Sorry, Interested, I missed your question. The answer given by …

Comment on Zoning approval for White Gums subdivision by Steve Brown.

Sorry, Interested, I missed your question. The answer given by Alex is certainly part of the plan, there are a few options on the table and nothing finalized as of yet.
However one way or another the town water supply will be connected to the project and, yes, of course that will be very expensive. The various projects have to be large enough to cover those costs.

Steve Brown Also Commented

Zoning approval for White Gums subdivision
Gee, horrified times two. You are not meant to take it so literally. I was simply trying to demonstrate to blind Freddy that in the great scheme of things 15 is a very low number.
Clearly for some at least I failed in that en devour.
Yes, you do have to enter a objection to be counted as an objection, further more you actually have to be brave enough to give your name and address which will then be on the public record.
So get some practice. Next time you want to make a comment be brave enough to use your real names.

Zoning approval for White Gums subdivision
Melanie Alice Springs has a population of just under 29,000. 15 fifteen objections adds up to a whopping .05%!
To make up just 1% there would need to be 289 objections!
A “No” comment as offered by the 99.95% is considered as having no objection therefore by default a “Yes”.
We still live in a democracy, Melanie! There will always be someone opposed to every development proposal, if we took them into account nothing would ever happen and you, Melanie, would be out of a job, of a place to live and something to eat.
I’m sure that you will also be very pleased to know that most of the objections can and in some cases already have been, answered at least to some degree. Where we can, we are only too happy to make adjustments to suit. As for a business plan, Melanie it’s none of your business!
And you wouldn’t know what one was if it bit you on the backside anyway, in your world “The Gubberment” does everything doesn’t it? Oh and we are very pleased that the Minister signed off on this re-zoning – it wouldn’t be legitimate if he hadn’t!
I know it comes as a hell of a shock to some of you, but there really is such a thing as private enterprise. People who get off their proverbial take risk and try and achieve. I apologize to those resting on their backsides who may feel threatened by that, “don’t panic”, we are not asking for your assistance!
So take a break, put your feet up and watch, if we fail you’ll have something to laugh about, if we succeed Alice Springs gets the benefit!
As for the Conspiracy comment by Jones … The level of intelligence it took to come up with that one is just plain frightening. Just who do you suppose puts all the dollars, time [years of it] and energy into arguing the case for these projects?
And if we didn’t believe in their viability why would we bother? Why wouldn’t we just put up the case for something else if that’s what we thought would work?

Zoning approval for White Gums subdivision
@ Jones “Huh”? Maybe the bush and Alice Springs itself is not the place for you.
Your comment suggest a strategic withdrawal to the coast may be appropriate. However while that may suit your personal desires I would point out to you that there are many Centralians who actually love living here.
Our project is aimed at them and has already attracted much enthusiastic interest.
It will not consist of a line of tents flapping in the breeze as Bush fires and pestilence unknown approaches as apparently you imagine it. It will however consist of beautifully appointed cabins in a village style with all encompassing club like community center, all services provided, all in a spectacular bush setting among the ranges.
Pastoralists are also counting on us achieving this and are lining up to buy.

Recent Comments by Steve Brown

1 Territory too fixed on opposition to fracking: Lambley
Unfortunately for us Territorians Terry and Robyn don’t represent answers, a way forward for Territorians.
They do in fact represent the leftovers of the failed Mills / Giles Government who escaped the judgement of the people by jumping ship, turning their backs on their own Government, distancing themselves from the infighting, claiming victim hood, bla bla bla, while in fact they themselves were amongst the very worst worst offenders!
Examples: The massive 30% jump in energy prices completely.
Another Mills infliction is the Last Resort Home Insurance Scheme which has just about destroyed the Home Building Industry.
The withdrawal of nearly all youth funding and putting nothing back in the desperately needed space. Bad decisions like these didn’t come from CLP policy! They came from Terry and Robyn.
Now, instead of making themselves useful holding government to account as independents, they attack the CLP opposition, of two!
Why? Not because they are looking after the interests of Territorians, that’s for certain.
It’s because they envy the extra funding that goes to the Opposition – their argument, so that they “can be more effective”!
How’s that? By replacing a party Opposition of Two, with two sworn independents.
Yeh, but they’re willing to forgo the independent stuff to form another, perfectly believable party so they can!
Looks like the ego driven infighting that destroyed our last government; looks like the rats that jumped overboard found each other and surprise, surprise, the resulting interaction produces exactly the same outcome!
The last thing the Territory needs is another party headed by a megalomaniac intent on personal glory!
The last CLP government wasn’t ripped apart because people disagreed about direction. It was ripped apart by egotistical wankers who believe they should be leaders!
A huge amount of the damage done to the party was by one Terry Millis attempting to hold on to, then to regain his leadership without the slightest regard for the damage done to the lives of Territorians in the process.

