Government breaches faith over CM appointment

2498 Cliff Weeks OKBy ERWIN CHLANDA

 

“Restoring trust in government and delivering on an election promise … to make our democratic system more open and accountable” are the kind of assurances that spill from Chief Minister Michael Gunner’s lips with the greatest of ease.

 

The reality is another thing altogether: The addition to the Alice Springs staff of his department – that’s the Department of the Chief Minister – of an import from WA, to be paid a quarter of a million dollars a year, makes that very clear.

 

When one of Mr Gunner’s staff passed on to a potential private litigant, without our permission, information we had sent to her with a request for comment, then the Gunner Government has surely reached an exceptional low.

 

The appointment of Cliff Weeks and the process through which he was employed are on the public record in several media, and cover issues that require comment and explanation from the government.

 

The Australian newspaper published a report on November 1 this year raising concerns about the employment of Mr Weeks by Mr Gunner’s department, drawing on an earlier report (November 25, 2016 ) referring to Mr Weeks in a WA context.

 

The Alice Springs News Online published a report on November 6 that a highly experienced local businessman, Bruce Deans, had been all but ignored as an applicant for the job.

 

We sought comment about the second report in The Australian from the most senior member of the Gunner Government in Central Australia, Minister Dale Wakefield, most likely to have a lot of contact with Mr Weeks in the future. She ignored our request.

 

A reader, whose identity we know and with whom we have spoken about his experiences as a former colleague of Mr Weeks, wrote to us in critical terms about him.

 

We had offered publication of his account without disclosing the author’s identity, subject to us offering the right of reply to the department.

 

We sent the reader’s comment to the communications manager of the Department of Chief Minister, Kim Wheatley at 8:57am on November 8, requesting comment by noon.

 

At 11:26am we received an email from lawyers “Bennett + Co” in Perth, saying they are representing Mr Weeks, and threatening to sue us and our correspondent for defamation.

 

The email was signed by “Martin Bennett, Principal” and said: “I have been provided with a copy of a letter to the editor … which I understand you intend to publish at noon today.”

 

At the same time Mr Bennett emailed us the copy of a Writ of Summons in the Supreme Court of WA between Clifford Gerald Weeks and Nationwide News Pty Ltd as well as Amos Aikman (the writer of the November 1 report in The Australian).

 

We asked Ms Wheatley whether the NT Government was supporting the legal action by Mr Weeks.

 

She replied, inviting us to attribute this to “a spokesperson from the Department of the Chief Minister”: “Mr Weeks’ legal actions are his private business. The Northern Territory Government is not connected with this matter.”

 

There has been no disclosure by Mr Gunner nor Ms Wheatley of who “provided” to Mr Bennett the professional correspondence to her from the Alice Springs News Online.

 

This was the remainder of Ms Wheatley’s reply:-

 

“Mr Weeks is employed by the Department of the Chief Minister. CEO, Ms Jodie Ryan has confidence in the recruitment and selection methods of the Northern Territory Public Service and is comfortable with the process and the outcome of this recruitment activity.

 

“The Northern Territory Public Sector’s (NTPS) workforce should reflect the community it serves.

 

“All public sector appointments undergo a merit-based assessment.  In this instance, there were multiple ATSI applicants, who were all considered as part of the process.

 

“This rigorous process confirmed that Mr Weeks was the most meritorious for the role.

 

“As an experienced Chief Executive Officer with over 15 years in government administration, 10 of these in senior roles.

 

“Mr Weeks has significant experience in providing leadership across government from policy design and development through to service delivery and operations, managing a number of strategic responses to government priorities in regional and remote locations.

 

“Referee checks were also carried out as part of the process. Mr Weeks’ referees supported his leadership, management expertise. In addition, Mr Weeks’ referees alerted the panel to the significant and complex change agenda he undertook, noting that significant organisational changes often result in anxiety and concern for some staff members.

 

“Mr Weeks has a career history in Aboriginal Affairs and as such has been across indigenous issues throughout Australia for many years, making him appropriately qualified for the position.”

 

The WA Department of Indigenous Affairs website published this in part of a “CEO profile” of Mr Weeks in March 2012:-

 

Q: What does it mean to have an Aboriginal man as the Director General of DIA?

 

A: It means that I am able to lead from the front. My Aboriginality helps with my understanding of where people are coming from, what the issues are and how to effectively address them. It also means that some decisions I take might not leave me popular with members of the Aboriginal community, but I’m committed to making decisions that will help foster long-term change.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

5 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Toby
    Posted November 16, 2017 at 7:21 am

    @ Diane de Vere: You are pretty much correct about this recruitment process. Also built in to such positions is a “no right of appeal” so their already selected “applicant” can be slotted straight into the job with the congratulatory back slapping. All fair and transparent as a brick wall.

    View Comment
  2. Diane de Vere
    Posted November 15, 2017 at 5:29 am

    Re “all public sector appointments undergo a merit-based assessment”.
    I could write several books about this statement. It is not what you know, nor ones ability to provide proven evidence of success in the required field, rather it is whom you know, and in fact very often position descriptions are written to accommodate an already politically selected applicant, with selected referees.
    It is a pattern perfected in the NT and evident in Aboriginal organisations and government departments across the country.
    It is not conducive to closing the gap, open accountability / transparency or fostering healthy productive workplaces where the targeted recipients of funding are included and actually reap the benefit.

    View Comment
  3. Alex Hope
    Posted November 14, 2017 at 9:04 pm

    @ Toby: Is “indigenous” already a tainted adjective? I thought it had come into common use to acknowledge the other aboriginal people of Australia, who tended to be forgotten when “Aboriginal” became a capitalised proper noun, to indicate the non-Torres Strait Islander original peoples, and avoid the temptation to use the “ATSI” which seems a disrespectful way to refer to our First Nations.
    Perhaps some of your local Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander readers can provide some guidance on the names they prefer to be called by.

    View Comment
  4. Toby
    Posted November 14, 2017 at 9:22 am

    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders of the NT apply for these executive positions but get passed over / ignored.
    It’s all lip service and a farce by the NT Government to encourage ATSI to apply for such positions.
    As long as that criteria is met by the NT Government is all that matters. Government is just going through the motions. It appears it applies to Territorian ATSI or not.
    Applicants from interstate seem more appealing somehow although knowing bugger all about the NT.

    View Comment
  5. Posted November 13, 2017 at 9:53 am

    I am left wondering if, in due course, we will be hearing another public apology from the Chief Minister for an ill-advised decision on the part of the NT Government for having got it wrong.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*