Council on climate: wide-ranging action as matter of urgency

Above: Activists began to gather outside council chambers at 5.30, planning for their presence at the meeting inside which would vote on Cr Jimmy Cocking’s climate action motion.

 

By KIERAN FINNANE

 

Even more people packed into the public gallery last night to support Councillor Jimmy Cocking in his bid to get council to do more about the changing climate – to not only move towards decarbonising, for which it has a plan, but to work on local adaptation in a warming world.

 

Tactics had changed. The group had one person speaking for them, local business woman Kim Hopper, framing two precise questions for councillors and the Mayor. They stood while she spoke, to show with quiet forcefulness that she spoke for them, but that was their only demonstrative action. And they stayed for the debate.

 

Ms Hopper opened by acknowledging that many of them had not been aware at the last meeting of the way things go in the chamber. She asked councillors to listen with “fresh ears and unbiased opinion”. She also acknowledged that council has a Climate Action Plan (CAP) and thanked them for developing it. It puts them a step ahead of some others, she said, who have signed on to declaring a climate emergency, without having a plan in place.

 

She said many in the group had recently become “intimately familiar” with the CAP and had trawled through meeting minutes to understand what actions have been taken and why. However they had found it hard to find up to date information on progress.

 

Left: Kim Hopper, on the microphone.

 

For example, baseline emissions data for 2017 and 2018 had not been updated and it was not clear what impact the CAP had made on emissions. It was not clear why some actions had been prioritised over others (pool blankets purchased, gaining 45 tonnes in emission reduction, before LED street lighting, gaining 240 tonnes). It was not clear where the commercial composting trial was up to.

 

Her first question was directed to the councillors who sit on the Environmental Advisory Committee (in which the plan had been originally formulated before adoption by council): Could council put into effect, as soon as possible, an online real-time transparent and accessible platform for viewing the progress of the CAP?

 

Such a tool would enable community and business to engage more effectively with council, she said.

 

Mayor Damien Ryan referred the question to Acting CEO Scott Allen, who said he would take it on notice.

 

The second question was directed specifically at the Mayor. Ms Hopper pointed to the concerted efforts by many in the community to show their concern and support for action in this area – their attendance at council meetings, their support for the global climate strike (500+ people, 67 businesses) and other actions that followed, the families who meet on the council lawns every Friday to plan further climate action, the close to 1800 signatures on a petition asking council to declare a climate emergency.

 

(This international movement, started in Australia, continues to gain momentum with the Liberal South Australian Government signing on last week. In Australia, the SAG follows the ACT Government and 55 local governments onto the declaration, with the international total being 1,081 jurisdictions and local governments covering 266 million citizens. National parliaments to sign on to date are Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Gibraltar, Isle of Man, Portugal, Canada, France, Argentina.)

 

“What will it take for this council to consider climate change an emergency issue and act accordingly?” asked Ms Hopper.

 

The Mayor deflected: he is only one of nine, he said, with no more power than the rest. He was sure it would be discussed when Cr Cocking’s motion came up later in the meeting, noting that the motion had been modified from a fortnight ago.

 

But that issue, specifically a climate emergency, was not discussed later and was unlikely to be because there was no mention of the word “emergency” in Cr Cocking’s motion. It described rather a situation of “escalating urgency”.

 

Not that he resiles from his belief that an emergency exists.

 

Late in the meeting, after his motion around the escalating urgency of more concerted action had been debated and amended and carried, and after most people in the public gallery had left the chamber – reasonably pleased with progress, I expect – the issue came up again, briefly.

 

The original motion around developing a climate emergency policy was still on the books.

 

Hadn’t it been “superseded”, suggested the Mayor.

 

But Cr Cocking did not agree. This emergency is not going to go away. He would rather see the motion recorded not as superseded, but lost.

 

The Mayor asked for a vote and it was defeated.

 

Cr Cocking asked for a division, whereby those in the majority stand and their names are recorded  in the minutes (this only happens when a division is called).

 

The minutes will show that the Mayor and Councillors Eli Melky, Jacinta Price and Glen Auricht voted the climate emergency motion down. (Councillors Jamie de Brenni and Matt Paterson were absent from last night’s meeting, apologies accepted.)

 

Back to the earlier debate:

 

In line with the pushback from other councillors a fortnight ago and after meeting with CEO Robert Jennings (absent last night), Cr Cocking had focussed on putting concrete steps forward in his motion. These included allocating $250,000, from the budgetary surplus that may be identified in finance meetings this month, towards accelerating delivery of the CAP.

 

Speaking to the motion, Cr Cocking said that delivery is “behind the original schedule and this sends a poor message to our community regarding our commitment to the urgency and seriousness of the issue.”

 

He acknowledged the steps taken to date, such as buying an electric car, reducing paper based systems and agreeing to carry out “the FOGO trial” (Food Organics Garden Organics collection and composting).

 

“However, our leadership will and must be judged on our actions in addition to our motions and plans,” he said.

 

These would include, in a third part of his motion, instigation of a ten-year Climate Adaptation Plan. This would be about specifically local actions to adapt to the increased warming that is now inevitable, even if global emissions reduction manages to keep it to 1.5 degrees. Things like increasing tree cover and the survival rate of trees  a sore point at present, after last summer’s loss of 5% of street trees, and recent planting failures in Bath Street and Palm Circuit*.)

 

Above: Part of the crowd that turned out on 20 September to support local students striking for the climate. 

 

Long story short: Cr Melky, who had done on a lot of work on the issue over the last fortnight and had been contacted by a lot of constituents, had an amendment to propose which he suggested would strengthen the motion.

 

He had a carefully prepared three-page statement to read. It rejected the concept of “emergency”, scoffing at, as an example of “hollow symbolism”, Canada having signed the declaration only to approve “a massive expansion of an oil pipeline” (the Trans Mountain pipeline, tripling its capacity).

 

He acknowledged “the global crisis” of climate change, making the point that whatever action Alice Springs takes, as a small town, has to be “balanced and responsible, based on population size and resources”.

 

He went on to list in considerable detail what council has done in the domain, quantified in the “millions of dollars” over the years (his list went back to 1998).

 

His amendment eliminated any reference to additional spending (even Cr Catherine Satour and the motion seconder Cr Marli Banks were hesitant about this) but its first part was aimed at strengthening council’s response. Its second part was somewhat superfluous, for council to call world leaders to do the same, and it dropped off what was finally adopted.

 

This was a combination of Cr Cocking’s first point, that council “acknowledge the escalating urgency for climate action to both mitigate and adapt to the impacts that the changing climate will have on our community” and Cr Melky’s amendment, that council “develop and implement a policy that represents the science on the issue of climate change and to strengthen the existing Climate Action Plan, Municipal Plan, Strategic Plan, policies and various other action plans, working towards reducing greenhouse emissions by 50% by 2030 and [to] zero by 2050 as a matter of urgency.”

 

The thrust of the amendment is still on emissions reduction, but it brings into play all of council’s major frameworks, it’s urgent, and the word “adapt” is in there . It’s progress and it achieved consensus.

 

The motion was carried unanimously.

 

 

*To a later enquiry from Cr Banks, Technical Services Director Scott Allen said Bath Street and Palm Circuit will be replanted this week, with improved maintenance to follow.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

A new way to support our journalism

We do not have a paywall. If you support our independent journalism you can make a financial contribution by clicking the red button below. This will help us cover expenses and sustain the news service we’ve been providing since 1994, in a locally owned and operated medium.

Erwin Chlanda, Editor


15 Comments (starting with the most recent)

NB: If you want to reply to a previous comment, start your comment with this notation: @n where n is the number of the comment you want to reply to.
  1. Watchn
    Posted October 3, 2019 at 12:32 pm

    The old global warming graph, aye.
    The same one that has clearly been doctered since the 1999 release of it. Anyway it also shows an example of why people question the whole C02 man made climate change.
    It shows a .75° warming between 1910 and 1945, then into a 70s a cooling? The same decade that the headlines warned of an ice age. Followed by a further .75° warming.
    It is the propaganda I question. Not that the temp is rising. That is easily graphed out via BOM data. Since the 1880s in this town the yearly average clearly shows are drop of 1° leading into the mid 1950s then an 1° climb up to last year.

    View Comment
  2. James T Smerk
    Posted October 3, 2019 at 12:00 pm

    Odd, where are all these apparently passionate school kids adding their voices?

    View Comment
  3. John Bell
    Posted October 3, 2019 at 8:21 am

    @ Alex Nelson. I respect your views as always, Alex.
    However, I am a bit surprised that you draw our attention to articles on “climate change” in The Conversation.
    No doubt you are aware that The Conversation has deplatformed all those who hold opposing views on this topic?
    When a body of like-minded academics and scientists shut up shop and stick their fingers in their ears refusing to allow the other mob to have their say in their publication, don’t you think that tells you something?
    It tells me that Galileo would not have been a subscriber to that illustrious think tank. What does it tell you, mate?

    View Comment
  4. Ian Sharp
    Posted October 3, 2019 at 1:52 am

    Well done Erwin for allowing Alex Nelson to post the link to The Conversation article.

    View Comment
  5. John Bell
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 10:22 pm

    @ Evelyne and Concerned Others.
    Amid all the emotive words on all sides between climate change alarmists and climate change deniers, I think Evelyne you sum it up simply when you draw attention to the basic question that I imply.
    Simply, how in the blazes are we ever going to be able to determine definitively the comparative effect between anthropogenic and solar forces beyond our control in the prediction of impending Armageddon?
    Certainly, all rational sensible humans want to save our planet.
    It is just a matter of working out what will be the nature of the catastrophic end of the world will actually consist of, when it will happen … and what is the best way to try to stop it.
    And that debate will rage until the end of time.
    Because no one has a definitive answer.
    Yes? No?

    View Comment
  6. Posted October 2, 2019 at 2:29 pm

    I seek the indulgence of the Alice Springs News in drawing attention to a recent article published in The Conversation, “Five climate change science misconceptions debunked” (https://theconversation.com/five-climate-change-science-misconceptions-debunked-122570) which includes a section about the effect of sunspots and galactic cosmic rays upon the Earth’s climate.
    Another article, amongst a great many on the subject, is entitled: “Why are climate change skeptics often right-wing conservatives?”
    Worth checking out by all concerned about this issue.

    View Comment
  7. Matthew Langan
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 11:37 am

    It’s a shame Jimmy Cocking and his Communist loving Greens groups didn’t yell and scream, smoke some bongs or do much at all to stop this current Territory Labor Party government from fracking the entire Northern Territory, which will no doubt pollute most of our water tables.
    Anyway, pick and choose. That’s the way.

    View Comment
  8. Evelyne Roullet
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 11:06 am

    Yes, Francis, please explain. John Bell said that there is human-induced climate change, and there are natural climate fluctuations in this his is correct.
    One important factor in the unchanging rise and fall of the earth’s temperature and its different cycles is the sun.
    As its activity varies, so does the intensity of the sunlight that reaches us.
    The sun’s temper varies on an 11-year cycle, typically taking about five and a half years to move from the quieter period of solar minimum, to the more turbulent solar maximum.
    Sunspots sometimes erupt into powerful solar storms that shoot streams of charged particles into space, occasionally in the direction of earth.
    Mounting evidence suggests that the 11-year solar cycle can affect climate and temperatures — the most famous example being Europe’s Little Ice Age, when the sun went through several nearly sunspotless cycles from 1645 to 1715.
    If we cannot control the solar forces that produce warming and cooling produced by a magnetic field,
    (the sun being a huge ball of electrically-charged hot gas that being moving generates a powerful magnetic field that goes through a cycle, a dynamo).
    We living organism of this planet must do our best to not amplify these natural phenomena.
    Humans have caused climate change for 180 years (scientifically proven).
    Ww have created a snowball that has to be stopped!

    View Comment
  9. Zac
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 11:02 am

    @ Francis: Yes you are correct. For those who are interested have a read of this article produced earlier in September 2019 by NASA.
    The article discusses the role of the sun in climate change and from the added graphs it shows that the sun has not much to do with the man made climate change.

    View Comment
  10. John (not Bell)
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 8:57 am

    Francis. Please tell us why he is wrong.

    View Comment
  11. Francis
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 7:33 am

    John Bell is utterly wrong. Just thought I would mention that. Readers can no doubt find out why.

    View Comment
  12. Alex
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 1:30 am

    A great first step. Well done to Jimmy Cocking and the Alice community for pushing this. Look forward to further actions.

    View Comment
  13. Watchn
    Posted October 1, 2019 at 5:03 pm

    We can’t use too much solar. It will suck up all the sun and then be too cold.

    View Comment
  14. John Bell
    Posted October 1, 2019 at 1:38 pm

    Everyone is positive about doing our bit to counter the world’s warming issues. That is good. However, Planet Earth’s warming cycles, examples of which include Roman times and the Middle Ages, all go in natural solar cycles, so to speak.
    For example, Planet Earth is experiencing its hottest part of the solar cycle right now as its elliptical orbit around the sun brings it closest to the sun in 2019. From here, Planet Earth will gradually move away from the sun in its orbit.
    So. If we can manage to reduce all anthropogenic warming effects in 2019 to absolute zero through carbon taxes, innovation, shutting China’s and India’s massive coal fired expansion and living standard development down etc, what is the next step?
    How do we control the solar forces that produce warming and cooling and ice ages etc? Do Alicians have any answers for that?

    View Comment
  15. KEN
    Posted October 1, 2019 at 12:58 pm

    Whatever is fashionable at the moment. There is little baseline science available, only statistics.

    View Comment

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*