Gallery fiasco: school heritage process ‘massively flawed’

2627 Anzac High 1 OKEXCLUSIVE by ERWIN CHLANDA

 

Local historian Alex Nelson says the refusal by the Heritage Council to heritage list the old Anzac Hill High School – clearing the way for Chief Minister Michael Gunner to build the mishandled National Aboriginal Art Gallery on his preferred site – is massively flawed.

 

All students and staff, 1954.

 

Mr Nelson, who meticulously prepared the submission, and who is a member of the Heritage Council, says substantial slabs of evidence had been removed from his application before it was put before the council.

 

Mr Nelson was excluded from the decision-making process – he was not even invited to address the council.

 

He says the former Senior Heritage Officer in Alice Springs, Malcolm Connolly, told him on December 2 “that the document was ‘changed’ and ‘played down’ in order to achieve a decision by the Heritage Council that accorded with the NT Government’s wishes for my nomination not to proceed any further.

 

2468 Alex Nelson SM“For his part Mr Connolly, who was on stress leave, provided in discussion with me a detailed explanation of the situation as he perceived it,” says Mr Nelson (at left).

 

“He departed Alice Springs before sunrise on December 3, abandoning his position in the Heritage Branch. He has subsequently resigned.”

 

The chairman of the council, local identity Wayne “Krafty” Kraft, did not exercise the right of reply offered to him by the Alice Springs News Online, emailing: “You will appreciate that normal ‘Government Protocols’, coupled with the Policies and Procedures pertaining to both the ‘Heritage Act’ and the ‘Heritage Council’, currently preclude me from public comment.”

 

Mr Nelson sent a long email to Mr Kraft and council Heritage Branch Director Michael Wells at 8.47pm last Sunday, and had not received a reply nor acknowledgement by close of business last night.

 

The email, apart of pointing out seven errors, wrote to Mr Kraft about the absence of major facts provided in the assessment report which “certainly means that my nomination, in effect, was not able to be judged properly on its merits.

 

2627 Anzac High 7 OK“The bulk of the history from 1954 to 1986 is almost completely missing,” Mr Nelson wrote to Mr Kraft.

 

“For example, aside from the brief (incorrect) reference to the School of the Air in 1956, there is no mention at all of the history of this world-recognised institution during its 14 year presence at this campus.

 

“It was a major visitor attraction for Alice Springs during this time, not least including two governors-general (Field Marshall Sir William Slim, 1959; William Morrison, 1st Viscount Dunrossil, 1960); as well as Prince Philip in 1956.

 

“As also mentioned, there is minimal – and significantly incorrect – recognition of the immense role this campus played in adult education from 1954 until the mid 1980s, including TAFE and the town’s first university courses.

 

“While there was substantial information provided about identities whose names were used for school houses during the period of the Anzac Hill High School, none (with the exception of Harry Griffiths) had any substantial relevance to the school’s history – and even Griffiths departed town before construction of the school commenced.

 

“Yet there is either minimal or no mention of many significant identities directly connected with the school’s construction (eg. Darwin builder Jim Richards who also commenced – but did not finish – construction of the John Flynn Memorial Church and The Old Riverside [Todd Tavern]; Harold Liddle, local Aboriginal WW2 veteran who manufactured the bricks for the school).

 

2627 Anzac High 3 OK“While Frank Johnson is mentioned in the report, there is no recognition of his role, along with Harold Liddle (and others), in the major political reform enacted in 1953 when the Aboriginal Ordinance was changed to the Welfare Ordinance, giving all adult ‘half-caste’ Aboriginal persons equal civil rights. This occurred while the school was under construction.

 

“There is no mention of Neil Hargrave, successor to Frank Johnson as Member for Alice Springs 1954-62, who simultaneously (amongst many roles) was the chairman of the Alice Springs Higher Primary School committee, and in that role lobbied long and hard for improvements for the school.

 

“Hargrave was and is regarded as one of the most effective elected representatives in the NT’s political history but is now largely overlooked. It was Hargrave, for example, who initiated the Remonstrance against the Commonwealth in 1962,” wrote Mr Nelson.

 

“Equally overlooked are references to the role of the campus for providing emergency relief for evacuees from Darwin following Cyclone Tracy; 8CCC FM radio, the first community radio station in Alice Springs, which also broadcast for the Central Australian Aboriginal Media Association until it had its own studio in the mid 1980s; and the beginning of the Centre for Appropriate Technology.

 

“Equally astonishing is the complete absence of any reference to the first Aboriginal land rights hearings held at the old high school.

 

“All of the above are some of the more prominent examples that have either been downplayed or completely ignored.

 

“It is difficult to understand how members of the Heritage Council apparently did not pick up any of the inconsistencies of the assessment report in light of the considerable information provided in my nomination.

 

“I have also provided a list of 27 documents I prepared while researching my nomination, of which most in turn contain numerous source material articles, that I provided upon request to aid the preparation of the assessment report. I am astonished to find that, with the exception of [two items] there was no reference made to any of the material that I provided in the assessment report.”

 

Mr Nelson is a supporter of the Save Anzac High movement, quoting the assessment report as saying “all buildings are in good condition and presented well”.

