To the contrary, the Government is interested in evidence based …

Comment on Little kids big losers by Jamie.

To the contrary, the Government is interested in evidence based practice which is why they reduced funding.
The Government doesn’t and shouldn’t fund initiatives that have poor outcomes.
The evidence at hand is that the communities wanted this initiative and opted for centres that would maximise local employment opportunities.
Government agencies listened and complied.
Having spent $4 million on building the centres and then employing 15 local staff to run them (that’s five staff per centre) the centres have not operated effectively.
Worker absenteeism has been very high, a child care service has not been provided.
Furniture and other items belonging to the centres have gone missing.
The Nyirripi centre shows signs of vandalism.
Now the council wants to employ coordinators at even more expense to try to get the centres working properly.
The council consulted and came up with the current model, now they find it doesn’t work and they want Government to bail them out.
There is no evidence the coordinator model they propose will work, or even that the coordinator positions can be filled.
The MacDonnell Shire has been advertising similar positions for months but centres in Papunya, Liebig and Kintore remain shut.
When these centres have run the coordinator have needed to do far more than help train, supervise and support the local staff.
Most coordinators have not stayed in the positions for long.
How child care centres on remote communities can operate effectively is a work in progress but not one that the Government can or should endlessly support.

Jamie Also Commented

Little kids big losers
Also worth considering that bringing in another provider makes a lot more sense if the three MacDonnell Council centres were included.
They suffer the same problems, are equally dysfunctional; and two of the three have not even run for months.
Six childcare centres under new management is well worth trying.


Little kids big losers
Yes Local, the problem being that the many interstate employees don’t understand how to make community organisations work.
For example, they thought that just because communities say they want local employment means that the local Aboriginal staff will perform their jobs and regularly turn up for work.
Absenteeism in the centres has been running at a very high rate, while salaries have continued to be paid.
Yes, there have been plenty of “cultural” reasons for the 15 staff not turning up for months on end but at the end of the day the child care service has not delivered.
Close them down and start again is not such a bad idea.


Recent Comments by Jamie

Country Liberal Party: custodians ignored on gallery
@ Alex Nelson. It’s their art, their culture, so if the custodians and TOs stump up the $50m I agree they should be the primary authority on this matter.
Centrecorp?


Locally owned supermarkets buck crisis with $1m facelift
Paid for by a taxpayer funded enterprise grant to Lhere Artepe?


Way forward for nation-building projects – south of the Gap
@ Trevor Shiell. The Desert Knowledge Precinct is very high maintenance.
$3.3m in government grants in the 2018/19 financial year.
$1.6m staff costs.
The DKP says it does the following:
DKA facilitates collaborations and opportunities that support new technologies, resolve policy issues around open data and Aboriginal data sovereignty, and support the growth of a new digital economic base and workforce.
It would be interesting to know what the DKP has achieved?
The research arm Ninti One appears inactive.
The precinct itself is a ghost town with many empty buildings.
It seems that the DKP board has failed in the important task of living within its (substantial) means i.e. rent and payments for solar energy.
Under DKP auspices, would the gallery become a further drain on government requiring endless grants?
Councillor Jimmy Cocking is a (paid) board member and it would be useful for him to throw light on the concerns raised here.


Mayor, Deputy let council flounder
Mayor Ryan just announced that the CLP would build the gallery at the Desert Park and he gave the timeline.
He can’t participate in the Town Council process on the gallery because he was conflicted but is happy to talk for the CLP.


CLP would build gallery at Desert Park, not Anzac precinct
This is financially risky in an era when the gallery must be profitable.
Visitor numbers at the Desert Park have been in decline since 2015 and the park has only maintained its bottom line by sharply increasing entry fees.
One of the main reasons is that our hot summers make it too unpleasant to walk around the park.
Our high value overseas visitors are especially sensitive to the Central Australian heat.
So this location is out of town, charges a fee and isn’t connected to the landscape because visitors won’t be slugging around it in the heat.
It will be less profitable than the Anzac Oval location, if indeed it makes any profit at all.
Perhaps the Gunner Government hasn’t communicated well but they got the business case right.


Be Sociable, Share!

A new way to support our journalism

We do not have a paywall. If you support our independent journalism you can make a financial contribution by clicking the red button below. This will help us cover expenses and sustain the news service we’ve been providing since 1994, in a locally owned and operated medium.

Erwin Chlanda, Editor