A new way to support our journalism

We do not have a paywall. If you support our independent journalism you can make a financial contribution by clicking the red button below. This will help us cover expenses and sustain the news service we’ve been providing since 1994, in a locally owned and operated medium.

Erwin Chlanda, Editor

3 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted June 12, 2016 at 1:33 pm

    Collateral damage: Injury inflicted on something other than an intended target; specifically: civilian casualties of a military operation.
    Bombs had been dropped from the air as early as 1849 on Venice (from balloons) and 1911 in Libya (from planes).
    The 1923 Hague conference crafted a sixty-two article “Rules of Aerial Warfare,” which prohibited “Aerial bombardment for the purpose of terrorizing the civilian population, of destroying or damaging private property not of a military character, or of injuring non-combatants.”
    It specifically limited bombardment to military objectives, prohibited “indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population,” and held violators liable to pay compensation.
    In World War I, 90% of the fatalities directly attributable to the war were military, nearly all of them Europeans and Americans. Most estimates place World War II casualties in Europe in the range of 50% to 60% non-combatants.
    It is hard to see how it is in Australia’s national security interests to play an active role in the lethal drone program of the US. Now is the time for an open and honest public debate.
    Not only is Australia playing a “key role” in a program that international legal consensus has declared illegal, it is also betraying an important ally. Pakistan’s government has repeatedly called drone strikes “a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity”, and has called for an “immediate end” to them.

    View Comment
  2. Maths
    Posted June 12, 2016 at 8:29 am

    Joint defense? Or joint attack!

    View Comment
  3. Jack
    Posted June 11, 2016 at 6:45 pm

    Yes Nick, my understanding is that Pine Gap provides real time targeting data needed to conduct drone strike assassinations in a range of countries that the US let alone Australia, is not at war with.
    There have been many mistakes, tall men with beards targeted by Hellfire missiles because they could have been Osama Bin Laden, but they were actually just farmers who happened to look like him.
    There have been many houses destroyed along with the inhabitants including women and children when no terrorists were at home or had ever been there.
    Wedding parties annihilated by mistake.
    Residents of many towns live in fear of drone strikes.
    We are part of all this, Pine Gap is a joint defence facility on our soil.
    In case of nuclear war we will reap the whirlwind because Pine Gap is a first strike target to knock out targeting capability.
    Keep educating Australian’s Nick.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *