Gallery at Anzac consult: council hurries to meet govt deadline

2549 rugby May 2011By KIERAN FINNANE

Last updated 10.56am 17 July 2018.

 

If the Town Council wants to consult the community over the future of Anzac Oval (left) it had better get a move on: this was essentially the message from Tourism and Culture Minister Lauren Moss after council met with her and Braitling MLA Dale Wakefield on 5 July.

 

The NT Government will be “looking to make a decision about the next steps” of the National Aboriginal Art Gallery after August: “It is important that Council’s position about the use of Anzac Oval is clear by this stage,” wrote Ms Moss the following day.

 

The council-owned Anzac Oval forms part of the government’s proposed location, providing its green space; the gallery building would be on the site of the old Anzac Hill High, now St Joseph’s Flexible Learning Centre.

 

“I do wish to express concern that Council made a resolution to further consult the community but does not yet have a plan for how and when this will occur,” Ms Moss said.

 

“I reiterate Dale Wakefield’s offer for you to utilise the resources the NT Government has already mobilised, including our locally based consultation team and the pop-up coffee shops and event stalls.”

 

p2541 ASTC Scott Allen 400Council’s Director of Technical Services Scott Allen clearly thinks that is a good idea, despite the widespread discontent in the community over the way in which the government has handled these consultations.

 

Right: Scott Allen in hi-vis with Cr Jamie de Brenni at Newland Park community consultation (photo from our archive). 

 

He recommended that council enter into a “partnership” with the government regarding the location of the gallery and was unusually interventionist on the issue in last night’s meeting.

 

Generally, in my observation over many years, officers present their reports and answer questions rather than argue for an outcome.

 

Last night Mr Allen opened the debate, saying this was council’s opportunity to get into “the conversation” and on separate occasions attempted to be persuasive about the advantages: a partnership would mean council could use government resources and “leverage off” the information the government has gathered.

 

Some councillors baulked at the idea of a “partnership”.

 

Councillor Jimmy Cocking described it as entering into an MOU “by default”, a step council specifically rejected at its end of April meeting.

 

In the community’s eyes, a partnership would mean that council is part of the same government process, said Cr Cocking, urging council “to do this ourselves, it’s our asset”. (It was Cr Cocking at council’s end of June meeting who pushed for council, better late than never, to do its own consultation on the issue.)

 

Cr Marli Banks was also wary of the idea, given that the government has “campaigned” for the gallery to be located at the Anzac Hill precinct.

 

p2496 ASTC Cocking, Paterson, Melky 430Cr Catherine Satour was “not comfortable” about a partnership.

 

Left: Crs Cocking, Paterson and Melky (photo from our archive). 

 

In the end though, councillors unanimously agreed to accept the government’s “assistance”  although it is not clear what form this assistance may take.

 

They also were in favour of council’s Communications Unit developing an online survey about the location of the gallery and to promote the survey via the council rates distribution notice (which of course goes only to ratepayers).

 

Their unanimous support means that officers can begin to take action to get the ball rolling, rather than having to wait until after the meeting at the end of the month.

 

In addition councillors were in favour of this oddly worded resolution: “Does the community support a change of use of Anzac Oval to accomodate the development of a National Aboriginal Art Gallery on Anzac High School?”

 

A question can’t really be the subject of a resolution of council. This properly belonged, and seemed to be intended for, the draft of the online survey which was included in last night’s papers but will now be word-smithed by officers and the Communications Unit.

 

Missing from that draft was any question about alternative locations for the gallery, although Crs Glen Auricht and Banks both raised this issue. Cr Auricht said it was important “to get alternative locations voiced”.

 

Cr Cocking raised concerns of some with the gallery’s proposed location inside the Gap, referring to the strong views expressed by several prominent local Aboriginal people that the gallery be built south of the Gap for cultural protocol reasons (see Harold Furber’s comments here and comments by other native title holders here).

 

p2519 ASTC gallery Rugby 430Other councillors were more concerned about the relocation of the rugby codes (a meeting with them will be held today) and about carparking.

 

Right: Drawings for proposed new rugby fields at the base of the ranges. According to the minutes on council’s meeting with Minister Moss, the Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority “is okay” with this site. 

 

Deputy Mayor Jamie de Brenni said he didn’t accept the government taking carparks away. The initial plans show green space where the oval’s current carpark is (facing Wills Terrace) with gallery parking provided at the base of the hill. Cr de Brenni said council should put up a proposal to keep the carpark where it is, with some modifications such as angle parking.

 

Cr Matt Paterson, a strong supporter of the MOU and Mr Allen’s suggested partnership, had gone further, distributing his own drawings of how carparking could work in with the government’s plans.

 

It would appear that in council’s meeting with the Minister, these were the predominant concerns:

 

“I acknowledge the issues highlighted by Council members at this meeting that are critical to the Alice Springs community,” she said in her letter, “particularly a clear design and vision for the Art Gallery which also includes adequate car parking and open green space, and the development of sports infrastructure at a new site that will accommodate the rugby codes and other sporting codes.”

 

Minutes of the meeting show that locating the gallery south of the Gap did come up, although the only discussion point recorded is “Aboriginal community has a broad range of views”.

 

The minutes also mention that a National Reference Group is to be set up (EOIs were being sought in April so progress is slow). In one line of the minutes it say this group will be made up of “50% Indigenous Stakeholders / 50% Community”; in another line it says it will have an “Aboriginal majority”.

