Council wants to save water but doesn’t like the word ‘rules’

By KIERAN FINNANE

 

If the Town Council is a barometer of public opinion, Alice Water Smart may have some trouble with getting the community to warm to “water rules”. Council has been asked to nominate a representative to the Citizens’ Advisory Panel on the development of the rules. As previously reported here, the rules are not intended to be compulsory, more a set of guidelines drawn up through a community consultation process.

 

But words matter and Councillor Steve Brown led the debate with his objection to the use of the term “water rules”. Alice Water Smart has “no mandate” to impose rules, he said, and a term such as “advice” would be amore appropriate. Water use rules would be a matter for the NT Government, not for a voluntary body of citizens, he said.

 

Council is a partner in the Water Smart consortium, as Mayor Damien Ryan pointed out. CEO Rex Mooney understood councillors’ difficulty with the word ‘rules’ but said that it would be best for council to have someone, preferably an elected member, “around the table” on this issue.

 

Cr Liz Martin also thought that the word ‘rules’ would sound “overbearing” for the community; and as such rules can’t be “governed and enforced”, calling them “initiatives” might be better.

 

Cr Eli Melky expressed his concerns, referring to the current marketing of the concept as “almost like a political campaign”. It doesn’t show where or how any rules would be “policed”, he said, asking, “why should the people of Alice Springs follow them?”. “Water awareness is a good thing” but the council should “distance” itself from the notion of ‘rules’. Nonetheless he supported having a council representative¬† on the advisory panel.

 

Mayor Ryan understood the misgivings around the term but compared the situation to council’s involvement with Alice Solar City and its “champions” program. He suggested that “a big part of the community will want to play in this space” and that council would need to have at least an officer on the advisory panel.

 

Greens Councillor Jade Kudrenko was also “uncomfortable” with the word ‘rules’ but said what Water Smart is trying to achieve is “positive”. She was of the view that an environment officer, if council had one, would have been an ideal representative on the advisory panel. Mayor Ryan appeared nettled by this: he didn’t think it would be the role of an environment officer to write rules. (Council has an environment officer whose role appeared to have been confined to landfill management matters.)¬† Mayor Ryan preferred the idea of having council’s Works Manager, Scott Allen, at the table.

 

Cr Dave Douglas, who had attended a recent Waterwise function for schools, presenting its various awards, had been “very impressed” by the schools’ water savings. While he was also against the notion of ‘rules’, he said saving water was a good conclusion in the long run.

 

In the end, Cr Melky was nominated, and accepted, to represent council on the advisory panel. Mayor Ryan summed up “the mood in the room”: council is interested in saving water but not in having “rules”.

 

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Sharon Humphry
    Posted January 4, 2013 at 8:30 pm

    I lived in Alice for 10 years and had not had to worry about water as it comes from the artesian basin. So what’s all the fuss about? Stop wasting our money by polluting our TV and wasting money on stupid advertising.

    View Comment
  2. Hal Duell
    Posted October 31, 2012 at 7:27 am

    This was a very interesting debate on Monday night. After suspending standing orders so counsellors could express freely what they were thinking, two nearly unanimous sentiments emerged. The Alice Springs Town Council does want to be represented on the Citizens Advisory Panel being convened by Alice Water Smart, but the word “rules” has to go.
    Hopefully those running Alice Water Smart will take this message on board. “Rules” imply an authority to impose and enforce, something they do not have. And of equal importance, their very timely move to save and conserve Alice’s water for future generations could lose momentum if they don’t hear what Council is asking.
    I suspect Council is in tune with the larger community here. Most of us shy away from rules, especially new ones. There are better words that will generate more support for this important initiative.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*