Unfortunately for us Territorians Terry and Robyn don’t represent answers, …

Comment on 1 Territory too fixed on opposition to fracking: Lambley by Steve Brown.

Unfortunately for us Territorians Terry and Robyn don’t represent answers, a way forward for Territorians.
They do in fact represent the leftovers of the failed Mills / Giles Government who escaped the judgement of the people by jumping ship, turning their backs on their own Government, distancing themselves from the infighting, claiming victim hood, bla bla bla, while in fact they themselves were amongst the very worst worst offenders!
Examples: The massive 30% jump in energy prices completely.
Another Mills infliction is the Last Resort Home Insurance Scheme which has just about destroyed the Home Building Industry.
The withdrawal of nearly all youth funding and putting nothing back in the desperately needed space. Bad decisions like these didn’t come from CLP policy! They came from Terry and Robyn.
Now, instead of making themselves useful holding government to account as independents, they attack the CLP opposition, of two!
Why? Not because they are looking after the interests of Territorians, that’s for certain.
It’s because they envy the extra funding that goes to the Opposition – their argument, so that they “can be more effective”!
How’s that? By replacing a party Opposition of Two, with two sworn independents.
Yeh, but they’re willing to forgo the independent stuff to form another, perfectly believable party so they can!
Looks like the ego driven infighting that destroyed our last government; looks like the rats that jumped overboard found each other and surprise, surprise, the resulting interaction produces exactly the same outcome!
The last thing the Territory needs is another party headed by a megalomaniac intent on personal glory!
The last CLP government wasn’t ripped apart because people disagreed about direction. It was ripped apart by egotistical wankers who believe they should be leaders!
A huge amount of the damage done to the party was by one Terry Millis attempting to hold on to, then to regain his leadership without the slightest regard for the damage done to the lives of Territorians in the process.

Recent Comments by Steve Brown

West Macs fire mitigation critically inadequate: Scientist
@ Alex Hope: So Alex do you think Parks is achieving its purpose now! Is the buffel eradicated? Is the flora and fauna in a better state than when it was a pastoral lease?
Is the park in a condition that we can show it to the world in order to attract the tourists who fund our economy? Have we protected near extinct species?
To just what level of destruction to you propose we go in chasing what some see as a weed and what others know is actually a highly beneficial grass?
At what stage do you stop this battle against grass and look behind you to see the horrific damage that has been done?
By the time the mentality which you espouse is through, if left to run unchecked, there will only be vast fields of buffel grass left all our native animals, trees, shrubs and grasses will be gone, driven into the ground through the actions of irresponsible idiots.
Sensible licensed grazing by shepherded animals is a practical tool that will not only protect the park to a much greater degree from fire but can also add to the park’s attractiveness for visitors, locals running mobile Dude ranch activities and the like.
Parks are for people Alex, not for the sole use of left wing ideologues hell bent on proving some political point at any expense!
As for Illparpa Rd … you are kidding aren’t you? To keep buffel out of that tiny area quite literally thousands of litres of highly toxic now thought to be carcinogenic sprays has and is being used on a continual basis!
So just how much chemical and how much man power would we need for the park, do you think?

Park fire protection: new management plan doesn’t spell it out
The worst thing about these kinds of documents and plans is that in a world of cut and paste they go on and on often returning to the original. No learning. No advancement.
At least one and probably both of the major fire instances to which the document refers were started by prescribed burning!.
I suspect this latest fire or at least its continuation is also very much down to prescribed burning practices! The Lesson: Prescribed burning puts our parks at much greater risk of wildfire”! And if those traditional owners could only see what their words have led to in practice, they would be utterly horrified!
Time for an inquiry and a whole new plan, along with an extinction event for the original.

West MacDonnells blaze: sorrow and questions
Yes, well its clearly evident the fire management strategies as set out have been thrown all to hell and completely ignored for a considerable period of time.
As a result the damage done to the Western Macs, particularly the eastern end, is immeasurable, horrific, particularly when you take into account present weather outlook.
Whatever wildlife is left will probably starve. This may well be an extinction event for some species, as the ranges are very much the last refuge for some.
Just a few short years of park mismanagement have done more damage than 200 years of heavy stocking even overstocking could.
It’s time for an open public inquiry into the land use and management of this area, which is of strategic importance to the future of our environment, our tourism sector and our pastoralists on the extremities.
Tourism in the Centralian region was founded not on Ayers Rock as many might imagine, but on the Western Macs! They are of the utmost importance to our future!
We cannot let this moment pass without questioning all that has taken place.
I like others share a deep sense of sadness and loss at this devastation, trees and habitat that were literally hundreds of years old in the most precious of places have gone!
It will take centuries without devastating fire in these places to replace them! That is how immense the loss is!
So let’s not waste our time on apologies and excuses, let’s get to the bottom of this thing, let’s have a long hard look at the value of advice and management practices that led us to this place, then figure out a better way of doing things from this time on.

