Proposal to end the code of conduct charade

2476 councillors 450By ERWIN CHLANDA

 

Proposed changes to the Local Government Act will, if they become law, prevent the disgraceful code of conduct process that plunged Councillor Jimmy Cocking into months of turmoil. The complaint against him has been found to be “vexatious and frivolous”.

 

And he was not alone. Cr Eli Melky was also subject to complaints, that were either rejected or dismissed.  A complaint against Cr Catherine Satour remains unresolved.

 

The present arrangement allows the makers of “vexatious and frivolous” accusations, as they are now labelled, to hide in anonymity, so far at least, while a faceless committee took it upon itself to drag out the investigation in secrecy for seven months despite the option of a swift and open process.

 

The working of the Alice Springs Town Council was impaired for more than half a year while distrust and fear ruled.

 

None of the elected members, except Mayor Damien Ryan, would answer questions from the Alice Springs News Online about whether they had lodged a code of conduct complaint or had been subject to one. Mayor Ryan told us neither applied to him.

 

The absurd process was akin to a court process, but court is normally open to the public. In this process, the identities of the judge, the plaintiff and the defendant are all kept secret, and so are the evidence and the judge’s comments.

 

According to the government “Consultation Paper: Proposed content of New Local Government Legislation” this is how disciplinary proceedings are proposed to work.

 

• Complaints must initially be directed to the relevant council. The council will seek to resolve the matter according to council policy.

 

• If the council cannot resolve the matter, the council may refer the matter to the Local Government Association of the NT (LGANT).

 

• LGANT will have a panel constituted of representatives of LGANT and the Director of Legislation and Policy from the Department of Local Government and Community Services (DLGCS).

 

The LGANT panel may reprimand a person; order a person to attend training, mediation or counselling; and order a person to make an apology.

 

A party to the complaint can appeal a decision of the LGANT panel to the Northern Territory Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NTCAT) which will be able to make any order that could be made by the LGANT panel.

 

If a member does not comply with an order from the LGANT panel, LGANT can apply to NTCAT to deal with the failure to comply.

 

In determining such an application, NTCAT will be able to make any order that could be made by the LGANT panel and may also order that the member be suspended or dismissed.

 

If NTCAT dismisses a member it will have the ability to disqualify that person from being a council member for up to five years.

 

PHOTO: The 13th Council during its inauguration in 2017: The smiles faded this year over code of conduct allegations.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Ken
    Posted November 28, 2018 at 9:06 am

    @ Braedon: It was obvious that it was a political statement intent on damage.
    So make your mind up why and where it came from.

    View Comment
  2. Braedon Earley
    Posted November 26, 2018 at 7:18 am

    Who is the vexatious person behind all of these said Codes of Conduct?

    View Comment
  3. Hal Duell
    Posted November 24, 2018 at 10:08 am

    The current system of electing councillors is better than the old system known as exhaustive preferential. The old system could have been designed to favor coattail riders.
    Under the proportional system we now use Alice has been gifted an interesting, innovative and diverse council. They’re only a year and a bit in. Let’s see where they go.
    To say that any elected member can make local statements as a citizen / resident and not as an elected official is true.
    But we also live in a small town where everyone knows everyone.
    So suck it up, princess, and enough with the litigation.

    View Comment
  4. Local1
    Posted November 23, 2018 at 10:25 am

    If Jimmy makes comments as Jimmy, within reason, he is entitled to participate in robust debate.
    If he makes comments as Councillor Cocking, then the code could apply.
    If not, a large part of the community will be prevented from participating in public discussions. Making a complaint that is found to be frivolous and vexatious, should be an offence in its own right.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*