Australian Governments, past and present, seem to have finally arrived …

Comment on The Greens Senator and that four-letter-word: Work. by Bob Beadman.

Australian Governments, past and present, seem to have finally arrived at bipartisanship on the need for mutual obligation: “Do something in return for what your neighbour provides to you.”
How could they not agree in the face of our tragic social statistics.
Now the ACTU wants to stop our work for the dole scheme, and the Greens want to provide more free money.
For years now we have been on a trend of fewer workers, and more dependents. Where will the money come from?

Recent Comments by Bob Beadman

Alcohol floor price may breach Australian Constitution
Because of varying excise and taxation rates for different alcohol products (with the wine lobby spectacularly standing over successive governments), cask wine is taxed at a much lower rate than beer (one report said 5c per standard drink compared to 39c for beer).
Who thinks it is a good idea that beer drinkers subsidise cask wine drinkers?
The Northern Territory Government’s floor price (recommended by an expert committee after extensive public consultation) tries to rectify that absurdity. The Australian Government abdicated its responsibility by ignoring the same recommendation by the Henry Review into Australia’s Future Tax System.
Any increase in the price of products beyond that scope is clearly gouging by the retailers.
Every measure to minimise the destruction alcohol is causing in the Northern Territory should be welcomed by all.


Beer and the tax man’s triple tipple
Given the ravages alcohol wreaks on society and the economy, I have never been able to understand why the government has arranged for beer drinkers to subsidise wine drinkers.
Nor have I been able to understand why alcohol advertising is still permitted, when tobacco advertising was banned many years ago.
I don’t know of a single case where someone has bashed another to death as a consequence of smoking a packet of cigarettes.


‘Resetting the button’ of Aboriginal men’s identity
Thank you. Stories like this rekindle hope.


Fracking forum with surprising rules
You should have stayed on Erwin, as trying as that might have been.
Justice Pepper is reported as having rejected the claims that Origin had misled the Inquiry, and expressed the panel’s concern that Lock The Gate had not fully withdrawn and apologised for its evidence in Darwin.
That would have balanced your reporting.


CDP work for the dole scheme gets a hammering
I enter this minefield reluctantly, and only to bring people back to earth.
Surely the key features of such a scheme should be to:
• Create a system of MUTUAL OBLIGATION, a requirement that ‘you do something (pt work) in return for what your neighbour provides to you’ (welfare payments).
• Address the horrendous social consequences of idleness.
Instead the scheme seems to have become PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 101.
Overpromoted and overregulated to the extent that everyone can find something to fault. It was never an employment agency, or a work incubator, or getting people work ready. That spin may have a place in the cities, but never in the bush where there is a very limited employment market.
A short history. Training Allowances were replaced with Unemployment Benefits in the mid 1970s.
Aborigines couldn’t believe that the Government preferred to pay them to sit down rather than to work.
Communities deteriorated, and pleaded that Unemployment Benefits be aggregated. CDEP was born.
A percentage was added for materials, and another for administration, and the number of particpants inflated.
Government capped numbers, introduced a Remote Area Exemption (from the work test), mixed CDEP and UB (with the obvious resentments arising), fiddled further, abandoned CDEP, and then introduced RJCP (described by some as the greatest public policy train wreck ever), then CDP.
In considering improvements to CDP, everyone must be mindful that CDEP had become a destination, rather than a step up. And it had become a suppressant on the creation of real jobs – councils, schools and health clinics (and others) could borrow staff at will rather than seek appropriate budgets for their needs.
Looking to the near future, when the country can no longer afford the current welfare net, I think every child needs to see a parent working, to replace the idea that Government will keep them for life too.


Be Sociable, Share!