@3 No, it doesn’t follow, and no, it wouldn’t. Any …

Comment on Todd River: will we stand by and let the worst happen? by Rod Cramer.

@3 No, it doesn’t follow, and no, it wouldn’t. Any small boy playing in the mud could work that out. All it might do, is reduce the extra time (measured in seconds) it would take for the water to reach your power points.
Go and check out the “biodiversity” in the Todd south of Alice.
I always marvel at the stupidity of landlubbers compared to sailors – the latter learn on about day one that you can’t change the sea. Yet when we are on land we think we can change (“tame”) the land, and all will be right. We are fooled when we make miniscule changes here and there, into thinking it’s good and lasting. It never ever is, and rather than creating a “museum”, we could be helping the country to heal itself, by rectifying the many mistakes we have made.

Rod Cramer Also Commented

Todd River: will we stand by and let the worst happen?
@4 Why can’t the Todd be a “wild bush river” AND open public space in the heart of an urban setting? Get rid of the buffel, couch etc and illegal activities, and the river will do most of the work.
Dredging the Todd will do nothing to help the egress of floods through the Gap, although there may be other reasons for doing it.
There are two primary things that cause the problems at the Gap. Firstly, Spencer and Gillen describe the Heavitree Gap as having sand from cliff face to cliff face. Today close on a third of that width is taken up with a rail and a road embankment (the latter was widened considerably in about 1982-84).
Secondly, the level of the current Heavitree Causeway is at least a metre higher than the original sand bed of the Todd. This has been the case for a similar time. A major upgrade occurred in 1980, and then repaired after the 1983 flood.
While there are some future issues with removing fallen timber from the Todd, it should not be for any one person’s interpretation of aesthetics (perhaps we need a blunt reminder of what we’ve lost). For example, the Casino causeway, installed in dubious circumstances in the same era, increases local flood levels, and any debris (including fallen timber) upstream of it can increase this problem dramatically.
The obvious logical answers are to remove/rectify the causes, which are definitely not sand and fallen timber.

Recent Comments by Rod Cramer

Tom Cleary: Cattle man with a huge smile
Tom was certainly one of those folk, that if you only met him once or twice, and even if only for a few minutes, you will never ever forget him, and for all the right reasons.

Art Trail, Explorer’s Way: big words, so far no substance
A long way north of Pt Augusta, about 190 klm’s in fact.

Miners oppose call for land holders’ veto rights
Spot on “Barkley Magpie”. Trouble is, it’s not just the big issues the miners don’t do the right thing on, and consequently leave mayhem behind them for the pastoralists.
Such things as track rehab that consists of nothing more than a branch or goondie placed across the start of their soilcon disasters, or small aquifers damaged by their dodgy drillers, the list is long and depressing.

CLP pre-selects Steve Brown for Araluen
I’ve just been shocked back into reality as to why I haven’t missed JB’s diatribe. Second sentence; as I recall it was Labour that set up all the ducks for Kilgariff. Etc.

Praise for $24m overpass over the top
Remember folks, this was Federal money.
While this may be the last level crossing on the Stuart Hwy in the NT, it’s not the last on the Adelaide to Darwin line over the Stuart Highway.
Anyone genuinely concerned about safety would have attended to the one 50 km north of Pt Augusta first – it is at a seriously oblique angle, and somewhere trains would be at maximum speed, unlike our overpass, where they are just entering / leaving a 50 km/h restriction.

Be Sociable, Share!