Fracking survey details will not be released

p2358-pauline-cassBy ERWIN CHLANDA

 

Humpty Doo resident Pauline Cass (pictured) gave the Alice Springs News Online a statement about difficulties with making submissions online about the independent inquiry into fracking.

 

Her account differs substantially from what a spokesman for the Government’s Fracking Taskforce had claimed earlier today.

 

It appears the Government has added a facility for acknowledging receipt of submissions only yesterday, the last-but-one day of the one month period allowed for submissions on this controversial issue, a major issue in the August 12 election.

 

The News is still waiting for advice from the Government whether the deadline for submissions – today – will be extended.

 

When asked to comment Ms Cass emailed: “I rang the NT Government switchboard yesterday as I was concerned I still hadn’t received a confirmation email for my submission to the Fracking Inquiry Terms of Reference which I had submitted a week earlier, nor had the rest of my family.

 

“The switchboard put me through to the Department of the Chief Minister’s IT guy, Andrew. He was unaware of any issues until I rang.

 

“We discovered that the website was ‘not capturing submissions’ due to a ‘technical issue’ as an ‘older version of the form’ hadn’t been sending the submissions through.

 

“He couldn’t answer my questions about the NT Government notifying the public or extending the submission deadline and he put me through to Claire Sprunt.

 

“She told me yesterday that the ‘tech team’ were looking into it and that an ‘automated response was now activated’ to confirm receipt of submissions.

 

“I asked her if they would be notifying the public and extending the submission deadline to enable people to resubmit their comments on the Terms of Reference. She said she would need to ask ‘someone higher up’.

 

“I rang Claire back this morning. She said they will not be notifying the public or extending the deadline as there is no need.

 

“I explained (again) that as all five submissions from my family through the government website over the past week hadn’t been received, there could be potentially hundreds of submissions missing, with the submitters oblivious to the fact that their comments have not been received.

 

“The public have a right to know that their comments haven’t been received and they need to be informed to resubmit  – by 5pm today.

 

“We can’t have a fair, open and transparent inquiry if potentially hundreds of Territorians’ comments on the Fracking Inquiry Terms of Reference have been lost and dismissed as unimportant.”

 

 

UPDATE 4:45pm

 

Statement from a spokeswoman of Resources Minister Ken Vowles:

 

“There have not been any IT troubles preventing submissions from being entered.

 

“Submissions close tonight (Thursday, October 13) at midnight.”

 

UPDATE October 16:

 

p2201-Lauren-MossA media release entitled “huge response to open and transparent fracking consultation” was issued on behalf of Lauren Moss (pictured), Minister for Environment and Natural Resources, on October 14.

 

It makes no reference to the issues raised by Pauline Cass and Charmaine Roth in this report.

 

It says, in part: “The NT Government has received 364 submissions for the Draft Terms of Reference for the inquiry into hydraulic fracturing of onshore unconventional gas reservoirs. Public submissions closed yesterday after being open for a four week period.”

 

UPDATE October 20
No information about the survey will be released, according to a spokesman for Environment Minister Lauren Moss.
This includes the full text, the text minus the name or whether the person making the submission is for or against fracking.
The spokesman says a survey before the submission period, which ended on October 13, had revealed a consensus of submitters that they did not wish their comments to be made public in any form.
Be Sociable, Share!

4 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Ian Rennie
    Posted October 25, 2016 at 7:49 pm

    What we have here is a corrupt government with their back pockets wide open riding rough shod over the wishes of the electorate.

    View Comment
  2. Hal Duell
    Posted October 24, 2016 at 11:55 pm

    And once again, immediately after an election many voters experience an emotional outrage similar to that experienced by a person who has purchased a new gadget which quickly proves to work nothing like the advertising promises said it would.
    Nice one, Gunner and Co. How quickly your feet have turned to clay.

    View Comment
  3. Charmaine Roth
    Posted October 14, 2016 at 7:11 am

    I also rang the IT technician in Darwin after I became aware there might be a problem with submitting responses to the fracking inquiry.
    I had not received an acknowledgment after hitting submit.
    The IT tec confirmed my submission had not made it through.
    I mentioned two other names, and he could not locate those either and seemed quite concerned. He suggested that people could email submissions in, but the address was not in the submission page that had been announced to use in a Labor media release.
    He rang back a little while later and said they had hopefully fixed the problem and had also had added the email address in for people.
    I posted on Facebook about the issue to urge people to resubmit if they didn’t receive an acknowledgement.
    I have had about ten people approach me and say that they had the same problem.
    Potentially there could be hundreds of people whose submissions failed to be captured by the NTG website.
    I believe it is only fair that NTG advertise the fact and give an extension for submissions to be made.

    View Comment
  4. R Henry
    Posted October 13, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    rule 1 : the government is always right.
    rule 2 : public servants are always right.
    rule 3 : in the event the government or public service is wrong then see rules 1 and 2.
    rule 4 : if rules 1, 2 and 3 clash with reality then it is the public’s fault.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*