NT gas pipeline hits major snag, say anti-frackers

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

 

Sir – The Giles Government’s controversial plans for a speedy NT gas pipeline to the Eastern states are stuck at the starting blocks, with the NT Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requiring a full Environmental Impact Statement before the project can proceed.

 

The EPA says water resources, land, local infrastructure and even the safety of tourists may be negatively impacted if the pipeline proceeds:-

 

• There are risks of the project not realising its projected economic and social impacts.

 

• Potential to damage local infrastructure and impact on the safety of local users, including seasonal tourists.

 

• Potential impacts on stakeholders, including land holders including Traditional Owners.

 

The NT Government’s pipe-dream Gas Link Project, with the Chief Minister’s timeframe to have the pipeline under construction by as early as next year, now is in tatters.

 

Meanwhile analysts are casting doubt over the long-term profitability of the INPEX gas project near Darwin, and other major LNG projects.

 

Considering the predicted continuation of a depressed international gas market, this pipeline is an expensive and ill-timed foray by the NT Government, with more than $10 million already wasted.

 

The expansion of a risky shale gas industry in the Territory will put our water, people and the environment at risk for no demonstrable economic return.

 

Our concerns are not only around the risks of the pipeline itself, but of the risks from new shale gas fracking projects that this pipeline could drive across the NT, all to feed export gas terminals on the east coast.

 

The pipeline is being spruiked based on an economic myth that it will supply a shortage of east coast gas, but recent reports have shown no such shortage exists.

 

We are calling on the EPA to extend their public consultation period for the EIS Terms of Reference, to ensure all impacted stakeholders have the best chance to have their say.

 

Tanya Hall

Central Australian Frack Free Alliance

0409 886 129

 

UPDATE Sept 11, 2:40pm

 

The Alice Springs News Online asked Ms Hall to give details of the $10m government expenditure.

 

She pointed out the following item in the 2015 NT Budget, Paper 3, page 30: $9.2 million to drive private sector development of a gas pipeline connecting the Territory to the national pipeline grid to open up new markets for Territory gas producers, grow the Territory’s oil and gas sector and support the creation of new industries and employment.

 

Ms Hall also said: “Further money has been spent on advertising and regional development seminar promotion of the tender process etc through the Chief Minister’s office.”

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

One Comment (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Frank Bennett
    Posted September 20, 2015 at 2:14 pm

    Thank goodness we have strong and cohesive community sector that is prepared to stand up to this unelected Chief Minister and his CLP ship of fools.
    This is a broken party with no mandate for the type of fractious future they would seek to impose on Territorians.
    They only thing they have is cash (from the sale of public assets) and a spin machine that will say anything they are paid to say.
    At a Federal level, Abbott and Co’s vision for the future of this great country has been categorically rejected. Any CLP Ministers or voters who still think the Turnbull-led Federal Government is going to hand over the necessary cash required to build this northern pipe-dream any time soon are delusional.
    It was always a simple minded economic approach to put so much dependency into one economic sector and now those who have put their eggs in this basket need to be held accountable for the time and public moneys they’ve wasted on this blinkered view for the Territory’s future.
    Keen to hear more from the likes of Tanya Hall and other younger Centralians who can clearly articulate why we must be completely skeptical of this type of junk policy.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*