 

The minutes also report that positive discussions about having the gallery in Alice Springs have taken place with the Federal Government and that there have been meetings with “10 National Stakeholders” about collections.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

10 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Concerned Rate and Taxpayer
    Posted July 19, 2018 at 5:23 pm

    Enough of this nonsense. The Mayor and Council are sitting on their hands and would be lucky to get a survey to the residents of Alice Springs actioned by August next year!
    Why doesn’t the bureaucratic pontificating Mayor take 12 months leave and leave Jamie (a real action man) along with new councillors Jimmy, Matt and Jacinta plus Eli to take charge of the decisions on the project?
    Of course the majority of Alice Springs residents want the art museum and gallery built here but NOT on Anzac Oval, preferably at Desert Park, or south of The Gap, and the Chief Minister and Cabinet know that fact.
    Someone in council show some balls and get the message to Darwin NOW!

    View Comment
  2. Ray
    Posted July 18, 2018 at 8:51 pm

    I am curious as to the results of consultation that obviously occurred with the residents of Bradshaw Drive who will be affected by the new footy fields.
    It is obvious to Blind Freddie there will be increased traffic, light spill at night and noise pollution directly affecting those residents.
    I would be interested in these results because surely the government would not fail to consult like they did with ANZAC Oval?

    View Comment
  3. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted July 18, 2018 at 5:21 pm

    James T Smerk, your comment equals emotional blackmail.

    View Comment
  4. James T Smerk
    Posted July 18, 2018 at 12:27 pm

    It isn’t going to happen and the town has no one to blame but itself for its inevitable downfall. The government should have announced it and started it that week.

    View Comment
  5. Psuedo Guru
    Posted July 18, 2018 at 8:03 am

    Chinese would sort things and build it overnight.

    View Comment
  6. Ginnia
    Posted July 18, 2018 at 7:51 am

    There is space, south of The Gap, to build a fantastic cultural centre and art gallery in a highly visable area near the college.
    Instead the government is absolutely determined to squash the centre into a less attactive area, remove much needed car parking, and spend millions on building new sports fields.
    Of course the government will not do any thing about replacing the car parking the residents this town council represent need to access the church, senior citizens, youth centre etc.
    All round this project will be a disgusting waste of public money, a poorly designed project that could have been so much better.

    View Comment
  7. Yvonne
    Posted July 18, 2018 at 6:56 am

    The Art Gallery should be built South of the Gap to respect the Indigenous people and their culture. It will cause a lot of problems and discontent to build the gallery on Anzac Oval. This issue is dividing our town and it’s time the NT Govt started to look at the site the Indigenous people want. Leave Anzac Oval and School alone.

    View Comment
  8. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted July 17, 2018 at 3:09 pm

    It is important to respect, recognise and invest in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s cultures. They have told us repeatedly that it is central to their lives, and identified culture as a key factor in improving and maintaining wellbeing. It shapes Indigenous identity, linking people to their community and country, and importantly is a contributing factor to health and wellbeing.
    However our government wants to built a so called cultural center which will be a contradiction to Aboriginal Culture.
    Possible scenario: Anzac oval disappears (who gets the money?) everything is bulldozered but he gallery cannot be built because of the opposition of the legal custodians of the site.
    Protocols for welcoming visitors to country have been a part of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures for thousands of years.
    Despite the absence of fences or visible borders, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups had clear boundaries separating their country from that of other groups. Crossing into another group’s country required a request for permission to enter.
    Another possible scenario: The gallery will be built but legal owners have the rights to tell visitors that they are not welcome.

    View Comment
  9. Alex Hope
    Posted July 17, 2018 at 11:56 am

    1: I endorse Mr Shiell’s point above, and remind the reader that neither the Aboriginal-majority advisory committee nor the government seem to have consulted, let alone listened to, the traditional owners of Mpartnwe. This would be a very sad irony when we are talking about creating a new national institution to celebrate indigenous culture!
    2: How come the site to the East of Yarrenyty Arltere Town Camp (Larapinta Valley) is suddenly available for a rugby oval, when it was ruled out as a suitable site for the Steiner School by the planners and the then minister (Sid Stirling) when they were being evicted by Araluen and desperate for a grant of public land as all other non government primary schools in the NT had obtained previously. Have the planners now been railroaded by their political mistresses?
    3: When will we see a discussion paper setting out the pros and cons for the different sites, with estimated social and financial costs and benefits for each. It is hard to have a sensible discussion without the basis provided by such a document.

    View Comment
  10. Trevor Shiell
    Posted July 17, 2018 at 10:40 am

    The mention of alternative locations appears to have been glossed over again. The fact is that the Indigenous community does not want the facility North of the gap for cultural reasons. The Govt does not want it anywhere else for economic reasons.
    The obvious thing overlooked is that many people come here for an Indigenous experience and there is none better than Yirrara College which is where the Centre should be and where the students can demonstrate their cultures and training in the world of commerce at the same time, and give visitors a positive experience of Indigenous education.
    This should be only one element of a new tourism precinct South of the Gap commencing with an up to the mark tourism centre at the welcome rock where every visitor from the South has to pass to get to the NT. This would be to the advantage of everyone including the Mall traders, who seem to be calling the shots.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*