Lamenting lines of life sentence and lifestyle choices

p2206-Yeperenye-CentreCOMMENT by ERWIN CHLANDA

 

There is much wailing and gnashing of teeth at the moment by people who are well employed and salaried, speaking out on behalf of those who are not.

 

One laments is about Nigel Scullion’s “work for the dole life sentence” statement, as it is labelled in a media release of the Central Land Council (CLC).

 

That was followed by Tony Abbott’s “lifestyle” remark: How, so say some commentators, dare he compare the serious business of living in a remote outstation (devoid of adequate health and education services, job opportunities, law and order, housing, entertainment, and so on) at taxpayers’ expense, with a tree change or sea change by some Yuppie (who pays for it out of his or her own pocket)?

 

Another outrage is articulated by Jenny Bedford, the CEO of the Institute of Aboriginal Development (IAD), saying it may need to close because of funding cuts.

 

Locals will remember when the NT Government set up the Desert Knowledge Precinct, in a bid to save costs and create economies of scale, and encouraged Batchelor College, the Centre for Appropriate Technology and IAD to relocate there.

 

Batchelor and CAT did but IAD didn’t. It wanted to have its own little empire. It spent around $5m in public money to re-develop part of its complex on its prime South Terrace site.

 

No-one would complain if that money had been well spent. Readers commenting on our report last week doubt that is the case.

 

Ms Bedford was not available to answer questions on Friday nor this morning. We’ll report any replies when and if we get them from her.

 

Neither Senator Scullion nor Prime Minister Abbott, of course, are advocating the removal of Aboriginal people from the land they own outright (in the Territory that is half the landmass).

 

They are simply joining the decades-old debate about how much the taxpayer should be contributing to sustain people whose lifestyle choice – what other word can be used? – is to live on their tribal lands.

 

The CLC bluster, issued also on behalf of the Aboriginal Peak Organisations of the NT, says “we sought bi-partisan support for our comprehensive remote employment and enterprise development proposal in 2011 … yet it continues to languish while the Minister resigns himself to eternal unemployment out bush.”

 

While this proposal clearly didn’t get a take-up, did everything in matters of employment and enterprise development, within the ambit of the land councils, need to grind to a halt? Surely not.

 

We put the following questions to the CLC, the biggest shareholder in Centrecorp which controls investments worth a reputed $100m plus, and its Centrefarm:-

 

• What happened with the citrus plantation proposed for Utopia some 20 years ago?

 

• How come the pruning and picking at the Rocky Hill vineyard is done by Vietnamese from the Riverland?

 

• Why is Titjikala’s five star tourist project defunct?

 

• Why is the Finke vineyard no longer there?

 

• Why do backpackers harvest the produce at the Ali Curung plantation?

 

• How many Aboriginal people worked at the Ti Tree plantations when they were still active?

 

• How many small enterprises employing mostly Aboriginal people has Centrefarm created in the 250,000 square kilometers of Aboriginal-owned Central Australia?

 

• How many Aboriginal people have permanent jobs with businesses owned by Centrecorp, or operating from premises it owns, and what percentage of the total staff does that make up?

 

• Have profitable tourism, agricultural or horticultural businesses been established in the Golden Mile west of town, a short drive on bitumen from Alice, and well served with water, electricity and phone infrastructure provided by the taxpayer?p2222-IAD

 

• How many of the cattle stations bought for Aborigines (advise the number, please) are profitable enterprises run by Aborigines, not counting those leased by white neighbours?

 

That was emailed on March 4. No answer yet. If and when we get it you’ll be the first to know.

 

So what was it that had failed to attract bi-partisan support in 2011?

 

The CLC points out it was a report called “Creating and Supporting Sustainable Livelihoods: A Proposal for a New Remote Participation, Employment & Enterprise Development Scheme” prepared – it will come as no surprise – with a grant from the public purse.

 

Its executive summary suggests a three tier initiative:

 

• Tier 1: Participants can engage in activities that develop and maintain formative skills and experience for sustainable livelihoods.

 

• Tier 2: “Participants and providers design a livelihood pathway that is tailored to meet the aspirations and capabilities of the participant.”

 

• Tier 3: A participant is engaged directly in the employment or enterprise opportunity identified in their livelihood pathway.

 

A level of income and activity support is “basic” in Tier 1, “higher” in Tier 2 and in the initial period of Tier 3, “intensive” as “Government, employers and enterprises combine to contribute to the participant’s income”.

