Surprised! I do agree with you but to a certain …

Comment on First Nations want a ‘Voice’ enshrined in the constitution by Evelyne Roullet.

Surprised! I do agree with you but to a certain point: total equality does not exist, as we all have different needs; but ALL “to have the same rights” does.
I give one example that really touch me and upset me: My husband has a very good army friend, together they fought for this country in Borneo, in Malaysia and in Vietnam.
This friend with his children and grand children regularly visit us, we have BBQ few drinks and fun. Alas, he cannot reciprocate, because he is an Aborigine who live in a CAMP. Equality? Same rights?
Let’s start by giving the Aborigine a voice then we can have a look to needs and distribution of money.
Money from taxpayers should be distributed accordingly to needs not by ethnicity or past history.

Evelyne Roullet Also Commented

First Nations want a ‘Voice’ enshrined in the constitution
It is time and hopefully quickly.
We are now the only Commonwealth nation that does not have a treaty with its Indigenous peoples. Rather than building our country on the idea of a partnership with Aboriginal people, our laws have sought to exclude and discriminate against them.
The idea of a treaty goes back many years. The failure to enter into a treaty was lamented in the early days of the Australian colonies. For example, the governor of Van Diemen’s Land, George Arthur, presided over a period of great conflict known as the Black War and in 1832 remarked that it was “a fatal error . . . that a treaty was not entered into” with the Aboriginal people of that island.
Positive change in Australia depends on Aboriginal people having more control over their lives. Improvements in education, employment and quality of life must be achieved by policies and programs owned and developed by the people affected.
Success cannot be imposed from Canberra. The hard work must be done by Aboriginal people; but decisions have often been imposed on Aboriginal people by parliaments and governments lacking even a single Indigenous member.
In the words of Prime Minister Keating at Redfern 10/12/1992:
“We have to acknowledge that pre-1788, this land was as Aboriginal then as it is Australian now and until we have acknowledged that, we will be an incomplete nation and a torn people.”….

“Isn’t it reasonable to say that if we can build a prosperous and remarkably harmonious multicultural society in Australia, surely we can find just solutions to the problems which beset the first Australians – the people to whom the most injustice has been done.”


Recent Comments by Evelyne Roullet

Morrison announces cash injection for NT
Blackmail refers to a situation that arises when a person threatens another person with some form of punishment if they do not offer some form of concessions.
The offence of Blackmail is contained in section 249K of the Crimes Act 1900. It reads as follows:
(1) A person who makes any unwarranted demand with menaces:
• With the intention of obtaining a gain or of causing a loss, or
• With the intention of influencing the exercise of a public duty, is guilty of an offence.
In NSW, Blackmail carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.
Even emotional blackmail is illegal.


New energy for anti fracking campaign
As the Greek proverb goes: “A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.”
So the NT will grow great when our leaders forget their pockets and think renewal energy.
May be we will have less revenues and will suffer for a bit in the hands of the Feds, but our children will live on and well.


Central Petroleum west of Alice: No plans for fracking
Senator McCarthy says she wants to be briefed about how the inquiry’s recommendations will be implemented, and about the newly formed body.
Good for her, because that is the QUESTION!
No one can guarantee there will be no accident in any industry.
To err on the side of caution is not good enough in this case.


Fracking OK, but under ‘strict laws’ – Gunner
Domenico Pecorari: Gunner does not care about the next elections. He probably has a good CEO job or consultant reserved for him in the mining / fracking industry like Adam Giles with the pastoral industry.


New energy for anti fracking campaign
@ Ban Fracking: Have you forgotten 2012 NT elections?
I was the Green candidate for Greatorex and was very upset when I was told I had to make a deal with Labor. Nothing I could do, but then I quit the party after the elections. Since then I do not trust any party.
“Political truth is mutable, relative, adaptable. It may even be absent or, worse, irrelevant; a servant to the more certain verities of power and advantage.”


Be Sociable, Share!