13 year old denied bail after rampage

2454 Middle Earth 670

 

EDITOR’S NOTE, 12:50pm June 21:

 

We have now had contact from the Central Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service (CAALAS). Its senior legal officer, Glen Dooley, whom we had unsuccessfully tried to contact on Monday (we were also unable to contact CEO Eileen Van lersel), made available to us a court document dealing with the violent death in January of the mother of the 13-year-old defendant reported about here.

 

His father has been charged with her murder.

 

The document describes a protracted attack, some of which was witnessed by the defendant’s two sisters, in their home.

 

Having a clearer understanding of the trauma to which the 13-year-old and his sisters have been exposed, the Alice Springs News Online has now decided to replace in this report the names of the defendant, and the other children mentioned, with “Child One” or “Child Two” and so on, and remove their addresses. There is no other change to the report.

 

The publication of the identity of juvenile defendants appearing in open court is not prohibited in the Northern Territory, but we usually do not name them.

 

Crime by children, frequent breaches of bail and the repeat offending by some is of ongoing extreme concern in the communities of Central Australia.

 

 

 

By ERWIN CHLANDA

 

The vehemently contrasting approaches to crimes committed by children played out in the Tennant Creek Lower Court on June 6 when Judge Greg Borchers remanded in custody a 13-year-old boy [Child One] who had pleaded guilty to damaging a car and two commercial premises, after breaching bail granted for earlier offences.

 

The Alice Springs News Online has been told that the Central Australian Legal Aid Service will be lodging a complaint against Judge Borchers. CAALAS did not respond to a request for comment today. (UPDATE, 21 June 2017: CAALAS has now made a public statement about the complaint, reported here.)

 

This is an excerpt from the transcript of the court hearing.

 

It began with [Child One] pleading guilty and police prosecutor Mark Lyons giving an account of his offences.

 

Mr Lyons said the victims are Bluestone Motor Inn, ANZ Bank Tennant Creek (pictured below) and Middle Earth Chinese Restaurant (pictured above).

 

He said at 9:30 pm on Tuesday, May 23 “the defendant was at the Bluestone Motor Inn on Paterson Street with co-offenders […] who were observed there by Constable Christopher Gunn, while conducting patrols in the area.

 

“Around 11:30 pm, Bluestone CCTV captured the defendant, [Child Two] and [Child Three] … entering the motel.

 

“A short time later the defendant climbed onto the roof and turned the CCTV cameras whilst [Child Four] and [Child Three] tried door handles of vehicles and rooms to see if they were unlocked.

 

“A short time later the defendant jumped off the roof and landed on the roof of a Toyota Prado … causing damage to the roof of the vehicle.

 

“Around midnight on May 27 the defendant was with [Child Two], [Child Four] and an unknown co-offender at Haddock Street park, consuming alcohol, causing himself to become intoxicated.

 

“At 4:52 am, the defendant, [Child Four, Child Two] and the unknown co-offender attended the ANZ automatic teller machine on Paterson Street to withdraw funds.

 

“A short time later, the defendant and the unknown co-offender kicked the door to the ANZ several times, (inaudible) into the bank.

 

“The offender and the unknown co-offender entered the bank and attempted to steal money from the safe while [two alleged offenders] remained outside in the street.

 

“At 5:04 am, the defendant and his three co-offenders left the bank and walked over to the police CCTV camera trailer on the other side of the road.

 

“The defendant attempted to climb on top of the trailer, however, he was unsuccessful.

 

“A short time later, the defendant and his co-offenders pried open the metal frame to the door of the Middle East [sic] Chinese shop, broke the glass door and entered the shop.

 

“The defendant stole a small golden cat statue with [two co-offenders], while [Child 2] stole a pink beverage from the fridge.

 

“The defendant broke the statue outside the restaurant on concrete. A short time later, the defendant and his co-offenders left the area.

 

“At 12:42 pm the defendant was located by Constable Aaron Chapman at [address] and observed to be wearing the same clothes as in the CCTV footage.

 

“The defendant was cautioned and placed under arrest by Constable Chapman, in the presence of his responsible adult … and was then conveyed to the watchhouse.”

 

Defence council for [Child One], Dev Bhutani, from Aboriginal Legal Aid, told the court “those facts are admitted”.

 

Mr Lyons told the court that the defendant “currently has $3810 of outstanding fines”.

 

MR BHUTANI: Your Honour, [Child One] comes before the court as still a very young offender for all purposes. He’s 13 years of age before the court and it is conceded he comes to court with like offences on his record, your Honour.

 

He also comes before the court, your Honour, with an extremely difficult set of circumstances that I will address through the course of this plea, but with undoubtedly, challenges, your Honour, that are very difficult for anyone of any age, but particularly for a young man from a background such as [Child One’s] at his young age of 13.

 

He is engaged with a range of support services here in Tennant Creek, given the people here in the courtroom and the hope is that Tennant Creek will continue to remain the best place for [Child One] as he does have, not only family support here, but also those support services earlier mentioned, your Honour.