West Macs fire mitigation critically inadequate: Scientist
@ Alex Hope: My very point. It only does harm when you burn it! Not quite sure what’s so hard to understand. It’s simple: You must not burn buffel except when absolutely necessary – back burning, for example.
Patch burning does every-bit as much harm as a major fire and because its mandated in park management it does more harm because its repeated so often, accumulating damage upon existing damage until there is complete loss of anything but buffel.
Further, because of the fire happy culture that’s grown up around this practice, we are seeing a more and more reckless use of the method where we see fire actually being extended, run on, instead of being put out!
Even on days declared as catastrophic risk! In complete contravention of the Act!
The damage being inflicted in the idiotic hell bent fervour to eradicate Buffel is both horrific and completely self defeating.
Because burning suits the buffel and not our native plants.
Despite popular fiction our native plants do not recover well from fire!
With our variable rainfall it can take many years. When you destroy trees hundreds of years old, it takes hundreds of years to replace them!
So after yet another fire disaster, it might just be about time to stop and think a little deeper don’t you think.
The safest way, the least destructive way to deal with buffel is by grazing it, and you should keep in mind that it’s not only the large herd animals that eat it, much of our wildlife has also come to depend upon it.
Further, buffel is a grass. Any attempt to eradicate it by the introduction of a beetle grub or the like would be putting all our grasses at risk, along with our food security and the economy of the nation.

West Macs fire mitigation critically inadequate: Scientist
If I got out a dozer and flattened my house because I was worried about the wind knocking it over, would you understand that that is actually a pretty dam stupid thing to do?
You would … so then understand that in burning grass before it can burn is every bit as stupid, especially when it results in exactly the outcome you claim to be protecting against!
Burning grass of all kinds, not just buffel, in places where it is not a threat to physical assets and human life is a completely unnecessary and extremely destructive thing to do.
The constant burning of country that is being undertaken suits buffel to a tee … you are actually assisting its dominance while destroying all other vegetation!
Despite popular fiction, our trees and shrubs let alone native wildlife, struggle to recover from burning. Burn them two years in a row and they are gone. Guess what replaces them?
I have lived at White Gums, once a dairy farm which now runs beef cattle right next door to Simpsons Gap for 65 years this year.
I drive through it several times a day. I have watched it progress from cattle station to national park.
I watched it through the early years when Bob Darken and others who actually new that land oversaw it
I watched it gradually recover from overstocking and I watched it through the seventies and eighties as buffel colonised the once bare ground.
I watched years later as the moron mentality took hold, the uni-trained experts indoctrinated with cultural garbage and the lefty politics of envy brought this vile culture of burning to life.
Since that time, I’ve watched the complete destruction of what was once a World Heritage level park by burning.
Everyone should understand, it’s not just buffel grass that is burnt! Everything is burnt!
These guys aren’t just burning fire breaks, they burn the entire country!
This reckless irresponsible and ongoing assault on our National Park has led to the destruction of shrubs, trees and wildlife including the vary rare colonies of possums … all gone to deliberate lit, poorly controlled fire.
Once upon a time our ranges were covered with shrubs and trees. They are gone. Killed not by buffel grass but by burning it!
At White Gums every year we get deliberately lit fires which we put out. They rarely do much damage because we graze the grass. This is the natural, sensible way to control buffel that leaves trees and shrubs intact.
And it generates an income! Yes, money! That stuff many of us have to earn so that those dependent on the public purse get paid.
Of course there are fires that occur constantly from lightening ect.
Yes, they burn country however the now rampart culture of burning often sees these fires extended rather than being extinguished.
The attitude is: “We might as well burn it while we are here.”
You have to work alongside these guys to realise the ridiculous levels to which this anti buffel thing has taken us.
We run cattle so on a number of occasions we’ve had to stop the burning out of whole grassy paddocks trying to make them understand that grass is food!
That food translates to a big part of the Territory’s earned income and its not only domestic animals that depend upon it.
Buffel is here. We need to learn to live with it. Buffel does little or no harm, improves our soils, lessens run off and raises overall food production enormously.
Because it contains more energy it also burns hotter than native grasses, destroying native trees and shrubs as a result.
Its ability for rapid regrowth allows it to dominate other species after a fire, so the more you burn, the fewer trees and shrubs survive and the more buffel you get!
So guys, don’t burn it. Put the fires out like you’re supposed to.
Graze the grass and leave our country presentable for both ourselves, our tourists and especially our native wildlife.

Be Sociable, Share!