Voice to Parliament: Scandinavia can do it, why not Australia?
Excuse me for asking what might appear to be an absurd question, but where in the hell do you suppose everybody else on earth, who isn’t identified as being a first people, come from?
Further: Given that our DNA clearly demonstrates we are all related and interrelated many times over how is it possible for any of us to be more first than another, and just how far back do you trace a claim to be first, in some particular place?
We know with absolute certainty that those claiming to be first locally have replaced others who clearly would have thought they were first, well except for the one they replaced, and so on and on it goes … making the whole concept of first peoples another tragic joke in the history of struggle for equality.
It results in further isolation, greater community division, and will tragically overtime worsen outcomes for those isolated.
I believe the “First Peoples” concept is in reality just another backwards paternalistic step part of a tragic community illness called Apartheid.
So the question must be asked, why would the United Nations after setting out the case for equality of all human beings then set about arguing a case for some to be more equal than others, judgement made on the basis of their race?
Unless the true intent of the UN is to create division, for that most certainly will be the outcome.

Code of conduct allegations ‘vexatious, frivolous’ – councillor
@ Eli: Was that meant to be a clever political barb? LOL, you missed the mark by just a bit. I chose not to run for council, no regrets, and I have no ego driven feelings of political relevance one way or another.
What motivates me is anger! Anger at the sheer bloody mayhem, dysfunction and loss of opportunity that has become the norm in the Territory, brought about by the quality of people we have been electing to fulfil the very responsible roles of guiding the Territory’s future.
Instead of electing calm, mature candidates with a level of local knowledge and practical commonsense knowhow, we, and at council level, a corrupted system, have tended to elect personalities, based on their media profiles [and] very little local knowledge and often motivated not so much by the needs of Territorians as by career interests and in some cases utterly shameless self promotion.
Recently you and Jimmy [Cocking] have been tearfully suggesting foul play, that you are victims, being shut down and silenced. Yet you won’t speak publicly to back up those statements. Why Not?
You have been charged while acting in a role that is owned by the public.
They are entitled to an explanation!
There is no legal reason why you cannot do so! If you believe the public’s interests are being impinged it is “in the public interest” to have a full explanation.
So, from where I sit, Eli, it appears you won’t go there because open disclosure may not support your publicly declared statements about bullying, victimhood and a denial of free speech.

Code of conduct allegations ‘vexatious, frivolous’ – councillor
I had no intention of wasting precious energy on old ground but since you went there Eli, I will too.
However what I am not going to waste my time trying to explain to you or your mate who posted earlier why the electoral system is undemocratic.
You sat through the same lectures I did on the subject if you’d listened you would already understand.
To the code of conduct stuff, Jimmy made a complaint via a letter to council asking that I be charged for a breech of the code.
I was summoned by the CEO just like yourself Eli, in that meeting.
I informed the CEO that I did not recognise the Code of Conduct, that I would not apologise to Jimmy for calling him and Enviro Nazi in an comment to the Alice Springs News Online because the term was in general usage at the time. It still is, and I thought it applicable to Jimmy’s politics. I still do, and further that I thought the Code was undemocratic and a threat to free speech.
I assured the CEO that I would challenge it all the way to the top and that I was perfectly willing to face the local government authority to do so, and that in fact I was looking forward to the opportunity having received support for challenging the Code of conduct all the way to the top of the NT Government at the time, because they also saw it as an attempt to hinder my right to free speech.
The CEO informed me that he would take it to open council.
I did not object as I was more than happy to face the music, in the full glare of the public’s gaze. It was put to council. I restated my case and that I would not apologise to council [which] including yourself, Eli, chose not to further the complaint.
More’s the pity.
I would have enjoyed the fight because that what it would have been, because Eli, I was unafraid of defending my actions in public and I was most certainly prepared to resign from council as a matter of principle over the issue.
The question remains, how come you and Jimmy haven’t done the same?
Could it be that the charges laid against you might give the public a little more understanding of just who the bully in the pack is?
That’s how it looks from my point of view.
Come on Eli, fess up, let’s deal with this story in the open!

Black money
Good article Ed and very good comment Evelyne, something that every Territorian should read and pay heed to, particularly our Government institutions and NGOs.
For presently we are the home of institutionalised Paternalistic Apartheid which in its condescending manner denies the right of individuality to its citizens of Aboriginal origins and penalises the rights of those who are not.
It is a deliberate and ongoing act of separation by race. Attempting to deliver different levels of service, law, protection and health all on the basis of that race. Sanctimoniously claiming the high morale ground, outwardly exuding care and compassion, while in reality simply justifying the division in order to protect the status quo, guarding against any potential threat to long established funding streams which feed that vast parasitic industry of apartheid, which has grown up around the divide!

Be Sociable, Share!