 

Your Honour, in terms of the offending, it is really hard to characterise it in any other way than, not only juvenile, but rather brazen, your Honour, as aside from being multiple premises in front of CCTV cameras. There’s no other way to really put it any higher than quite a brazen and open assault upon a various number of premises here in Tennant Creek …

 

HIS HONOUR: What about the words, “extremely serious”?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour. It is conceded it is very serious offending, particularly …

 

HIS HONOUR: Objectively extremely serious.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, your Honour, I would naturally put that I think there are other offences that would take – would be all too serious, but objectively, yes, it is a serious offence. There are multiple premises over a short amount of time. They are often broken into, but what I urge your Honour to take into account is that thankfully, none of the premises had people in them at the time.

 

Thankfully, the overall loss wasn’t all that great …

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, how do you know? Have we got quotes yet?

 

MR LYONS: No, your Honour, but I would – I haven’t got any quotes back from the ANZ Bank as yet.

 

HIS HONOUR: So, we’ve got a roof of a Toyota Prado. We’ve got the door of the ANZ Bank, which I noticed, because I went to the ANZ Bank, it’s wooden now, so it needs a new door. The door of the Chinese restaurant and a statue, which presumably is now an expense.

 

MR LYONS: The last time that Middle Earth got their doors broken it was over $3000.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. Yes. Client coming up with the money, is he, Mr Bhutani?

 

MR BHUTANI: No, your Honour, as you’ve heard he already has a considerable amount of outstanding …

 

HIS HONOUR: Family going to pay the money, are they, Mr Bhutani?

 

MR BHUTANI: Not that I know of.

 

HIS HONOUR: Who is going to pay the money, Mr Bhutani?

 

MR BHUTANI: Your Honour, it’s a difficult situation. Unfortunately …

 

HIS HONOUR: No. No. Tell me, who do you think might pay the money, Mr Bhutani?

 

MR BHUTANI: It will unfortunately fall upon the ratepayers – the insurance payers here, the residents in Tennant Creek.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. Exactly.

 

MR BHUTANI: And, that’s understood, your Honour, and it isn’t shied away from that the damage will be considerable …

 

HIS HONOUR: So, do you think the restaurant – who’s going to pay for the restaurant? I mean the bank’s a big business, we know they make a fortune, that’s alright. We know the Northern Territory Government just borrows money from taxpayers from the rest of Australia to pay for its liabilities.

 

But, who’s going to pay for the restaurant? Would you think the owners of the restaurant can afford it, Mr Bhutani?

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, it is unfortunate, your Honour, that the insurance rates are going up because of reoccurring offending like this. It is …

 

HIS HONOUR: What’s the main shop in the main street of Tennant Creek?

 

MR BHUTANI: I’m not sure, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, it’s an empty shop, isn’t it. And, why would it be an empty shop, do you think?

 

MR BHUTANI: Because, the insurance rates are difficult to pay because of this type of offending, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. That’s exactly right. So, where are we now? We are at a prevalent serious offending.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes.

 

2454 ANZ Tennant 450MR BHUTANI: The prevalence of the offence, your Honour, shouldn’t outweigh the general seriousness of the offending. It shouldn’t mean that [Child One] is made an example of, just because it is an overly prevalent offence.

 

HIS HONOUR: No, but you said that how many – Mr Bhutani, how many businesses has your client broken into already?

 

MR BHUTANI: He does come with priors, it’s conceded.

 

HIS HONOUR: No. Count them up, tell me. Put it on the record, tell me how many businesses your client has broken into?

 

MR BHUTANI: I’d have to review his record, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Please do so. You may do also, sergeant. We can have an agreement on this on how many premises this young person has broken into.

 

MR BHUTANI: It’s my reading of the information for courts, your Honour, it would be five.

 

MR LYONS: That’s correct, your Honour, five buildings and then there’s three enter dwelling houses.

 

HIS HONOUR: Thank you.

 

MR BHUTANI: With many of those, your Honour – well with all of them proceeding without conviction, your Honour, and going through the Youth Justice Court.

 

HIS HONOUR: I’m not asking you that. I’m asking you how many times has he broken into buildings?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes.

 

HIS HONOUR: I’m not asking you how he was dealt with. I’m asking you how many times he’s been breaking into buildings.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour, I didn’t …

 

HIS HONOUR: Now I will ask you, when was the last time he was dealt with for breaking into buildings?

 

MR BHUTANI: 19 March, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: March?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: And, these offences took place in May?

 

MR BHUTANI: Correct.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. Okay. Thank you. And, just a couple of other preliminary matters, 23 May was a school day, is that right?

 

MR LYONS: It was, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: It was a school day.

 

MR LYONS: A Tuesday.

 

HIS HONOUR: Was he at school that day?

 

MR BHUTANI: I do have his school attendance records here. I don’t know if it has the specificity of individual days. Yes. It appears he was, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: On Wednesday?

 

MR BHUTANI: It actually appears he wasn’t the night – yes, he was, as per my reading of this, it does appear that he was there the next day.

 

HIS HONOUR: And, who was looking after him on the nights the 23rd and 27 May? You say he’s got lots of family support, who was actually exercising parental control over him on those two nights?

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, he has been moving around slightly, your Honour, so I would have to take those instructions …

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, please. Please.

 

MR BHUTANI: He would have been living at [address] with …

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. Who was exercising parental control?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes. Yes, your Honour, with [Adult].

