@ Olga and Hal. The ABS definition of NILF: “Persons …

Comment on NT needs someone to ‘call things honestly’ says Havnen … by Kieran Finnane.

@ Olga and Hal. The ABS definition of NILF: “Persons Not in the Labour Force are people who are neither employed nor unemployed in a particular reference period.” That is, as I understand people who do not have a job of any sort and are not looking for work. But that does not mean they have no income support from Centrelink. They might, for instance, be receiving parenting or carer or disability payments. I have put in questions to both Centrelink and ABS to get further information.

Kieran Finnane Also Commented

NT needs someone to ‘call things honestly’ says Havnen …
Olga, I’m not contesting that the NILF stats are high, nor that they are a cause for concern. I’m simply saying they are not a measure of income. They are a measure of not being employed (whether full-time or part-time) and not ‘unemployed’, ie not looking for work. The ABS has a separate statistical measure for income and in the example I give, for the Central Desert area, ‘nil income’ was nowhere near 60%. For men 15 years and over, 73 reported ‘nil income’ out of 1306, which by my calculation is 5.6%.


Recent Comments by Kieran Finnane

To die for country
@ John Bell: Dr Nelson’s message about equality is clearly expressed in his words that I have cited, about Australians all being “equal – irrespective of politics, race or religion”.
On reflection, his meaning when he said “they denied their Aboriginality to fight and die for the young nation”, is likely referring to those who enlisted either having found a way around their exclusion from the armed forces on the basis of their race, or having had their Aboriginal descent overlooked. “Denied their Aboriginality” seems to me an unfortunate choice of words to cover these circumstances.
Readers may be interested in further details on this topic in an article on the War Memorial’s site:
https://www.awm.gov.au/articles/indigenous-service/report-executive-summary


No gaol for Peace Pilgrims: sentence
Phil, They did indeed suffer consequence, as the article above and the series of reports from the trials make clear. For victimless acts of civil disobedience they were tried under harsh Cold War era legislation, facing maximum penalties of seven years imprisonment. This hung over them for a year.
They were found guilty and were sentenced, proportionately to the nature of the offence and their circumstances. Fines ranged between $5000 and $1250. Considerable penalties for people who live their lives in voluntary simplicity, without substantial income, and in service of those in need.


The ‘tough gig’ of doing things the right way
Thanks for the correction, Alex. I will amend the story accordingly.
I should also add that the demolition of the abandoned house, and the subsequent fencing of the site was done by way of compensation to custodians, after a telecom tower was erected on top of the range at the Gap without their permission.


No extraordinary emergency at Pine Gap: judge rules
Mr Bell. This is what Mr McHugh said, after mentioning that there are limits on protests and referring to civil disobedience: “Notwithstanding, for example, what the Suffragettes did in giving women the vote in the early 1900s. Australia was one of the first countries in the world, I think, to allow that. There were civil disobedience matters in respect of those occurrences. Of course, the law has changed and so it should be.”
That sounds to me like a case for justifying civil disobedience rather than a case for accepting the limits to protest, which is what he was speaking to the jury about.


Master plan could turn around population and economic slump
Eden, are you aware of the Northern Institute’s research briefs, which can be found here:

http://www.cdu.edu.au/northern-institute/ni-research-briefs

Many of them deal with demographic issues. The last one specific to Alice Springs, however, seems to be from 2013.


Be Sociable, Share!