Loading article…
Loading article…
13 February 2018

End of statement.
Thanks Erwin, for this important follow up article which goes a long way to clarifying the facts.
It’s unfortunate that this wasn’t checked properly before publishing the earlier misinformed article, filled with Loch the Gate Alliance (LTGA) false and misleading statements.
LTGA made two key claims, both were completely wrong:
[1] There was a well integrity issue. This is very easily debunked just by looking at the illustration, the deformation is clearly in the resource rock zone and it is perforated by design either side of the deformation, i.e. intentional breach of production casing integrity to create pathways for the resource to flow out of the rocks, into the casing.
[2] The claim of a cover-up was made by LTGA spokesperson Naomi Hogan, who erroneously believed the illustration and details of the deformation were being “air-brushed out” and not made public, but the fact was this, this illustration and all details were publicly available in the Inquiry submission library (a key source of information for LTGA) since May 2017.
It appears LTGA key representative failed to research key documents and facts properly since at least May 2017, failed to understand the difference between well bore integrity and production casing, failed to courteously ask Origin for an explanation prior to choosing instead to falsely accuse, failed to retract their misleading statement to the Inquiry chair when it was made evident to LTGA they were wrong, but LTGA has succeeded to maintain media interviews and multiple postings in their social media to keep the misinformation bouncing around for the unwary public to digest.
If this isn’t a red flag, then show me what it?
@ Mark Fraser: Thank you for your kind words at the beginning of your comment but I reject that our initial article was “misinformed”.
Please note:-
• We accurately quoted the Lock the Gate Alliance which is a major player in the debate. It describes itself as “a national grassroots organisation made up of over 120,000 supporters and more than 450 local groups [including] farmers, traditional custodians, conservationists and urban residents.”
• Concurrent with posting the initial report we sought comment from the NT Government (which replied on the same day), from the Inquiry and from Origin. We still don’t have a reply from the Inquiry. See my reply to reader Bob Beadman.
• Origin gave us comprehensive information, but only when we made a second approach to them, leading to the report above.
• Your point [1] is a bit of a stretch for people with no geological training such as me and – I guess – the vast majority of our readers.
• Our initial report stated Origin provided information about the deformation to the NT department (in February 2017) and the Inquiry (in May 2017).
• Our question to the Inquiry is why it published, in its “Draft Final Report” in December 2017, a diagram not showing the deformation while one that shows it had been available to the Inquiry since May 2017.
ERWIN CHLANDA, Editor
Thanks Erwin, for this important follow up article which goes a long way to clarifying the facts.
It’s unfortunate that this wasn’t checked properly before publishing the earlier misinformed article, filled with Loch the Gate Alliance (LTGA) false and misleading statements.
LTGA made two key claims, both were completely wrong:
[1] There was a well integrity issue. This is very easily debunked just by looking at the illustration, the deformation is clearly in the resource rock zone and it is perforated by design either side of the deformation, i.e. intentional breach of production casing integrity to create pathways for the resource to flow out of the rocks, into the casing.
[2] The claim of a cover-up was made by LTGA spokesperson Naomi Hogan, who erroneously believed the illustration and details of the deformation were being “air-brushed out” and not made public, but the fact was this, this illustration and all details were publicly available in the Inquiry submission library (a key source of information for LTGA) since May 2017.
It appears LTGA key representative failed to research key documents and facts properly since at least May 2017, failed to understand the difference between well bore integrity and production casing, failed to courteously ask Origin for an explanation prior to choosing instead to falsely accuse, failed to retract their misleading statement to the Inquiry chair when it was made evident to LTGA they were wrong, but LTGA has succeeded to maintain media interviews and multiple postings in their social media to keep the misinformation bouncing around for the unwary public to digest.
If this isn’t a red flag, then show me what it?
@ Mark Fraser: Thank you for your kind words at the beginning of your comment but I reject that our initial article was “misinformed”.
Please note:-
• We accurately quoted the Lock the Gate Alliance which is a major player in the debate. It describes itself as “a national grassroots organisation made up of over 120,000 supporters and more than 450 local groups [including] farmers, traditional custodians, conservationists and urban residents.”
• Concurrent with posting the initial report we sought comment from the NT Government (which replied on the same day), from the Inquiry and from Origin. We still don’t have a reply from the Inquiry. See my reply to reader Bob Beadman.
• Origin gave us comprehensive information, but only when we made a second approach to them, leading to the report above.
• Your point [1] is a bit of a stretch for people with no geological training such as me and – I guess – the vast majority of our readers.
• Our initial report stated Origin provided information about the deformation to the NT department (in February 2017) and the Inquiry (in May 2017).
• Our question to the Inquiry is why it published, in its “Draft Final Report” in December 2017, a diagram not showing the deformation while one that shows it had been available to the Inquiry since May 2017.
ERWIN CHLANDA, Editor