 

HIS HONOUR: Right. Who’s she?

 

MR BHUTANI: She’s the grandmother. She’s outside the courtroom, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, get her in.

 

MR BHUTANI: Certainly, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: I want to know why she didn’t report him missing to the police. Right. Mr Bhutani, I want you to get some instructions from [the grandmother] and ask her where she thought [Child One] was at 5 am on 27 May.

 

MR BHUTANI: I will do that, your Honour. I just seek to correct the record, I re-read the attendance report. On my reading it appears that there was unexplained absences on Monday 22nd, the 23rd and the 24th of May surrounding the time of this offending. If I might be excused?

 

[At Child One’s address] there are some seven children residing including co-offenders, namely [Child Two]. On that specific evening, or on evenings around that date, another grandson of [the grandmother] was sick at a separate address that she went to care for, making sure that – well, where she went to care for and therefore, didn’t notice the absence of [Child One] and presumably …

 

HIS HONOUR: Okay. Well, who was looking after them?

 

MR BHUTANI: I don’t have those instructions. She was taking care of another grandchild at that point.

 

HIS HONOUR: Fine. Who was looking after these young people? He’s a 13-year old. He’s supposed to be at school the next day. So, who was looking after him? Who tucked him into bed, give him the nightly meal, was going to get up, give him his breakfast and get him off to school? Who was doing that? It’s called parental responsibility.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour, and if I might actually address on that …

 

HIS HONOUR: No. No. I want to know who was looking after this young person on the evening of 27 May?

 

MR BHUTANI: And, this has to do with that point, your Honour, that there’s been significant difficulties, or significant …

 

HIS HONOUR: So, is the answer no one?

 

MR BHUTANI: I just don’t know.

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, please ask. I want to know.

 

MR BHUTANI: I interpret that the responsible adult who was initially notified as [Adult], your Honour, would have been at the premises providing supervision and …

 

HIS HONOUR: Who was that person?

 

MR BHUTANI: That is co-offender, [Child Two’s] mother.

 

HIS HONOUR: So, you can go back to this point that you’ve made that he’s got significant family support. So, we got to the point where he doesn’t go to school, unexplained absences on 22nd, 23rd and 24th of May and he’s rampaging around the community in the early hours of the morning on the 22nd, because no one’s looking after him.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, if I might address your Honour on that point?

 

HIS HONOUR: But, they’re the facts, aren’t they?

 

MR BHUTANI: Absolutely. But, if I can contextualise it, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: No. No. Let’s just agree on some facts.

 

MR BHUTANI: And, those are agreed, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: They’re agreed facts.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes.

 

HIS HONOUR: And, what does my order say in March, that he signed and he said he’d agreed to? What did it say? He would go to school every day.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Right.

 

MR BHUTANI: If I might contextualise, the last few months in [Child One’s] life, your Honour, now your Honour’s probably aware of a death that took place in the Tennant Creek community that’s now really being investigated as a murder.

 

That is [Child One’s] mother and the primary suspect at this stage is his father, who is currently serving a significant time on remand at the Alice Springs Correctional Centre, being investigated for the death of his partner and [Child One’s] mother.

 

Now that, your Honour, by all accounts, by all service providers here in the courtroom today, which I’m happy to call as well, has obviously taken a very significant toll on [Child One]. But, I think it’s really well reflected …

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, call them. I’d like to know how they relate that to breaking into people’s property including that. Call one of them, anyone you like and get that person to tell me how grief results in breaking into banks.

 

MR BHUTANI: Very much so. If I might …

 

HIS HONOUR: Please.

 

MR BHUTANI: If I might first, your Honour, tender – and I might finish my point, tendering the school attendance records from a period prior to April and a period later on. Sorry, a period from April and a period to April.

 

It really shows a very remarkable noticeable difference in attendance, 79 percent down to 26 percent. And, this is at a time after he’s just lost his mother.

 

But, by all accounts, your Honour, that ongoing alcohol misuse and other issues in the family have really resulted in [Child One] being of quite low mood, suffering social anxiety. I’ve also got notes that he struggles to make and maintain long term friendships and really does take solace in the company of his two younger sisters, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Sorry. Say that again.

 

MR BHUTANI: That he really takes solace in the company of his two younger sisters.

 

HIS HONOUR: How old are they?

 

MR BHUTANI: Seven and eight?

 

HIS HONOUR: So, why wasn’t he with them at night?

 

MR BHUTANI: Sorry, 12 and 13 …

 

HIS HONOUR: Okay. So, if he’s so concerned about them, why is he out on the streets at 5 am?

 

MR BHUTANI: They were residing in Ali Curung at that time, your Honour. And, really …

 

MR LYONS: It’s by consent, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Thank you. Yes. Go on.

 

MR BHUTANI: Now, Mr Bligh (?) and Ms Shaw, who’s providing assistance and support to [Child One] is that she notes he has a depressed mood, feelings of hopelessness, purposelessness. It fluctuates depending on the situation and that he is particularly, because of these situations, vulnerable to peer pressure and negative influences.

