Braitling preferences ‘not a get Giles exercise’

p2348 election poster 1By ERWIN CHLANDA

 

Less than two weeks out from the election all eyes are on Braitling which has the biggest number of candidates in The Centre, and the incumbent is the Chief Minister.

 

He had pushed through the introduction of operational preferential voting, which means Territory voters no longer need to allocate preferences, presumably because Mr Giles thinks it will benefit him.

 

It’s unlikely that he will get 50% plus one of the primary vote, so the following system will kick in: The candidate with the smallest number of primary votes will be excluded and his or her preference votes – if any – will be allocated as though they were primary votes.

 

This process is continued until someone has the magic 50% of the votes left in the count plus one.

 

The outcome in Braitling will now depend on deals between the candidates who are less likely to do well, how successful they are in convincing the public to allocate preferences, and do so in a way that will harm Mr Giles.

 

At least that’s what many people had expected, but at least so far, that’s not at all they way it’s shaping.

 

Independent Phil Walcott has a nifty grasp on the strategies by virtue of having run twice before, albeit never winning a seat.

 

He drew the last spot on the ballot paper which isn’t as bad as it sounds: Rolf GerritsenProfessorial Research Fellow at the Northern Institute, says it’s worth about half of the percentage advantage, maybe 2%, compared to top position, because of the reverse donkey vote.

 

“I’m lucky not to be stuck in the pack – plenty of room to manoeuvre,” says Mr Walcott.

 

“I’m in sync with many of the Greens’ policies except the ban on live export trade. That will never win in the NT with so many families and industries reliant on it.”

 

He says he has reservations about Labor’s proposed moratorium on fracking: “I want an immediate ban on the practice. Enter the renewable energy sector.”

 

This makes it surprising that he asks voters to put Labor’s Dale Wakefield second, the Greens’ Dalton Dupuy third and leave positions four to seven blank.

 

“Given there will probably be a change in government, it seemed logical to add support to the incoming one,” says Mr Walcott.

 

At least so far he isn’t part of any close-knit cabale vowed to unseat the “Chief”.

 

Eli Melky, who brands himself as a conservative Independent, is making no preference recommendations except “if they can’t put me first I’ll asked them to put me second”.

 

Independent Jane Clark, who has stood for the Greens in the 2007 Greatorex by-election and in 2008 against Mr Giles in Braitling, says she too will not make preference recommendations.

 

She says she doesn’t want to restrict people from exercising their freedom of choice about preferences. She says they will be important as she is likely to be the first or second candidate to be excluded.

 

“I don’t see this as a ‘get Giles’ exercise,” says Ms Clark.

 

Dalton Dupuy, standing for the Greens, says his how to vote card will recommend the following order from number 2: Ms Clark, Mr Walcott, Ms Wakefield and Mr Melky with positions 6 and 7 blank.

 

Mr Dupuy says in the recent Lingiari Federal election it had become clear that Braitling “is an informed and aware electorate” which would take a dim view of attempts to manipulate voters though preference deals.

 

He says in the Greens’ preference choice the positions on fracking – against it – had been the prime consideration.

 

In Araluen, the ALP’s Adam Findlay is putting Independent and former CLP frontbencher Robyn Lambley on top (behind him, of course) of his how to vote card, ahead of the CLP’s Steve Brown.

 

Independent Alfred Gould says he is concerned that both the major parties are in favour of fracking.

 

He is still making up his mind about preferences, busy replying to “a lot of emails” on a broad range of topics including “white people and black people getting further apart,” alcohol, crime, the speed limit and the hospital.

 

In Namatjira Greens candidate Vince Forrester will direct preferences – in that order – to Independent Alan Keeling, Labor’s Chansey Paech and the CLP’s Heidi Williams.

 

Mr Keeling, standing on a one-issue platform of ending the waste hundreds of thousands of camels and turning them into a vibrant business for the bush, will not direct preferences.

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

5 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted August 26, 2016 at 2:27 pm

    So? Do leaflets matter? Can voters make their own decision without them?
    Are these expensive scraps of propaganda full of over-inflated claims and dodgy data really necessary, or in any way useful, to the running of an election?
    Why do we have to have more than one per party in our letter boxes?
    We have TV commercials and newspapers for advertising, could not the parties save money, trees and the planet all at the same time?
    The one with the note: “Sorry I missed you” makes me wonder, as I have not been out for weeks and I know no one called.
    Politicians spend a lot of dollars to convince us to trust them. But the fevered competition for votes virtually compels them to lie to us.

    View Comment
  2. Dan Murphy
    Posted August 19, 2016 at 9:46 pm

    Now that we no longer have to allocate preferences, what happens if noone is able to get 50% of the vote?

    View Comment
  3. Posted August 19, 2016 at 12:33 pm

    Also playing dirty tricks out at mobile polling booths I hear.
    Ignoring 100 metre exclusion zone, bullying, swearing and generally behaving very badly. That goes for the present encumbant and the Greens’ hopeful.
    Why would we ever be surprised with both of their histories? Some of us have been here many decades and whilst aging a little, still have excellent memories of past skulduggeries over that time.

    View Comment
  4. Braedon Earley
    Posted August 16, 2016 at 8:19 pm

    What a lost opportunity. They all played perfectly into Giles’s plan.
    He wasn’t interested in anyone else in his party winning a seat, only his own.
    He knew his opponents better than he thought, well played Giles.
    Might I suggest some of you political savants get together and work out a strategy, which doesn’t include you be played for what it looks like you are.

    View Comment
  5. Vicki McDonald
    Posted August 16, 2016 at 10:32 am

    People have been removing many of Heidi Williams Country Liberals signage south of The Gap and some have even been witnessed taking Heidi Williams core flutes down at Santa Teresa.
    Now that is just not playing fair!

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*