@ David Stokes (Posted August 28, 2017 at 12:51 pm): …

Comment on Did Oz Day row in Victoria scare the horses in Alice? by Alex Nelson.

@ David Stokes (Posted August 28, 2017 at 12:51 pm): Not sure how you come to the conclusion I’m “a bit miffed” David, but you’re welcome to jump to conclusions as you see fit.
Democracy is about the expression of ideas and proposals by eligible candidates, and of their assessment and choice decided by electors.
Historically the Alice Springs Town Council and its predecessors, the Town Management Board in the 1960s and the Alice Springs Progress Association of the late 1940s and 50s, have always been active lobbyists about issues you consider to be in the realm of higher levels of government.
@ Bob Taylor: Thank you for your compliment, it is appreciated.

Recent Comments by Alex Nelson

Town Council riven by conflict, lack of leadership
@ Alex Hope (Posted August 15, 2018 at 11:43 am): You may not be aware just how true is your remark “party politics have always been a part of the town council.”
Here is the slogan for one candidate in the first town council by-election (for two vacancies) for March 24, 1973: “THIS IS YOUR … ALP CANDIDATE IN SATURDAY’S COUNCIL ELECTION. VOTE 1 HADDON, D.J.”
As it turned out, Dennis Haddon came third in the poll on that occasion; however, when Alderman Paul Everingham resigned from the town council in early July 1973, instead of going to another by-election it was decided to appoint Dennis Haddon to replace him.
Anybody who knows the history of Territory politics will appreciate the irony – but wait, there’s more: When Paul Everingham stood as a candidate for the first town council election campaign in June 1971, his election advertisements were authorised by “Peter Edward John Gunner, Stuart Highway, Alice Springs”. Yes, it was current CM Michael Gunner’s grandfather.


Town Council riven by conflict, lack of leadership
Councillor Matt Paterson was nominated by Jamie de Brenni for the position of Deputy Mayor, which was seconded by Jimmy Cocking. Matt Patterson has stated this on ABC radio.


Indigenous gallery: Show me the money!
Hmm, whatever happened to the notion of RESPONSIBLE self-government?
Seems like we’re running off the rails. Federal intervention again, perhaps?


Beer and the tax man’s triple tipple
@ Russell Guy (Posted August 13, 2018 at 9:45 am): Your comparison of the current regime in the NT and the former Soviet Union is noted, comrade.


No ‘comprehensive business case’ yet for gallery
@ Alex Hope (Posted August 11, 2018 at 11:01 am): You have summarised perfectly the situation as regards both the National Indigenous Art Gallery and the standard of government in the NT generally.
And it is not just the NT Government that is looking incredibly foolish on the subject of the NIAG but also a range of business groups, sporting bodies and some media that have become ensnared in this trap of their own making.
It is two years this month since the Gunner Government was swept into power, when voters took the opportunity with a vengeance to wipe the slate clean of the previous disastrous CLP regime.
Who remembers the new CM, hand on heart earnestly declaring a new and better standard of government for all Territorians?
Clearly – yet again – voters across the NT have been betrayed.
Adjectives that immediately spring to my mind to describe the current government are: Incompetent, deceitful, dishonest, bumbling, unprofessional, amateur, insincere, devious, underhand, and – worst of all – hypocritical.
And that’s just being polite!


Be Sociable, Share!