 

He is also still of a very young age, your Honour, and some of the co-offenders that he was with are of older ages. But, the ongoing plan, your Honour, is to have him …

 

HIS HONOUR: Sorry. The oldest is 18, is that right?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes. One of them is being dealt with in the adult jurisdiction.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. He’s 18, just turned 18. The others are all his age.

 

MR BHUTANI: As per my material …

 

HIS HONOUR: [Child Two], how old is [Child Two]?

 

MR LYONS: I think he’s about 17, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: He’s a youth.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes. He’s still being dealt with in the Youth Justice Court, your Honour, and he’s 15 years of age.

 

HIS HONOUR: Your client, you keep on saying 13. But, what’s your client going to be tomorrow?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour. He’s unfortunately, going to be turning 14 and while some of the co-offenders were 15 and 18 years of age, naturally, where he’s lacking the support, having gone through a very traumatic incident, he’s obviously turning for support in other places and looking for guidance and acceptance by some of his people who attend his school and otherwise, that he is residing with.

 

Now, your Honour, the ongoing or future plan for [Child One] is that there is further psychiatric assessment with a clinical psychologist, or child youth psychiatrist which is due to visit Tennant Creek on 19 June 2017. And, that he continues individual therapy here in Tennant Creek through the Youth Mental Health Team.

 

In terms of other aspects …

 

HIS HONOUR: When did he start with the Youth Mental Health Team?

 

MR BHUTANI: Your Honour, I’m of the understanding that there’s been limited, or difficulty in engaging him, but there was one one-on-one session that took place on 20 April.

 

HIS HONOUR: So, he’s had one session?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Right. One session. 20th of April.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: He’s had no sessions since then?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour, I don’t think that’s obviously …

 

HIS HONOUR: Because he’s – no sessions since then?

 

MR BHUTANI: Not that I’m aware of, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: No. Right. So, he’s had one session?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes.

 

MR BHUTANI: And, obviously, all his future plans are dependent on [Child One’s] engagement with them.

 

HIS HONOUR: And, why has there been no session since 20 April?

 

MR BHUTANI: I only understand because of the difficulty in engaging with him.

 

HIS HONOUR: Difficulty engaging him. Yes.

 

MR BHUTANI: And, in the context of the imprisonment of his father and the …

 

HIS HONOUR: Where is clinical psychiatrist coming from?

 

MR BHUTANI: I’d have to get those instructions. Alice Springs, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Who is the clinical psychiatrist?

 

A PERSON UNKNOWN: Dr Megan Chambers, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Thank you.

 

MR BHUTANI: In terms of other points of concern that previously existed with [Child One], your Honour, there’s been no further reports of volatile substance abuse. It was a concern. And, while he does still have an open case, my understanding with the VSA team, there is an ongoing, sort of, intervention or assistance in terms of that guard.

 

At this stage, the focus for [Child One], or the way to make him best move forward is really to help him address and assist him through the grief and trauma that he is currently going through before trying to focus on more concrete future plans in terms of further training and education.

 

I know that’s difficult, your Honour, given such a young age. But, as your Honour can see with his current attendance rate of 26 percent, it is – he’s obviously having trouble engaging with the providers and the education system and that’s what’s resulting or yielding in this behaviour.

 

Now, unless I am able to assist specifically any further, your Honour, there was some specific difficulties taking instructions from [Child One] in the watchhouse.

 

There are no free cells in the watchhouse. He is currently sharing a cell with [Child Two]. Obviously, your Honour can imagine trying to take instructions from a youth when he is sitting next to his co-offender is somewhat difficult, but particularly that a youth of …

 

HIS HONOUR: Your services had – he was in Alice Springs was he not?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. And, you had solicitors see him in Alice Springs. Is that right?

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes, your Honour.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes.

 

MR BHUTANI: A solicitor saw him on 29 May, while he appeared in custody.

 

HIS HONOUR: Yes. So, you’ve had a lot of opportunities to speak to him.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, yes, your Honour. I got to speak to him today to try and get some further personal instructions as to where he wants to be residing …

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, tell me where he wants to reside.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, he wants to continue residing here in Tennant Creek.

 

HIS HONOUR: And, what’s he going to do?

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, continue attending school here.

 

HIS HONOUR: But, he doesn’t attend school.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, he does to a limited to degree.

 

HIS HONOUR: Well, let’s read some of these, okay. Let’s read some of these: ‘2nd May. Came to school late, [Child One] and [another child] were not in class; too busy jumping on walls around the school. Got them in the class eventually at 12:20 pm. Then they ran away.’

 

The next day, ‘Arrived late. Didn’t attend class. Left the grounds before the end of the school.’ 4 May, ‘[A child] rings up and says they’re going to Ali Curung.’ 5 May, ‘Gone to Ali Curung.’ 8 May, ‘Too tired to come to school.’ 9 May, ‘Came late, left school grounds before HG,’ not sure what that is, ‘and didn’t return.’

 

Not there 10 May, not there 11 May, not there 12 May. Came on 15 May, but didn’t go to lessons, went home. 16 May, didn’t attend any lessons. 17, 18, 19 of May, didn’t turn up; no explanations. 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 25th, 26th didn’t turn up, no explanations.

 

MR BHUTANI: I’d say, your Honour, that’s almost an unfair characterisation in that your Honour’s looking …

 

HIS HONOUR: I’m reading the – I’m reading the report …

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes. If I might finish …

 

HIS HONOUR: … the individual absentee report. So, it would appear from 4 April, your client’s hardly been to school.

 

MR BHUTANI: Yes. Yes, your Honour. After his mother was killed. But, if you compare that …

 

HIS HONOUR: But, you just told me he wants now to go and live at home, where he is not supervised and he doesn’t go to school, but that’s where he wants to go.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, your Honour, there isn’t a magical wand …

 

HIS HONOUR: So, why is it now that suddenly, he wants to go home and go to school, which he couldn’t do before?

 

MR BHUTANI: Your Honour, I’m not saying that [Child One] will walk out of the courtroom and be attending Tennant Creek High School a hundred percent of the time.

 

HIS HONOUR: But, he will. I’ve ordered him.

 

MR BHUTANI: And, as much as a court order might …

 

HIS HONOUR: No one is looking after him to send him there.

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, there are obviously difficulties, your Honour, with his home and care situation and it is not that any order your Honour might think to impose isn’t going to change his situation.

 

HIS HONOUR: So, what should I do, Mr Bhutani?

 

MR BHUTANI: Well, we are in a difficult …

 

HIS HONOUR: So, do you want me to go back to the good behaviour bond and say, change it, so he only has to go to school when he wants to?

 

MR BHUTANI: No, your Honour. Well, it would have been ideal, your Honour, in circumstances like this, I think, for a community work order …

 

HIS HONOUR: Rubbish. That wasn’t put to me and you know precisely why it wasn’t. Because, you and your colleagues have a mantra. And, the mantra is, he’s in the Youth Court. He’s too young to do that, he’s got to get a good behaviour bond and that’s what he got.

 

MR BHUTANI: Sorry. I’m suggesting that on this one. I’m suggesting that on this file.

 

HIS HONOUR: He’s not getting a good behaviour bond, Mr Bhutani. I’m thinking of gaol, so you go prepare yourself by getting a pre-sentence report.

 

This was followed by further submissions by the defence counsel and the prosecutor, in part about prospects of rehabilitation and community work orders rather than incarceration, after which Judge Borchers asked [Child One] to stand up and he said to him:

 

“You came before my court in March of this year, at which time you were about to be dealt with for a number of offences. Those offences had mainly been committed in Tennant Creek.

 

“Included in those offences were the fact that you went to Dion Beasley’s house. You know who Dion Beasley is, because everyone else does in Tennant Creek. And, you deliberately damaged the car, which is used to transport him and his wheelchair, with absolute no regard to the difficult situation that Dion Beasley finds himself in. No regard for the distress that you caused his carers.

 

“You were given an opportunity. Given an opportunity which you signed and you agreed in court. You were legally represented. You had lawyers constantly representing you for a long period of time and you stood in court, and presumably they spoke to you and impressed upon you the importance of staying out of trouble.

 

“They would have said to you that the court’s concerned about the fact that you’re a young person and that you need to demonstrate that you can stay out of trouble. I accept that there have been difficulties in your family, but Mr Bhutani said two things to me at the beginning of his submission. One is that you have family support.

 

“There are people in court here, but there is no one exercising parental control over you. You’re rampaging around the streets at night and no one cares. I haven’t heard from the police that anyone rang the police, or contacted the police to say that you were missing after midnight, because no one cares.

 

“The second thing that he said is that you have significant engagement with community groups. You’ve had one session in April and the reason why you haven’t had more is because it’s been too difficult to engage you.

 

“That is, that you haven’t wanted it. I’ve heard that you initially, were committed to school. I’ve read the report. I’ve read it out to Mr Bhutani.

 

“He says that I’m being unfair and I should contextualise the report and I will. I will contextualise the report in this sense: you’ve got no one looking after you. That’s why you don’t go to school. It might be somewhat stereotyping in a socioeconomic way. But, there’s no one providing you with an evening meal, tucking you into bed, getting you up in the morning, giving you breakfast and sending you off to school. And, if there is, you’re not listening to them.

 

“So, I’ve been told that ultimately, on the 27th it was [Child Two’s] mother who was looking after you after your grandmother had gone to look after someone else at some house. She’d left you with some other grandmother, who then moved you onto [another person’s] mother, but no one knew where you were. You were out on the streets.

 

“Yes. You might have been the youngest of the gang, but less than three months before, you stood before a court and you made a promise that you’d stay out of trouble. so, I’m not sure how you now, in your own head, rationalise the fact that you stood here and you said, ‘I won’t get into trouble,’ and less than three months later, you’re breaking into the Bluestone.

 

“You’re deliberately moving the CCTV camera so that you won’t get caught. Which is clear evidence that you knew what you were doing was wrong.

 

“Then you jumped down on the roof of a Prado. The fact that you feel sorry about what’s happened in your family, how does that justify you damaging other people’s property? I’m told that you’re really concerned about your sisters. How does damaging other people’s property and possibly going into gaol help your sisters? It doesn’t.

 

“So, you go down to the Bluestone and you damage that. And, a couple of nights later, you’re out and about again. This time you kick the door in on the ANZ Bank and go inside and make a good effort to see what you can steal. You know what you’re going to steal. What does a bank have? It has money. What else could it possibly be that you were in there looking for?

 

“How does that sit with feeling grief for your family? And, then you go over the road to the restaurant and damage that door, go in and break some property. These are serious offences. They’re prevalent in this community, they’re a curse on this community and they’re prevalent for you. You’ve been doing them for some time.

 

“But, there’s a break between what you did in the past and the present, and that break was when you were in custody, came before the court for a while and then made a promise; stood up, ‘Yes. I’ll stay out of trouble. I’ll go to school.’

 

“Now, I accept, as I have said, that there’s been a bit of a breakdown in your family; a significant breakdown. But, you’ve dutchessed it. That means that you’ve taken advantage of it. You’re out and about on the streets with your mates, because no one really is in a position to look after you.

 

“What I’m asked to do today is to send you back into exactly the same situation that you were in on 27 May, into a house where someone might or might not look after you. Because, clearly while you say you’ve got family support and there’s people here, no one is actually sticking their hand up and saying, ‘I will parent this child.’

 

“Meaning, ‘I will make sure this child has meals, goes to bed, and gets to school.’ There’s no one. I’m also told that if you went back into the situation you’d be involved in community organisations. Well, you don’t go to school and when you do go to school, you’re rampaging around the schoolyard, you don’t go into lessons and you haven’t engaged with the Barkly Mental Health Unit. That’s clear. One session and they haven’t been able to do anything else with you, because you haven’t turned up.

 

“You’re not going back into the community. The community can’t afford you. It’s quite clear that you and your family are not going to pick up the damages for what you’ve caused. And, presumably, and I infer this, you’ve got no understanding of that. You don’t know what a first world economy is. You don’t know the difference between – you don’t know where money comes from other than the government gives it out.

 

“People work. People make money. If they don’t make money, they starve, or they lose their businesses. And, there’s a very good chance that there will be businesses in this town that won’t continue after a number of years because of the number of times that they’ve been broken into. Because, you’re not paying for it, your family’s not paying for it. You don’t even pay your fines.

 

“I’m remanding you in custody, in detention. You’ll get the opportunity for the psychiatrist to see you and to provide me with a report. Well, provide your solicitors with a report and they can present it to court. But, the next time you come to court before me, I want a plan that doesn’t say, ‘Just send me home.’ Because, that’s not going to happen. No one’s looking after you.

 

“I want a plan that actually says, ‘I’ll go to school.’ Because, you made that promise and you don’t do it. So, there has to be some other plan to get you to school. Not what might happen; but a real one. And also, a plan about what other activities that you’ll do outside of school.

 

“So, I’m ordering a pre-sentence report and you will appear at 9:30 am, 13 July. That in Alice Springs. Thank you.”

 

PHOTOS courtesy Tennant and District Times.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

26 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Surprised!
    Posted June 26, 2017 at 9:55 pm

    Pamela. Parenting starts from the day they are born. His father probably wasn’t in remand then and his mother was alive then.
    So are you saying he was cared for and a model citizen before his mothers tragic death and his fathers remand?
    Hence my “parents responsibility” comment meaning to carry the responsibility for many years.
    So, he got caught, punished and now it’s traumatic. All caused by his own actions on multiple occasions.
    You conveniently neglect to offer an opinion on his victims.
    Do you think they are not traumatised in someway? What did they do to deserve this? Do they have the money for repairs? Who will ask them and who cares? Well someone should care.
    Unfortunately we live in a real world not a fairyland where anyone can do what they want and get away with it.
    His crimes were his choices and he failed one of the tests of life.

    View Comment
  2. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted June 26, 2017 at 4:33 pm

    Could all those against the judgement put forward a better solution or program.

    View Comment
  3. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted June 26, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    Pamela, you said “Child 1 needs care and containment and concern. It is an indictment and massive failure of systems that Child 1 can only be incarcerated”.
    No. He has been put in PROTECTIVE CUSTODY.

    View Comment
  4. Posted June 26, 2017 at 9:08 am

    ‘Surprised!’ – The child’s father is being held on remand, awaiting trial for the alleged murder of the child’s mother. He has no parents caring for him. The treatment of this traumatised child by the “justice” system is tragic.

    View Comment
  5. Surprised!
    Posted June 24, 2017 at 1:06 am

    Pamela, it’s pretty simple. It’s the child of the parents, so the child is the parents’ responsibility, end of story.
    I argue very much against your suggestion “we are all responsible”.
    If the parents had taken their responsibility, this would not have become society’s problem.
    By allowing it to become society’s problem is actually removing empowerment from the parents.
    Society has rules, good and bad. We make a choice to abide by them or not.
    Break the rules by choice and accept the consequences.
    Plenty of people have had trauma as children, much worse than this lad. They have grown up to be fine people.
    How can you hold your hand to your heart and even contemplate blaming society?

    View Comment
  6. Pamela
    Posted June 23, 2017 at 2:43 pm

    The lived life of Child 1 is most distressing.
    The Judge’s raging condemnation is most distressing.
    How can one repeat to a traumatised child “none cares about you?”
    His mother is dead and his father is charged with the murder.
    How can one accuse failure of parental responsibility?
    Child 1 went on a rampage.
    His life has been rampaged, ruptured, shattered and broken.
    Child 1 needs care and containment and concern. It is an indictment and massive failure of systems that Child 1 can only be incarcerated.
    The lawyer was unable to put his case.
    We are all responsible for the trauma and plight of this Child 1.

    View Comment
  7. Connie
    Posted June 23, 2017 at 10:11 am

    Good for the judge who is showing commonsense and responsibility for the welfare of this young person.
    It appears family and agencies can’t or won’t do much, so the judge is trying to do the right thing by the boy and society.
    We need more like the judge and agencies who are staffed and rescouced to take care of these young offenders.

    View Comment
  8. John Bell
    Posted June 21, 2017 at 11:51 am

    @ Ms de Vere: I very much agree with you that the issue of education for young people and youth crime in remote Aboriginal communities is a most important social concern.
    At the moment, no one seems to have an effective or definitive solution that fits all. Individual cases such as this young 13-year-old lad before the court is distressingly far too frequent.
    Reading the Ccourt transcript of this case as reported by Alice Springs News Online, while admittedly not knowing the lad personally, nevertheless I felt that Magistrate Borchers has made the best decision, in everyone’s best interests, including the welfare of the lad.
    Seminars and 1990s plans all have their proper place in addressing this social problem holistically in the community.
    But in the urgent reality of this particular individual incident here and now, Magistrate Borchers’ decision provides the best opportunity (in my limited opinion) for a good balance of justice, fairness and compassion in this particular case while the wider solution is being argued, discussed and generally kicked around at great length in the community.

    View Comment
  9. John Bell
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 8:58 pm

    @ Mr Henry: Somehow I would worry about Scrubby in today’s PC 18C environment.
    Eminently sensible decisions with an innate understanding of local rascals, cops and lawyers in the Alice. Bluntly delivered on the nose, no fancy gobbledigook Sir Humphrey-speak, Scrubby’s down-to-earth comments would not survive five minutes in this hypersensitive Section 18C society of human rights.
    The HRC crowd would have him hanging by the thumbs in their Pitt Street Dungeon … in the overcrowded Misogynist Male Division.
    But heck, Scrubby was on the mark … and hugely entertaining! An NT character!

    View Comment
  10. Posted June 20, 2017 at 8:49 pm

    At last a caring Judge, making a very sensible determination.
    As a Ex Tennant Creek resident having seen first hand the growing problem, I’m thrilled of this discision.
    Unfortunately on my last visit it broke my heart to see the state of the town.

    View Comment
  11. Diane de Vere
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 7:03 pm

    @ John Bell: John, I respect the fact that you choose to use your real name [I hope it is not a pseudonym ], I think we all need to be open about our identity if we choose to contribute to the dialogue about such important matters. I note several people have responded in this way, many have not.
    And so I will respond to your two questions albeit in a limited way in this forum.
    Questiion One: “Are you siding with the lad’s CALAAS lawyer or with Judge Borchers?” My Response: Neither. I appreciated reading the whole transcript and I selected one point to respond to – a point that is within my area of knowledge and expertise.
    I believe it is relevant to put this article into the context of the current Royal Commission into youth detention and child protection in the NT. I feel for the stress incurred by the judge and the lawyer and the “lad” for that matter all of us who care.
    Question Two: What is your solution? I could ask you the same. The solution is simple: Education.
    Let’s have some truth and reparation. Healing teaching and learning share our stories value each other. Listen to each other. Dadirri.
    Thank you John for asking me these questions.

    View Comment
  12. R Henry
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 4:53 pm

    One of the best judgments I have heard / read since the days of Alice Springs magistrate “Scrubby” Hall. Pity a few more Judges couldn’t come round to this realistic way of thinking.

    View Comment
  13. John Bell
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 3:34 pm

    @ Ms de Vere: I raised my eyebrows a little bit when I read your quote:”Who was protecting them from predatory guards and psycholigical damage and brutalisation by a bullying dysfunctional system, who held the duty of care?”
    I suspect you are a devotee of the ABC position of victimhood generally which is your right.
    However, I suspect that there is an overwhelming majority of caring ordinary punter Don Dale staff who would be deeply offended by your categorisation of predator in a very difficult system in which they worked diligently with a duty of care and as conscientiously as you and I would in such circumstances.
    This lad in front of magistrate Borchers is a danger to himself as much as he is to others.
    The human resources needed to get the lad on the straight and narrow before he reaches adulthood have been stretched to the limit.
    There comes a point where duty of care towards the community, his past victims and his very likely future victims becomes paramount.
    I would ask you two questions: (1) are you siding with the lad’s CALAAS lawyer or with judge Borchers? (2) What is your solution?

    View Comment
  14. Brett
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 2:51 pm

    As the victim of a recent violent home invasion, it is such a relief to see a judge take [decisions] seriously.
    In my case the 15 year old offender was released before I was released from hospital.
    I wonder if the crimes happened to the judge or his family.