 

The report is calling for “wage subsidies for driving participation”. It draws on “evidence that, where managed well, wages and top up have been effective tools”.

 

It is noteworthy that the demand for labour (see above), present or potential, doesn’t rate a mention in the process of participants “identifying their livelihood pathway”.

 

However, “local enterprise development and commercial opportunities will be identified and supported.

 

Government services should “genuinely favour local employment”.

 

“Where managed well, wages and top up have been effective tools for engaging otherwise unemployed individuals in productive and educational activity and assisting them into non-CDEP jobs, where possible, over time.”

 

Participants are encouraged to enter, move through and eventually exit the scheme (in the latter case for mainstream employment where possible), by using a system of incentives coupled with a mechanism similar to CDEP’s “no work no pay”.

 

The report wants “single, place-based service providers who are on the ground in local communities on an ongoing basis [who] have an intimate knowledge of the local and regional economy” while “visiting services are a poor substitute”.

 

The length of provider contracts should be extended to five years.

 

The “livelihoods” will depend on a mix of activities including engagement with the market economy (such as through private and public sector employment and social enterprise) and, in many cases, continued public investment.

 

Empowerment of the disadvantaged individual or community to determine their own livelihood pathways should:-

 

• have long term and flexible programming;

 

• have responsive and participatory planning and implementation;

 

• have activity-focussed partnerships between disadvantaged people, their organisations, the public sector, the non-government sector and the private sector;

 

• employ disaggregated strategies that address identifiable sub-groups (women, youth, the disabled);

p2222L-J-Hooker-Yeperenye

• have outcome-based monitoring and evaluation.

 

You can find the full report here.

 

The CLC does not explain why it is not mobilising the massive resources of Centrecorp to implement the recommendations of the report that it touts as the solution to the dearth of employment and enterprises in the bush.

 

“The concept for the establishment of Centrecorp arose in the early 1980s,” says the company’s website.

 

“At the time, the Central Land Council was considering how to establish an investment corporation that would allow Aboriginal people to participate commercially in the inevitable resource and tourism development projects that were just beginning to establish themselves in the Northern Territory, rather than simply observing this development take place around them.

 

“The shareholders of Centrecorp are CLC (3 shares), Congress (2 shares) and Tangentyere Council (2 shares).”

 

The site lists Centrecorp’s “principal investments” as Peter Kittle Motor Company, Yeperenye Shopping Centre & other properties, LJ Hooker Alice Springs, Milner Road Foodtown, Chifley Alice Springs Resort, Alice Springs Memorial Club property and properties at 75 and 82 Hartley Street.

 

IMAGES: Centrecorp investments (from top): Yeperenye supermarket, L J Hooker, the IAD site in South Terrace, on the banks of the Todd River, and Peter Kittle Motor Company.

p2221-Peter-Kittle-webad

 

Be Sociable, Share!

11 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Not Golden
    Posted March 31, 2015 at 10:14 pm

    @4 Peter. I would love to see a house that cost “close to a million dollars” at the Golden Mile.
    And just because one bloke says he didn’t get paid for “this and that” – I don’t even care who he was.
    But as I said, 90% of us work. So in your “reading of my account” that’s all you could come up with? You obviously only see what you want to see in it.

    View Comment
  2. Suzanne Visser
    Posted March 25, 2015 at 3:21 pm

    Finke’s community gardens are not there anymore because the then CEO of the Shire decided they did not want to pay the $10,000 per year water bill for watering the plants.
    This was decided AFTER the whole thing went in, infrastructure, plants, the lot.
    Now THAT’s cynical, isn’t it?

    View Comment
  3. Janet Brown
    Posted March 23, 2015 at 2:18 pm

    IAD: When I worked for employment agencies people who I signed up to do courses would come in with their certificates and show me and then proceed to tell me that no one picked them up for the courses and they never went.
    But hey, IAD did the right thing, got their funding by supplying certificates to people who signed up for the courses.
    All boxes ticked. Outcomes achieved. Just that most if not all those people never attended or contributed to the courses. Money well spent on educating our job seekers.

    View Comment
  4. Pagan
    Posted March 23, 2015 at 11:40 am

    Everyone is quick to get on to the bandwagon about all the help there is in town for the underprivileged.
    How do you become underprivileged? By not bothering to get an education, by not bothering to get a job.
    Government employees in government departments come to hold your hand and show you what you are entitled to, even you have never worked or even tried to make a better life for yourself or families. Choices, as Abbott said, are yours.

