It is sad when you realise that the person who …

Comment on No Turnbull Christmas present for CDU by Evelyne Roullet.

It is sad when you realise that the person who answers a business call does not know how to do it or/and you see a business graduate who cannot give money change without the till. (They are not Aborigines.)

Recent Comments by Evelyne Roullet

What REALLY goes on in our streets: Youth worker
@ Paul Parker: “Clearly the NT has become an apartheid state, where the rights, responsibility and accountability of residents appears first determined by racial tags”.
Apartheid refers to a political system where people are clearly divided based on race, gender, class or other such factors.
The NT became an apartheid State when the Federal government scrapped the Racial Discrimination Act so that they could implement three specific rules: The right to send the army into Aboriginal communities, the establishment of non-Aboriginal managers within Aboriginal communities, and the supervision of people’s social security payments!
If they done this to another ethnic group there would have been a revolution.
But the topic is out of this discussion!

Lasseters private enterprise beacon in stagnant town
Yes, Pratty Bruce, I remember the day when, a few days after the opening, the well dressed boyfriend of my daughter was refused entry because his trouser had a stud!

What REALLY goes on in our streets: Youth worker
The age of criminal responsibility acts as the gateway to the criminal justice system – under a certain age you are kept out.
Australian criminal jurisdictions have a modern approach, with two age levels of criminal responsibility: A lower one under which a child is always presumed too young to ever be capable of guilt and can, therefore, never be dealt with in criminal proceedings (currently under the age of 10); and a higher one where the presumption that a child is incapable of crime (termed the presumption of doli incapax) is conditional.
Children in the higher age group, between 10 and 14 years old, can be convicted of criminal offences only if the prosecution can refute the presumption of doli incapax.
This can be done by proving the child understood that what he or she had done was wrong according to the ordinary standards of reasonable adults.
We need to remind teenagers of a sobering reality: “You are no longer boys and girls, you are men and women. You are an adult when your body says so, but you don’t get the perks and privileges that adults enjoy until you earn them.”
The last point goes for any age.
Teenagers are at an age of life when their focus should be on taking on the responsibilities of adulthood.
Alas, we live in a society that clings tightly to extended adolescence, the banalities of youth culture, and the choice of older people to refuse to act their age (grandparents who do not want to be called Nana and Poppy “60 is the new 40” or whatever).
This said I believe that most children aren’t born innately good or evil; rather, they learn what is acceptable behaviour (or not) from the adults around them.
We should introduce the concept of parental responsibility into our criminal code.
Imposing legal and financial responsibility for kids’ criminality on parents will force grown-ups to become better parents.
And for those mums and dads who lack the financial capacity to meet their delinquent children’s obligations? Start docking their welfare payments.
Nothing focuses a lazy parent’s mind like the prospect of losing taxpayer funding for their lifestyle.
Why should those of us who work for a living subsidise adults who fail to raise their own kids properly?

Turn from endless consulting to making it happen
@ EADE: “But at the end of the day there is always risk, and it is up to the government to minimise that risk and look after the community”.
Correct, but in this case the “minimising” is not good enough. Living is a risk that we all face from the day we are born, but some risks like this one are not worth taking.
When we have no clean water supply, all the “sorry” in the world will not fix it.

Mayor Ryan short on answers on top issues
@ John Bell: Jimmy has more than long hair in common with great men: all had being ridiculed by their peers.
Jesus was ridiculed by His Brothers, Moses was rejected By His Brethren …
Newton was labelled heretic. Newton’s religious views developed as a result of participation in an investigative discourse with Nature (the nature of the world).
Trying to convince you that Albert Einstein was rejected in any way during his lifetime let alone a moron is a hard sell, considering that he was one of the most famous men on the planet at the time.
Why not Jimmy?
@ Fred and John
“Research done by Ramon Mora-Ripoll, medical scientific director at Organizacién Mundial de la Risa, Barcelona Spain, has shown that humor and laughter is related to health, and can release physical and emotional tension, improve immune functioning, stimulate circulation, elevate mood, enhance cognitive functioning and, not surprisingly, increase friendliness.”
So if we communicate with humour, we develop friendship.

Be Sociable, Share!