Cops @ bottlos: Give us the numbers!

 LETTER TO THE EDITOR

 

Sir – We believe that gaps in the presence of police at the town’s bottle shops has led to a significant increase in alcohol related harm, including emergency department presentations. The public is entitled to know how the gaps in police attendance are affecting health and safety.

 

On one morning last week about twenty heavily intoxicated people were in ED. On this same morning there were two people in Intensive Care with life threatening stab wounds. This is on top of a tragic and apparently alcohol – related suicide in the same week.

 

Alice Springs used to be the stabbing capital of the world and we have regressed very rapidly as a result of the change in police policy and practice.

 

We need access to the data in real time so we can see what is happening, including whether there has in fact been an increase in grog related deaths and injuries in Alice Springs. We urge the NT G overnment to make the information available at least from the hospital, so the real effects of the lack of a full police presence can be gauged.

 

The police are now occupied with Operation Haven, checking DV orders and people on the Banned Drinkers’ Register.

 

This should be in addition to and not instead of police on bottle shops, which is the proven most effective preventative measure.

 

Police have advised that it will not be until Christmas that the new licensing auxiliary system will be in full force at all the town’s outlets.

 

If the police are making an operational judgement that they do not need to cover the outlets full time, the public is entitled to know the consequences for health and safety. We need to have absolute transparency and currency on data.

 

Dr. John Boffa (pictured)

People’s Alcohol Action Coalition

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Paul Parker
    Posted March 30, 2018 at 12:39 pm

    I disagree with Dr Boffa.
    Requiring police to supervise bottle shops to identify persons on the Banned Drinkers’ Register or who are intoxicated, then dealing with them, is a waste of police resources.
    Effective preventative measure is ensure police immediately order closure of any licensed premise which supplies alcohol to persons on the Banned Drinkers’ Register or who at time of service were intoxicated.
    Interstate, many licensed premises provide free to use indicative blood alcohol breath testing devices for customers and they certainly use them.
    To supervise premises, bars and bottle shops, to ensure intoxicated persons or persons on the Banned Drinkers’ Register are identified is the licensees’ responsibility.
    With high risk of police ordered short term closure, licensees will act to reduce this risk.
    If such closures repeated then refer matter to court to determine if a license needs be canceled.
    Police need public support, those who act to hinder need be referred so court considers whether add them to Banned Drinkers’ Register.

    View Comment
  2. Surprised!
    Posted March 27, 2018 at 11:57 am

    As Dr Boffa works for Congress, I’d be interested to see what Congress is doing to assist with resolving the issues, alcohol, DV and anti-social behaviour.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*