 

2627 Anzac High 4 OK“This is in stark contrast to the claim by the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Logistics, calling for tenders for the demolition of the old school, that the school “is no longer fit for use, and poses a risk to public safety,” he says.

 

“They can’t both be right – and both the National Trust NT and Heritage Alice Springs have stated their strong opposition to demolishing the old school.”

 

Mr Gunner is now proposing a swap with the Town Council but that would also require the demolition of Anzac High.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

A new way to support our journalism

We do not have a paywall. If you support our independent journalism you can make a financial contribution by clicking the red button below. This will help us cover expenses and sustain the news service we’ve been providing since 1994, in a locally owned and operated medium.

Erwin Chlanda, Editor


9 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Posted April 9, 2019 at 9:54 pm

    It’s obvious the majority of voters in Araluen got it right in the last Territory election campaign.

    View Comment
  2. Steve Brown
    Posted April 9, 2019 at 5:08 pm

    Oddly enough Domeninco, from around 1984 I’ve noted an escalating deterioration of our town’s earlier strengths and character.
    Those of us who are amongst the town’s earliest families, the builders of the Alice and other towns in the Territory, understood what it took to create healthy, well balanced, economically viable, communities.
    Unfortunately the vibrancy once driven by a very healthy private sector has long since given way to petty bureaucracy and welfareism along with all the blow in petty politic of envy and ignorance those sectors brought with them.
    Replacing vibrancy, hope and belief with a petty mentality of obstructionism and envy, glaring down, standing in the way of, anything that might create, dare I say, the dirty words economic progress!
    This attempt to save an ugly, rotten old, asbestos riddled building of no architectural merit is just another example of that moronic stifling mentality.
    Crime and corruption about which these people winge constantly, flourishes in places that don’t offer hope and progress!
    Sloth and disillusionment flourish in places of bureaucratic overload and petty envious obstructionism!
    To clean our town up, to get it moving, to offer hope, we need to deal with those things!
    We simply must learn to walk right on bye the wingers, specially the blow-in wingers, and to get right on with building our town, a place of enormous potential if only it is given enough air to breathe.

    View Comment
  3. Posted April 9, 2019 at 9:08 am

    Thank you, Peter Bassett, for calling out Steve Brown’s ill-informed rant.
    Since first coming to live in Alice Springs in 1984 I’ve witnessed our town’s once vibrant outback character being slowly whittled down by the sort of re-development supported by Mr Brown and others like him.
    The loss of our heritage places, together with the social problems of crime and racism, has certainly contributed to The Alice’s poor image as a tourism destination.
    If we have learnt anything from our recent past, it is that more-of-the-same is not part of the solution.

    View Comment
  4. James T Smerk
    Posted April 5, 2019 at 4:07 pm

    I agree with Steve.

    View Comment
  5. Peter Bassett
    Posted April 5, 2019 at 2:45 pm

    Steve Brown your comment is as disgusting as it is ignorant.
    Both Gunner and Ryan will regret any further destruction of our town’s post heritage, and thousands of us also well know the same group responsible for the destruction of Marrons and Turner House are also the main instigators of this blatant purile ignorant attempt to increase the capital value of vacant Todd Mall real estate.
    The tourism industry will never revive until the now world famous anti social behaviour and violent crime is curtailed and we all know who has control of that well managed campaign, don’t we.

    View Comment
  6. Psuedo Guru
    Posted April 5, 2019 at 8:54 am

    Local crime and potential flooding make building and contents insurance prohibitive.

    View Comment
  7. Steve Brown
    Posted April 4, 2019 at 4:15 pm

    There is absolutely nothing architecturally noteworthy about this crappy old building, just because a particular person visited, walked past, looked at or went to this school doesn’t make it a place that must be preserved!
    It would hang like a millstone around the community’s collective necks for perpetuity.
    This building has been sitting there rotting for years yet you suddenly find a deep underlying passion and love for it when another use for its location is found?
    I cry BS on this claim!
    You are simply being obstructionist! As per usual I might add!
    Keeping old completely un-noteworthy buildings in premier positions simply creates an enormously expensive ulcerating rot in the central locations of town, forcing us to extend our CBD over a wider and wider area destroying along with that expansion any chance of creating a thriving central CBD.
    So while there certainly are buildings that are noteworthy and worth preserving despite this fact ie Flynn Church and Adelaide House etc.
    Much less noteworthy building such as this old school must give way to the new!

    View Comment
  8. John Bell
    Posted April 4, 2019 at 10:28 am

    This is an example of the destruction of Heritage-listed sites all over Australia.
    The off-shore sell-off of Australian property and utilities and resources to overseas interests in these global market – no sovereign borders – anti nationalistic times is accelerating rapidly in this Leftish political environment.
    Heritage sites and properties stand to be the big loser. Dark Age times ahead.

    View Comment
  9. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted April 4, 2019 at 9:36 am

    May be the time has come for the residents to act more strongly and organise 24/24 pickets watch to prevent the demolition of this building, and the Council (Representative of the residents) must refuse the shift.
    This is cultural protest / revolution; we must not bow to those arrogants in government who obviously are hostile and indifferent to culture and the arts.
    They forget we have elected them and without us they do not exist. Power and money are their gods and they have to remember that “You cannot serve God and mammon”.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*