrelink.
The JSA providers tender to DEEWR for their contracts, which seem to be fairly lucrative, on the basis that they have the skills and determination to get unemployed people job ready and into available jobs. The JSA providers are responsible to DEEWR, not to Centrelink, which is marginalised in this loop.
If the unemployed people don’t co-operate with the JSA provider, or don’t accept jobs, then the JSA provider is supposed to report this to Centrelink, which cuts them off their benefits. Centrelink probably can’t physically take the unco-operative unemployed people to the grape farm at gun point, and chain them to the trellises without water until they pick the grapes. All it can do is to cut off the welfare supply.
What puzzles me, and what I think would be worth pursuing, is the issue of why DEEWR does not breach and penalise the JSA providers who seem to be entering contracts to get the unemployed into jobs, but then not carrying out their contracts. They seem to be not able, or maybe not willing, to do what is necessary to deliver the goods: they enter their contracts on the basis that they are expert wranglers, but then they seemingly fail to perform the most important wrangling on their agenda.
Does this failure include not being tough enough with their unemployed clients, i.e. not reporting quickly the failures to take up training and job opportunities?

Recent Comments by Bob Durnan

Elferink and Gooda clash over underage marriage
Peter, Posted June 30, 2017 at 2:30 pm: some young girls may resist promised marriage more strongly these days, but I doubt whether some are in a position to do so.
It has been authoritatively reported by youth workers in Alice Springs and Tennant Creek in the last few years that rape of young women is rife in these towns.


I’m not kungka, I’m arelhe
Does anybody know if the hours when the Arrernte words teaching program is held at the Apmere angkentye-kenhe are available somewhere on the net, or anywhere else?
I thought I had seen it advertised for every Wednesday night at 6pm, but this doesn’t appear to be the case?
I have gone there at this time, found it closed, and no notice or info on the door.
Anybody wanna clarify here?


Judge Borchers’ position should be assessed: CAALAS
Alex, of course one part-time worker with CAALAS is not able to, in your words, “work closely with EVERY SINGLE young person going throughout Central Australian court system, their family, community, lawyer, school and other service-providers to provide the young person with the support they need to get back on track and stay out of trouble”.
That is exactly my point, and why it is wrong for you to lay the blame on that worker, as you did when you wrote “if your PART-TIME advocacy programme co-ordinator did her job after this child’s court appearance in March, then he wouldn’t have appeared in court again in May.”
As I said earlier: That advocacy programme co-ordinator performed her job with great diligence and dedication, and cannot be held to blame for any alleged failure of duty of care, as the case load of such cases far exceeds the ability of one worker to cover even a small proportion of them. She was doing her job very well, covering as many of the cases as she could, but she wasn’t a magician. So your cheap jibe at her reputation is wrongly placed, and you should withdraw it.


Judge Borchers’ position should be assessed: CAALAS
Evelyne Roullet, Posted June 22, 2017 at 1:42 pm: Ralph was not talking about where or how the kid should be housed. He was referring to the bigger issue of the huge trauma in his life, caused by the alleged killing of his mother by his father. Kids who experience this level of trauma need intensive help and support, and we need to make sure that they get it, from wherever it may be best available.


Judge Borchers’ position should be assessed: CAALAS
Alex, on June 22, 2017 at 11:44 am you said, and I quote: “If your PART-TIME advocacy programme co-ordinator did her job after this child’s court appearance in March, then he wouldn’t have appeared in court again in May.”
So you cast an aspersion on her. It is entirely unwarranted.
Don’t wriggle out, apologise.


Be Sociable, Share!