Dear John, (nothing to do with leaving you for somebody …

Comment on Extreme variability: local climate change right now by Evelyne Roullet.

Dear John, (nothing to do with leaving you for somebody else).
Are you on the list of men like Dennis Waterman having “problem with strong, intelligent women”? I sincerely hope not.
Yes, I have a master in the philosophy of laughter following in the foot steps of Democritus, known in antiquity as the “laughing philosopher”.
Hence I have stop taking myself seriously. I am, now, amused by the illusory nature of the self, and can regard myself as a big joke and human existence as absurd.

Evelyne Roullet Also Commented

Extreme variability: local climate change right now
@ John Bell: The following is out of context, but after re-reading some of the comments I realised that one of mine could easily be misinterpreted.
You told me you were on the same list that Denis Waterman. I reacted too fast.
But I had written I hope not because I enjoyed our discussion. So accept my apology.


Extreme variability: local climate change right now
John Bell, it is always with great interest that I listen to the professionals; but I cannot see your name on the list of the great ones.
1824 – French physicist Joseph Fourier describes the Earth’s natural “greenhouse effect”. He writes: “The temperature [of the Earth] can be augmented by the interposition of the atmosphere, because heat in the state of light finds less resistance in penetrating the air, than in re-passing into the air when converted into non-luminous heat.”
1861 – Irish physicist John Tyndall shows that water vapour and certain other gases create the greenhouse effect.
1896 – Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius concludes that industrial-age coal burning will enhance the natural greenhouse effect. He suggests this might be beneficial for future generations. His conclusions on the likely size of the “man-made greenhouse” are in the same ballpark – a few degrees Celsius for a doubling of CO2 – as modern-day climate models.

1927 – Carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and industry reach one billion tonnes per year.
1930 – Human population reaches two billion.
1938 – Using records from 147 weather stations around the world, British engineer Guy Callendar shows that temperatures had risen over the previous century. He also shows that CO2 concentrations had increased over the same period, and suggests this caused the warming. The “Callendar effect” is widely dismissed by meteorologists.
1955 – Using a new generation of equipment including early computers, US researcher Gilbert Plass analyses in detail the infrared absorption of various gases. He concludes that doubling CO2 concentrations would increase temperatures by 3-4C.
1957 – US oceanographer Roger Revelle and chemist Hans Suess show that seawater will not absorb all the additional CO2 entering the atmosphere, as many had assumed. Revelle writes: “Human beings are now carrying out a large scale geophysical experiment…”
1975 – US scientist Wallace Broecker puts the term “global warming” into the public domain in the title of a scientific paper.

1930 – Human population reaches two billion.
1960 – Human population reaches three billion.
1975 – Human population reaches four billion.
1987 – Human population reaches five billion
1999 – Human population reaches six billion.
2011 – Human population reaches seven billion.

1989 – Carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and industry reach six billion tonnes per year.
2006 – Carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and industry reach eight billion tonnes per year.
2011 – Data shows concentrations of greenhouse gases are rising faster than in previous years.

My source is the BBC’s brief history of climate change, here.

Yes John STOP THE WORLD – I WANT TO GET OFF is a thought-provoking tale about the fleeting nature of worldly success. This tale tell us to stop our need for luxury and non necessary goods or, the planet will get read of “our world” and will continue to turn without fleas on her back


Recent Comments by Evelyne Roullet

Warrant for police search of construction firm office
@ Concerned Citizen: Furphy? Does it mean the police is gossiping?


NT cost of living $1700 a week
How many earn $1700 a week?


You can vote No with love: Alice priest
Sue, I have respect for homosexuals who come in the open (I have some in my family and a lot of friends).
But we talking only of equality for heterosexuality and homosexuality. In this case why ignoring bisexuality?
To be a heterosexual man or woman means having a personally significant and meaningful romantic and/or sexual attraction primarily to adults of the opposite sex.
To be a homosexual man or woman means having a personally significant and meaningful romantic and/or sexual attraction primarily to adults of the same sex
To be a bisexual man or woman means having a personally significant and meaningful romantic and/or sexual attraction to both adult males and females, equally attracted to both sexes.
Can we have a legal bounding marriage of three people?


You can vote No with love: Alice priest
To my knowledge, all Australian Federal and State Parliaments and Legislative Assemblies open in prayer – with most using the Lord’s Prayer Ergo Australia is a Christian country.
If the law of marriage is to be changed so the Australian Constitution
Australia’s legal system and institutions, while being secular in nature, also draw heavily on Christian ethics and morality, best illustrated by the 10 commandments and the fact that, for years, it was customary for those involved in trials to swear on the Bible.
The constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom and, in practice, the government generally enforced these protections.
However the major religions of Australia : Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Taoism condemned homosexuality
I think our politicians should first change Constitution and subsequent laws instead of wasting tax payer’s money on a referendum.
We have the Yes and the No who are disturbing our peace. We should may be taking model on the The 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen which is considered by legal authorities to have equal legal standing with the Constitution of France, which states: “No one may be questioned about his opinions, [and the] same [for] religious [opinions], provided that their manifestation does not trouble the public order established by the law.”


You can vote No with love: Alice priest
Bruce: The argument that “every other western country has embraced SSM so jump on board” is similar to the argument teenagers use on their parents. However a good parent will answer: You are not everybody else.


Be Sociable, Share!