Alec: The reference about the right people getting credit were …

Comment on Kings Canyon community invests in secondary education by Spot.

Alec: The reference about the right people getting credit were credit is due.
For example, the people themselves for supporting and getting this school not only reopened but extended.
[Credit should go to] the foundation, schools and fundraising done around Australia by many schools and the old guy getting around on crutches who had made this a personal commitment, to supporting the community by getting everyone in the room to achive something moving forward.
So, yes, onward and upward.

Spot Also Commented

Kings Canyon community invests in secondary education
This is a great leap forward for the CLC’s community development program supporting the traditional owners with the classroom.
We are all sure this is a great outcome for all of those involved from all over Australia who travelled so far for the opening.
It would have been a bit quicker if this support had been there from the beginning and not now, used for one’s own propaganda at the end.
It is for the children to use, let’s keep it that way.

Recent Comments by Spot

NTG asks AAPA to consult with custodians on gallery & new site
Well Hal, we might just have found that pop up council. Don’t most of the members of the
AAPA have some connection past or present with the land councils? Are these councils now doing the bidding of the current Labor government as well?

Jacinta Price: 4 year commitment lasted 18 months
Jacinta obviously wants to help her people with more than roads, rates and rubbish.
If it means moving on to attempt this well good on her for doing that.
Going up against another who has a history with another council that should be more concentrated on rubbish, roads and royalties instead of politics, has had many years to try to make a difference but unfortunately failed, it is time a local Indigenous person was in a position to make a difference.
So go girl.

Bid to keep Rock climb open by heritage listing
What is to become of tourism with every one slowly taking away the attraction of travelling so far to Central Australia.
It seems the current government must be getting a lot of advice from previous Labor members, the lack of interest and support for the south again giving their presence away.
It would be good to hear how many of the previous Labor government has been put on as over-paid consultants.
The main outspoken person for the closure of the climb has made it a last ditch effort just before retiring and letting the rest of the traditional owners have to live at Uluru and with the consequences for years to come.
They are showing they don’t want to work with the industry they should be very actively involved with. And to leave a moment in history he can claim to have corrected a wrong.
As the large resort is now owned by Aboriginal people, the original argument of “they are not getting anything out of tourism” has gone through a considerable change of dynamics since the the debate of closing the climb started.
Or was the closure just the result of a dummy spit for not getting some thing else? It would be good to get a list of those for and against the closure.
Along with another iconic attraction in Central Australia and one that is located in Alice Springs a town screaming for more visitors, the Transport Hall of Fame has taken years to assemble this, with most of the help from volunteers and private business owners, not just from Alice but all over Australia.
Why has it not received more support from the town? It has and will attract more visitors than another art gallery will.
No one had to destroy existing info structure to build it. Remember Malanka, don’t let any thing be demolished till it is sure to be rebuilt or you will end up with yet another empty lot to add to the character of the town called Alice.
And with the current economic environment?
But to do some thing would be a start. In a convoy of trucks there seemed to be one that has been on display, seen leaving the NT over the holidays. Hopefully not.

Air traffic: Looking down on Alice
After nearly 30 years of the tourism industry adjusting to the fact that Yulara has an airstrip, why is this still being used as an excuse to explain the demise of the number of tourists coming to Alice Springs?
You have a tainted destination with its anti social issues, young kids running around all hours of the night, terrorising anyone walking out of the venues in the town.
It’s fantastic to have security at the doors but it doesn’t make visitors feel safe travelling to and from their accommodation.
Being humbugged by drunks asking for dollars while trying to go to shopping centres, all of this adds up over time.
Fix this and you fix your image, as Central Australia has some of the most iconic scenery and destinations in Australia to visit.
As history shows people will come to see it on holiday and that’s what they want – a holiday not get immersed into local anti social issues.
The new airline schedules should be looked at as a new opportunity now to assist Darwin to become a choice international landing city instead of flying over it to land interstate. Again another opportunity lost to Alice – this should have been done years ago.
With it having more direct international flights to Darwin then on to Uluru, these are numbers who most likely weren’t going to Alice Springs anyway. w
Why not look at this as another opportunity to complete projects like the loop road around King Canyon and attract these new visitors to the Western MacDonnell Ranges and on to Alice Springs from Uluru.
In regards to locals getting cheaper flights – what about Virgin, supporting them more and they might return the favour.
Why after all these years are we finally hearing from the Member for Lingari on this? There must be elections soon. Should be a great windfall for his electorate, as over 40% of the population in the area is Indigenous and the new flights are going to Australia’s biggest Indigenous hospitality training college, this should be looked at as a fantastic vote of confidence for future employment in the industry.
Instead of a big talk fest now on what has happened, how about one on the opportunities this is creating.
Would be so good to hear some action on what has been appropriately called parking the ambulance at the top of the cliff instead of at the bottom all of the time.

It’s remote, desolate and worth billions
Mr Ross said if fledgling Anangu tourism plans, especially in the vast Indigenous Protected Area surrounding the national park, receive the assistance they need to get off the ground nobody will miss the climb.
It seems somethings need to hurry up time is running out very quickly.
How time flies by and the vast difference in procedure there is in the NT.
You only have to search Lake McKay in WA and the development of their potash industry in the region, you will see the senior men and women standing proud of their decision to give their children a future off welfare dependant systems.
You see the traditional owners standing up unlike over the boarder were you will see the designated spokes person or a white lawyer from some other state that is on a short term employment contract to put across the views of the traditional owners whom they don’t list due to their justification of keeping them protected from other influences. And we all just have to take the land council’s word for outcomes of the meetings.
It is mentioned they would get a 10% royalty. Why would this not get absorbed into the land council’s coffers and not achieve a sustainable outcome?
Why not have guarantees of employment opportunities and business ventures in the process instead of being rewarded for not working.
If the Amadeus area will have no mining negotiations until 2021 why haven’t the fledgling Anangu tourism plans been developed as yet?
Very interested to hear why nearly 50% of the NT is now a private national park that the tax paying public is paying millions to put rangers on to look after it and can’t even visit it.

Be Sociable, Share!