@ John Bell: I didn’t say that. Actually I just …

Comment on You can vote No with love: Alice priest by Number 19.

@ John Bell: I didn’t say that. Actually I just pointed out that that is what Mr Raass said. He said it and then promotes discrimination? Weird.

Number 19 Also Commented

You can vote No with love: Alice priest
John Bell: If you call my comment firing shots then I don’t think you know what a respectful argument means.
I was just trying to show the hypocrisy in Mr Raass’s argument. He said the church disavows unjust discrimination, and also discriminating against homosexuals is a great moral evil.
He says that but then promotes discrimination. Can you see the hypocrisy?
I would like some clarification from him as to whether he is for or against discrimination. As to his response to the survey he can and will do whatever way he likes.


You can vote No with love: Alice priest
“The church disavows all forms of unjust discrimination” but promotes discrimination.
“Any laws that discriminate against homosexuals perpetrate a great moral evil that must be resisted.” So vote yes and end discriminatory laws.


Recent Comments by Number 19

Anzac precinct art gallery: Native title issues unresolved
The government in its latest report has admitted to speaking to just one, apmereke-artweye.
There are others.
Also, there is no mention of any consultation with kwetungurle.
If this place is about honoring and respecting Indigenous peoples and culture these people should have been consulted with long before the government started making their plans for Anzac.
But this is not about respect. It is about exploitation.


Gallery should be all set to go
“If developed properly.” Jeff, that’s the thing this has not been developed properly.
There has been no respect for locals. The government chose the site before any of us knew about the plans and has been trying to bully us ever since.
People travelling from OS or interstate are not going to travel all that way and only go to the gallery.
They will visit other attractions and the town centre wherever the gallery is.
Custodians have been developed, ignored, avoided or hand selected.
Two surveys including the governments own have shown a majority for the gallery but against the Anzac site.
There has been no rational reasoning put forward as to why Anzac is the only possible place.
They have no business case, they have no money no idea and not a lot of support.


Voter banned from Parliamentarian’s office
What’s the point of voting for a Labor Party member if they don’t get to represent my interests on an important issue? Who were the eight or so who voted for fracking? How come they get to decide? Why didn’t my member get to represent me, and which way would you have voted, Chansey?


NT pipeline to make substantial contribution, says industry
By 2030 a world class gas hub will most probably be one that is working for the environment and humanity not against it.


Gallery expert: Anzac site cannot work
Yep.


Be Sociable, Share!