    View Comment
  5. Peter
    Posted March 18, 2015 at 3:29 pm

    @2 “Not Golden”: Reading your account I was reminded of my visit to one of the Golden Mile residences a few years back.
    I found myself at a house that must have cost close to a million dollars to build and was set in its own beautiful and exclusive landscape.
    I would kill to live there.
    Then one of the residents started complaining about it.
    He told me that he wasn’t paid to look after the house, he had to get things fixed himself and he had done a lot of work on the garden but had never received a wage for it.
    He seemed to be quite bitter about this ‘injustice’.

    View Comment
  6. Scotty
    Posted March 17, 2015 at 10:35 pm

    Well, an Aboriginal organisation bought the Memo Club. Doing very well at educating and being responsible for their culture.
    Wait up, being drunk passed out on RFDS lawns is not a productive influence.
    I forgot, they can get their pay check every fortnight and continue to drink that government funded money away.
    Hope they win the Memo raffle – kangaroo tail I was informed.
    Not bagging out just Memo Club if you think I am.
    Plenty of drunks are staggering out of [another venue], as usual.
    Responsible service of alcohol, no doubt.

    View Comment
  7. "Not Golden"
    Posted March 17, 2015 at 10:16 pm

    As for “The Golden Mile” west of Alice, some of us did try to set up a tourism business but could never get $$.
    I completed a business plan and studied business management. As for agriculture and horticulture, there is hardly enough land between Larapinta Dve and the surrounding ranges. Most of this land is filled with housing all the way up to Standley Chasm.
    Yes, we have access to power, water and telephone services. Yes, these were provided with government $$. But we have always Paid top $$ for these services, thank you very much.
    And for your information at least 90% of residents on this “The Golden Mile” are employed in Alice Springs in many Sectors of the Workforce, Health, Education, Justice System and many more. Most are highly qualified in their positions too.
    It’s the same old story, we were given $$ for shonky building contractors / consultants etc to build so called livable accommodation. (Some houses are 20+ yrs old and have never had necessary upgrades of plumbing, wiring etc).
    No further housing has gone up since the 1990s, when the water pipeline was built and the powerline came through.
    There is nothing “Golden” here I can tell you.
    Yep, we’re close to town on a bitumen road, but we still get ripped off and told we are considered remote from service providers in and out of Alice Springs.
    We work hard and have great respect for this homelands we live on, and we most certainly know it can be taken off us at the drop of a hat.
    But for now, this is where we have raised / and will continue to raise our children / grandchildren to become respectable young people. (They don’t know what walking the streets of Alice is).
    And yes, we would like to have successful businesses in operation, but in reality that is not going to happen.
    There is probably a population of 200+ living on “The Golden Mile” and about 60 houses, that’s a lot of repairs and maintenance and services needed there, and like I said we pay top $$ for everything.
    We DO NOT live for free, and where in Alice Springs will there be 60 available houses for us to live in if we were not out here? Yes, we would probably be living in overcrowded dwellings like community people are in town.
    Residents of “The Golden Mile” young and old, alive and deceased, have made enormous contributions to the whole community of Alice Springs and other areas.
    It seems as though nobody wants to know of the success stories, they’d rather rant about the losses. In the meantime we will continue to do our best.

    View Comment
  8. Bruce
    Posted March 17, 2015 at 12:30 pm

    Seems that the best “Lifestyle Choices” were made by the directors of Centrecorp, Central Land Council, Congress and Tangentyere Council.

    View Comment
  9. Another Observer
    Posted March 17, 2015 at 11:28 am

    How much tax (either via rates or federally) do the principal investments contribute?
    I find it interesting that we have a large number of people around Alice who tell us constantly about the good works that these organisations / companies do – but where is the evidence of this??
    There are an awful lot of vested interests constantly rattling the begging bowl – but we still have kids who can never take their place in society because they don’t know how to read and write.
    Whilst we have highly paid individuals who will gladly put together a whole heap of motherhood statements to talk the talk – there doesn’t appear to anyone willing to walk the walk!

    View Comment
  10. Fred
    Posted March 16, 2015 at 7:41 pm

    In any business you need to have people with the will to work.

    View Comment
  11. Lou Hayes
    Posted March 16, 2015 at 3:24 pm

    IAD has a long history in training and educating many Aboriginal people, yes they wanted to stay on Arrernte land so what!
    Are we really going to pick on Aboriginal organisations who were looking to the IAS to expand on their expertise in the provision of culturally appropriate training to provide further training and employment for Indigenous people.
    Let’s now forget that these organisations help Aboriginal people greatly.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*