    View Comment
  15. Careful with that tort, Eugene
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 2:48 pm

    Original Centralian, Posted June 20, 2017 at 10:12 am: If you’ve been around long, then you can’t have been paying much attention.
    Far from being “no more Mr Nice Guy”, Judge Borchers is renowned around Alice for his plain, honest and often tough speaking to offenders and their lawyers.
    He has been doing this for the last eleven years; i.e. his whole period as a local magistrate.
    A lot of people complain about the members of the judiciary. It would often be more useful if they took the care to read what the judges and magistrates have actually said.

    View Comment
  16. Surprised!
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 12:02 pm

    @ Diane: I’m a little unsure what you are trying to say here.
    Doesn’t the responsibility belong to the parents in the first instance?
    If the parents don’t wish to take that responsibility, then unfortunately it becomes a “government societal responsibility”, but the harsh reality is that society as a whole, suffers.
    We then react by, limiting when we go out, become more security conscious about our houses, cars and personal safety.
    We become unwilling prisoners in our own society.
    How is this fair and just?
    In my opinion, in the case of minors, the parents must become responsible, if they can’t / won’t, then the minor must accept the responsibility.
    Remembering that so many of these crimes are what I would consider adult crimes, they should be dealt with accordingly i.e. in an adult way.

    View Comment
  17. Pete
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 11:37 am

    I imagine there may be some answers to Diane’s questions in a few weeks from Commissioner White and Commissioner Gooda who, incidentally, made his views known via Twitter in the days before his appointment.

    View Comment
  18. Paul Parker
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 11:05 am

    All children MUST attend school.
    Government must support and promote self-discipline, with consequences when individuals fail.
    Politicians and advisers to governments for too long preferred provide emotion influencing language, particularly racism which divides Australians and diminishes legal accountability.
    Preferential flavors dividing communities cause these problems, with resulting behavior foreseeable consequences.
    Elimination of racism requires we all share equality, equality of rights with equality of responsibility.
    Politicians failing to clearly promote equality of rights and equality of responsibility when voting for legislation fail their communities.
    While governments promote racism, these problems thrive.

    View Comment
  19. Average Joe
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 11:02 am

    Thanks Alice Springs News Online for giving us an insight into just how frivolous the CAALAS complaint actually is.
    Commonsense words from the judge. I understand that the lawyer is just doing his job, but he really was unprepared. If you are going to make comments like the ones he made, come with some hard evidence and proper plans.

    View Comment
  20. Original Centralian
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 10:12 am

    @ Lachlan: I assume that CAALAS were expecting a softer response for the Judge.
    Sounds like Mr Borchers is “no more Mr Nice Guy”.
    Wish it would rub off on some of the other Judges and politicians also.
    Too many do-gooders making big noises.

    View Comment
  21. Lachlan
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 9:35 am

    Why is CAALAS making a complaint?

    View Comment
  22. Surprised!
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 9:28 am

    Well done Judge Borchers, you clearly have the courage of your convictions.
    We need more people like you.
    Hopefully you receive the backing so needed in these instances.
    Perhaps some pollies will support you too, if they have the guts.
    Mr Bhutani needs a serious alignment of his moral compass or a reality check.
    The evidence is overwhelming and yet he has the audacity to attempt to make ridiculous excuses for Corbett in an attempt for leniency.
    Clearly he is too used to getting away with piss poor excuses, but not this time.
    As for CAALAS lodging a complaint against the Judge, on what grounds?
    I would expect that CAALAS would support the upholding of the law! And that they would consider that Corbett had already breached his bail conditions. So what have they got to complain about this time?
    Let’s hope this doesn’t turn into a race thing … again!

    View Comment
  23. Original Centralian
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 9:09 am

    Well done Greg Borchers. The community has had enough. Don’t back down please. Tough love is what is called for.

    View Comment
  24. Diane de Vere
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 8:38 am

    Thank you for this article.
    I select one paragraph – HIS HONOUR: Fine. Who was looking after these young people? He’s a 13-year old. He’s supposed to be at school the next day. So, who was looking after him? Who tucked him into bed, give him the nightly meal, was going to get up, give him his breakfast and get him off to school? Who was doing that? It’s called parental responsibility.”
    And I go back to the footage of the Four Corners video Australias Shame re Don Dale Youth Detention Centre and I ask His Honour:
    Who was looking after these young NT children? Who was protecting them from predatory guards and psycholigical damage and brutalisation by a bullying dysfunctional system, who held the duty of care?
    Who deprived them of food, clothing, a clean warm environment, who instilled fear and terror into their minds, who humiliated and shamed them and applied military style mind control instruments of torture to these children?
    Who failed to provide education and mental health services to these youth?
    Who was doing that? It’s called government societal responsibility.
    And I ask who will be prosecuted and removed so they cannot continue their crimes.

    View Comment
  25. E goodare
    Posted June 20, 2017 at 7:39 am

    Wish we had this judge in Sydney. He is so very right in what he says.
    No point in sending the boy back into the same environment.
    Unfortunately they just expect the government to keep propping their behaviour up, whether they are white or black or immigrants. The community and this country has laws.
    Well done, Judge!

    View Comment
  26. Scotty
    Posted June 19, 2017 at 10:26 pm

    Great work Judge Borchers.
    This is exactly the response the community as a whole would like from the courts.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*