@ Sandy: I agree, the ABC is more commie than …

Comment on Comic take on clash of cultures by Nimby.

@ Sandy: I agree, the ABC is more commie than comedy. The truth cannot be told in all its glory as it is probably offensive (and funny).
The ABC would be pitiable, but its our money.
Let’s make it pay for view. The results will be very funny indeed 🙂

Recent Comments by Nimby

Uranium mining would help to save Alice: Businessmen
It should indeed be on the dinner table.
Uranium oxide is at a low and the mining industry in general is likely in the process of an interim decline.
This means that key personnel and soon, mining logistics, should be purchased relatively cheaply.
It’s a little early and more of a reconnoitre, a toe in the water.


Playing race relations for laughs
Who is paying for it?


Chamber says ‘no’ to race based tender rules
South Africa is an excellent example of what happens when you decide as a government to institute a racist policy in the name of equality.
The electricity infrastructure (Eskom) was purged of capable whites, originally employed on the basis of engineering merit, not their skin colour.
Post Mandela “Rainbow Nation” and “equality” lefty feeling no brain indoctrination, they were replaced by blacks without the requisite ability, on the basis of “Affirmative Action”, a deliberately obfuscating term meaning “jobs for blacks”, i.e. skin trumps ability.
The result is now for all to see, ironically “power failure”.
The irony is surely one of the richest in contemporary “race relations” history, if it were not for the fact that it is communist in origin, i.e. design rather than accident.
Putting people in the job merely due to skin colour is naked racist discrimination.
It is also stupid unless a member of that race is universally more meritorious for the job (e.g. an Aboriginal tribal elder, a Black Panther or a Grand Wizard of the KKK).
This sort of discrimination has no place in business tenders for government and to suggest it is a disgrace.


Town inured to Aboriginal violence: lawyer
He says he can understand the point made by Mr Giles, that if it had been a white girl there would have been a “huge national outcry”.
Possibly. More likely, if the perpetrator is white, we see outcry, especially where the perpetrator has authority and most especially where the victim is black. You’ll never hear the end of that.
Given the dwindling examples of authentic raw white on black violence, now anything will do.
As we have seen in the USA with blatant criminality by blacks, where the police officer is white (Michael Brown) or merely a person defending themselves (eg Zimmerman, half Jewish, half Hispanic) is white enough for the “racist” narrative, the media will batter us half to death with it.
For now the leftist, communist, cultural Marxist fangs are well hooked into the the levers of power.
That is why we never see much of black on black violence see the light of day in the news. It does not fit the Green-Left agenda.
Similarly, rarely will black on white violence make the news, unless extreme.
Aboriginal community violence seems to be a product of Aboriginal culture (yes, shock horror!) and its developmental effects on the individual.
Race is also associated with intelligence. This is something leftists really hate but it is scientifically validated. The discoverer of DNA himself was crucified in the media for asserting it.
Violence as a form of communication or domestic dispute resolution is much more common in less intelligent people, at least 1:1, race or no race.
A more mature approach would be to examine things as they are not as leftists want us to see in the infernally wrong-headed narrative of “equality”.
We’re all different and can’t be “made” the same.
The tragedy is that more intelligent members of the Aboriginal community are held down and violated by the less capable. This is the inverse of the usual situation. The inter-generational nature of this is very damaging.
Marcia Langton has it right.
But white-shaming the caviar communists won’t fix it.


Ice – it’s worse than any of us realise
Certain types of people will be more at risk – antisocial types and their submissive orbiters, adolescents, homosexuals, polydrug users.
This drug induces slavery, a concurrent sense of omnipotence and a desire for more as the effect decreases and the light of reality shines in. Therefore it is most profitable.
The profits largely go to organised Middle Eastern crime syndicates, funding terrorism, including the kind directed towards us, as well as, to an even greater extent, Asian, predominantly Chinese organisations, which become very rich on the back of addicted misery. North Korea also explicitly manufactures and exports to its enemies.
This drug makes people prematurely age on the inside and outside. It sends people nuts, turns them into drug sluts, hookers and crooks.
I’m not sure you can appeal to feelings with a poem on this. The effect in the brain is far more primal, in areas more associated with survival – aggression, fornication, the reward system if you will.
It probably won’t induce anything of the sort with the first few uses … for most.
From there it reliably ends badly, in a life changing way.
Very few people at risk would even read a publication like this so there seems little point with poetry.
For the few that do, Brendan McMahon’s story (Melbourne) is illustrative. Look it up and see.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/rabbits-case-gets-stranger/2005/11/24/1132703316795.html
Reality tells a much more entertaining “narrative” than a fuzzywuzzy poem written by a never user (lefty?) chump-poet.


Be Sociable, Share!