@ Whatacrock. It is difficult to keep a straight face …

Comment on Motion carried for former Prime Minister, Jacinta Price to pay for council party by John Bell.

@ Whatacrock. It is difficult to keep a straight face and enter into serious discussion with an unidentifiable Whatacrock comment writer who can draw comparisons between Alice Council naughty types and the world changing actions of British WW 2 leaders / appeasers.
Then again, we always did tend to think the world revolved around us Alicians when we were younger. Guess things never change.

John Bell Also Commented

Motion carried for former Prime Minister, Jacinta Price to pay for council party
@ Whatacrock. Must admit, your comment on Chamberlain and appeasement of Hitler was drawing a rather obvious reference to council members trying to appease “make it all go away”.
Otherwise, why make the reference at all?
Another unfortunate comment relating to WW2 was made recently by a Member of Federal Parliament. Not necessary at all.
Now that this motion about political interference in council affairs has been passed, I imagine all future political involvement in council affairs will be a no-go zone. So Peace, bro.
This whole issue has been thrashed to death, don’t you think?.


Motion carried for former Prime Minister, Jacinta Price to pay for council party
Mayor Damien Ryan, a Labor man to his bootstraps, showed his integrity and his political goodwill when he saw no reason to continue the motion.
Mayor Ryan was saying OK, the incorrect thing was done here but let’s not continue the animosity.
It is not to the credit of those councillors who insisted on pursuing this motion. The point had been made. The private citizen’s payment should have ended the matter.
But no, petty point scoring was insisted upon.
Mayor Damo, you showed your mettle. Councillors, you have not covered yourselves in glory.


Recent Comments by John Bell

Heatwaves need to be treated as emergencies: Cr Cocking
@ Domenico. So many people whom you loosely call “deniers” agree with you that action is to be taken to reduce pollution yet disagree strongly with you and those who are loosely termed “alarmists” on the anthropogenic percentage cause of impending catastrophic global warming. And on how to deal with the problem. So both sides are tired of arguing.
However, all scientific argy bargy and arguments of methodology aside, there are serious ethical issues in the debate on catastrophic global warming that will not go away or be silenced.
A major ethical issue for me is this question: How can any alarmist in government or oppositiin or in the general public morally justify the continued sale of fossil fuel coal to other countries?
It seems to be hypocrisy writ large to me.


I never found my mother
Millie and John. Just in case you may have lost touch with Gordon and Norma.
They moved from Canberra when Gordon retired and shifted to Mosquito Bay on the NSW South Coast several years ago.


House break-ins more than double
The increase in house break-ins is a trend not just in Alice, but in Melbourne and elsewhere around the country.
It is an invasion of privacy that frightens most people and destroys public confidence.
Could this growing phenomenon be partly because of the fact that social media has broken down the old standards of personal privacy in the community?
If young people can so easily say and post just about anything to bully in a public media forum, then it stands to reason that their respect for the privacy of others must gradually be eroded.
The only way to teach them respect is to show them the suffering their invasion causes.
If that does not work, then payback becomes an option that is gathering momentum in a community that is frightened by the failure of the authorities to deal with it.


The stolen child who went to university
Worked with Joe Croft in DAA in Canberra.
Crofty was a goodhearted bloke and he listened to what everyone had to to say.
That struck me about Crofty. He was a great listener.


Heatwaves need to be treated as emergencies: Cr Cocking
@ Ali Corcoran: “The power of arguing from an evidence baseā€“for which anthropogenic causation is overwhelming. Having an ‘entitled’ belief does not make that belief correct in the real, non-flat-earth, world.”
To put King or Queen Canute into perspective.
Four centuries ago, the overwhelming consensus was that earth was, indeed, flat. The “real world” of the day. Then along came Galileo.
In the same vein when overwhelming argument was that the sun revolved around the earth, along came Copernicus.
In essence, the Canute story is an analogy for mankind’s assumed superior knowledge over nature.
To say that man’s ever-refutable consensus evidence proves man’s superior influence over nature is open to challenge.
That is not only Jacinta’s right. The history of eminent precedent tends to make her position highly credible.


Be Sociable, Share!