No need to beef up by-laws: public behaviour better

By KIERAN FINNANE

 

The Alice Springs Town Council look set to knock on the head a move to double the penalties for some public places by-law breaches, initiated by Councillor Geoff Booth a year ago.

 

At last night’s committee meeting only Cr Eli Melky backed Cr Booth on increasing the penalties and even he wanted to see some by-laws taken out of consideration – 26(2) Camping without a permit and 36 (3) Making fire without a permit. Cr Booth accepted the exclusion of 26 (2) but still did not win support.

 

Cr Brendan Heenan tried to get a further compromise up, proposing to exclude also 74(3) Providing false identification, 75 (2) Failing to provide evidence of identity without reasonable excuse and 75 (4) Failing to provide evidence of identity within prescribed time.  His move was dropped for procedural reasons.

 

The remaining by-laws targeted by Cr Booth were 41 (3) Depositing litter, 47 (2) Drinking liquor, 48 (2) Possessing opened liquor container, 50(2) Causing nuisance, 51(2) Behaving indecently. Penalties for breaches of all of these at present stand at $423, except for 50(2) for which the penalty is $282.

 

Cr Booth (left, at his induction) said his aim was not to increase revenue through fine collection but to “change habits”. Both he and Cr Melky argued that the town continues to “endure” (Cr Melky) unwanted behaviour, but Mayor Damien Ryan, Crs Jade Kudrenko and Liz Martin, and Director of Corporate and Community Services Craig Catchlove were all of the view that there has been a marked improvement.

 

Cr Booth based his argument on council’s record of infringement notices issued: 26 in the month of August this year, compared to 14 last year. All months this year showed an increase except for April during which only one notice was issued compared to 12 last year. In January this year, 377 were issued compared to nine the year before.

 

The caution notices issued showed a different picture: the numbers are small anyway, but markedly fewer have been issued this year, including one in August compared to 27 in the same month last year.

 

The other picture council gets is from the river runs conducted each day by their rangers for the last two years, compared to once or twice a week previously. Again since March there have been markedly fewer people “spoken to”: 73 adults in March 2013 compared to 287 in March 2012; 59 in August 2013 compared to 237 in August 2012.

 

Out of public places into town camps

 

Mr Catchlove said anti-social behaviour is at the lowest level he has seen since he has been in the job. He put this down to the increased resourcing and activity of council rangers, out in public places on a daily basis, seven days a week, three shifts a day. He said “the behaviour” seems to have shifted to the town camps; he was not going to comment about that, but from “our perspective” the rangers have been doing an “amazingly good job”.

 

His report said the daily interactions of rangers and other services with illegal campers lead to most of them moving to the Apmere Mwere Accommodation Park (on Len Kittle Drive south of The Gap) and into the town camps.

 

Cr Melky thought increases would send a message about “how strongly” the community feels about unacceptable behaviour. He said it is a difficult issue to talk about because it can easily be seen as racist, as most of the people in breach are Indigenous.

Mayor Ryan said council showed it was serious about anti-social behaviour when it put the by-laws in place but he “firmly believes” that they are sufficient in their present form to deal with the current situation. He wanted to get the issue “off the books”.

 

Cr Brown expressed his support for the by-laws but not for increased penalties. If anything, lower fines could be paid out of people’s pockets while fines of $1000 ($1410 was proposed for the ID by-law breaches) would be “unattainable”.

 

Cr Kudrenko, observing that “things seem better to me”, said she never has and never will support an increase, commenting on the disparity between the nature of the offences and the penalties proposed and referring to Mr Catchlove’s report on the issue, which suggested that the penalties are “already high” and “probably among the highest in Australia”.

 

Cr Booth challenged her on the apparent contradiction between this stance and her support for increased penalties for supermarkets on trolley by-law breaches.

 

Cr Kudrenko said there was a big difference between dealing with big corporations like Coles and Woolworths and “some of the most marginalised people” in the community for whom an increase in fines in any case would not make a difference because of their inability to pay.

 

Deputy-Mayor Liz Martin said that improved behaviour generally is about education, engagement and creating changes over the long-term. She has observed “the biggest change” over the last two years around her living- and workplace, The Road Transport Hall of Fame, south of The Gap.

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Posted September 25, 2013 at 11:27 pm

    If we really want to seek a level playing field for penalties and fines we need to do it as a percentage of income, i.e. 3 weeks wage / salary.
    These calculations need to be based on a person’s PRE-TAX income as some citizens are more capable of reducing their taxable income than others.
    Furthermore, one littering fine for Bill Gates should see the town become the most well serviced municipality in the world, overnight.
    The town now starts to await its very own jackpot fine.
    Now another link of government revenue to tax returns, I would not like to be doing the bookwork on this one, but it sure would start a revolution!

    View Comment
  2. Janet Brown
    Posted September 18, 2013 at 8:25 am

    Where is community inclusion in all of this. @ R Henry I am with you. Fines should be at a level that can be paid from the pocket of the lowest paid in our community. The higher the penalty the more devastation and hostility is the only result. If the fines are too high and they are not paid the person loses their driver’s licence and in turn cannot pay registrations on their vehicle until the fines are paid.
    What sort of behaviour are our governments participating in that would deliberately criminalise the most venerable in our communities.
    I am glad this increase was rejected. We need to work on programs and advertising that assist in community involvement at all levels.

    View Comment
  3. R Henry
    Posted September 17, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    The British had an Empire but they lost it because the only solution they could come up with for any problems was get a bigger stick or whack harder
    and it didn’t work for them either.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*